Reis Stephen P, Haider Steffen, Brejt Sidney, Ahmad Noor, Sperling David
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA.
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 26;16(11):e74517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74517. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Aim This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) check and revision procedures performed in a freestanding interventional radiology (IR) outpatient facility. Methodology A total of 40 patients (male 31:female 9, median age 60 years old) underwent a TIPS check and/or revision at a freestanding IR outpatient facility between 2009 and 2017. Procedures were performed using a mobile C-arm unit under intravenous (IV) moderate sedation, with the patient discharged home on the same day. The decision to perform a TIPS check was based on abnormal surveillance ultrasound findings or the recurrence of portal hypertension symptoms. TIPS were revised if the patient was found to have angiographic stenosis, elevated portosystemic gradients, or recurrent symptoms. TIPS were revised with balloon angioplasty and/or bare metal stent placement. Results Revision was attempted in 34 cases, and 6 were found to not require a revision. The average time to revision was 19 months (range 0.6-99 months). Of the 40 patients, 24 (60%) underwent a TIPS check and/or revision due to findings from surveillance ultrasound, while 16 (40%) underwent a check or revision due to a recurrence of symptoms. Of the 34 TIPS revisions, 28 (83%) involved angioplasty alone, 5 (15%) were stent-assisted, and 1 failed due to unsuccessful cannulation. The overall technical success rate for performing the revisions was 94% (32/34). The one-year patency rate was approximately 57%. The mean fluoroscopy time was 16.1 minutes (range: 3.7-52.5 minutes). Post-procedural recovery time was minimal, averaging one to two hours. No major complications were observed (0%, 0/40). One patient (2.5%, 1/40) experienced a minor complication (access site hematoma), and two patients were hospitalized within 30 days for reasons unrelated to the procedure. Conclusions TIPS revision can be performed successfully and safely in an outpatient facility.
目的 本研究旨在评估在独立的介入放射学(IR)门诊机构中进行的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)检查及修复手术的安全性和有效性。方法 2009年至2017年间,共有40例患者(男性31例,女性9例,中位年龄60岁)在独立的IR门诊机构接受了TIPS检查和/或修复。手术在静脉中度镇静下使用移动C形臂装置进行,患者于同日出院回家。进行TIPS检查的决定基于超声监测异常结果或门静脉高压症状的复发。如果患者出现血管造影狭窄、门体梯度升高或症状复发,则对TIPS进行修复。通过球囊血管成形术和/或裸金属支架置入对TIPS进行修复。结果 34例尝试进行修复,6例被发现无需修复。平均修复时间为19个月(范围0.6 - 99个月)。40例患者中,24例(60%)因超声监测结果接受了TIPS检查和/或修复,而16例(40%)因症状复发接受了检查或修复。在34例TIPS修复中,28例(83%)仅涉及血管成形术,5例(15%)采用支架辅助,1例因插管未成功而失败。修复手术的总体技术成功率为94%(32/34)。一年通畅率约为57%。平均透视时间为16.1分钟(范围:3.7 - 52.5分钟)。术后恢复时间最短,平均为一至两小时。未观察到重大并发症(0%,0/40)。1例患者(2.5%,1/40)出现轻微并发症(穿刺部位血肿),2例患者在30天内因与手术无关的原因住院。结论 TIPS修复可在门诊机构成功且安全地进行。