Fuga Michiyasu, Ishibashi Toshihiro, Kan Issei, Hataoka Shunsuke, Kato Naoki, Nagayama Gota, Sano Tohru, Enomoto Hiroyuki, Shirokane Kazutaka, Teshigawara Akihiko, Murayama Yuichi
Department of Neurosurgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
World Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;194:123592. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123592. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Severe vessel tortuosity may prevent a microcatheter from reaching a distal vessel. However, the double-wire technique (DWT) may facilitate the procedure. The present study evaluated the feasibility and safety of guiding a 0.027-inch microcatheter into a distal vessel beyond the tortuous internal carotid siphon (ICS) using the DWT.
We retrospectively reviewed 61 consecutive unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms in 61 patients who underwent treatment using flow diverter or intrasaccular flow disruption with a 0.027-inch microcatheter at our institution between October 2021 and August 2024. The DWT was used for patients in whom difficulties were encountered in advancing the microcatheter beyond the ICS with a single wire. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those who required the DWT (DWT group) and those who did not (non-DWT group). To investigate whether DWT use was associated with the degree of tortuosity of the ICS, a propensity score-matched analysis was used to control for background factors.
Ultimately, 11 (18.0%) used DWT to guide a 0.027-inch microcatheter into the distal vessel of the ICS, achieving 100% success rate. After matching, the radius of ICS was significantly smaller in the DWT group than in the non-DWT group (2.7 mm vs. 3.7 mm, P = 0.039). No significant difference in the complication rate was found between the 2 groups.
Although a 0.027-inch microcatheter is difficult to guide beyond a tortuous ICS to a distal internal carotid artery using only a single wire, the application of the DWT may allow the catheter to be guided without increased complications.
严重的血管迂曲可能会阻止微导管到达远端血管。然而,双线技术(DWT)可能有助于该操作。本研究评估了使用DWT将0.027英寸微导管引导至迂曲的颈内动脉虹吸部(ICS)远端血管的可行性和安全性。
我们回顾性分析了2021年10月至2024年8月期间在本机构接受治疗的61例连续未破裂前循环动脉瘤患者,这些患者使用分流器或囊内血流阻断术,并使用0.027英寸微导管。对于单根导丝难以将微导管推进至ICS远端的患者使用DWT。患者分为两组,即需要使用DWT的患者(DWT组)和不需要使用的患者(非DWT组)。为了研究DWT的使用是否与ICS的迂曲程度相关,采用倾向评分匹配分析来控制背景因素。
最终,11例(18.0%)使用DWT将0.027英寸微导管引导至ICS的远端血管,成功率达100%。匹配后,DWT组的ICS半径明显小于非DWT组(2.7 mm对3.7 mm,P = 0.039)。两组间并发症发生率无显著差异。
尽管仅使用单根导丝很难将0.027英寸微导管引导至迂曲的ICS远端至颈内动脉,但应用DWT可能使导管在不增加并发症的情况下得以引导。