• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次胆囊支架置入与二次胆囊支架置入后胆囊炎的复发率:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Recurrence rate of cholecystitis after initial gallbladder stenting versus secondary gallbladder stenting: A propensity score matching study.

作者信息

Nakabayashi Ryota, Kamada Hideki, Ono Masahiro, Kono Toshiaki, Fujita Naoki, Yamana Hiroki, Kobayashi Kiyoyuki, Tani Joji, Ando Yasuhisa, Suto Hironobu, Oshima Minoru, Okano Keiichi, Kobara Hideki

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology Institute of Medicine Kagawa University Kagawa Japan.

Division of Innovative Medicine for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatology Institute of Medicine Kagawa University Kagawa Japan.

出版信息

DEN Open. 2024 Dec 26;5(1):e70047. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70047. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/deo2.70047
PMID:39726985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11670053/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Limitations are sometimes encountered in the application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) has emerged as an additional option. However, the long-term stent patency remains an issue. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of primary and secondary EGBS.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients who underwent preplanned EGBS because of poor surgical tolerance from January 2006 to July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the initial EGBS group, in which EGBS was performed as the first option ( = 37), and the secondary EGBS group, in which EGBS was performed following other treatments ( = 24). The primary endpoint was the 3-month recurrence rate, and the secondary endpoint was the technical success rate. Propensity score matching was performed to align the patients' background factors between the two groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, six patients from each group were selected for analysis. The technical success rate was significantly higher in the secondary EGBS group (73.0% [27/37] vs. 95.8% [23/24], respectively). Furthermore, the 3-month recurrence rate was significantly higher in the initial than secondary EGBS group (66.7% [4/6] vs. 0.0% [0/6], respectively;  = 0.0232).

CONCLUSION

Secondary EGBS may effectively prevent recurrent cholecystitis in patients with poor surgical tolerance.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜胆囊切除术应用于急性胆囊炎的治疗时,有时会遇到局限性。内镜下胆囊支架置入术(EGBS)已成为一种额外的选择。然而,支架的长期通畅性仍然是一个问题。本研究旨在比较原发性和继发性EGBS的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2006年1月至2023年7月因手术耐受性差而接受预先计划的EGBS的61例患者。患者分为初始EGBS组(n = 37),即EGBS作为首选治疗方法;以及继发性EGBS组(n = 24),即EGBS在其他治疗之后进行。主要终点是3个月复发率,次要终点是技术成功率。进行倾向评分匹配以平衡两组患者的背景因素。

结果

倾向评分匹配后,每组各选择6例患者进行分析。继发性EGBS组的技术成功率显著更高(分别为73.0% [27/37]和95.8% [23/24])。此外,初始EGBS组的3个月复发率显著高于继发性EGBS组(分别为66.7% [4/6]和0.0% [0/6];P = 0.0232)。

结论

继发性EGBS可能有效预防手术耐受性差的患者复发性胆囊炎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/fe0c04772c67/DEO2-5-e70047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/6479e65be3e4/DEO2-5-e70047-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/ca714869e01a/DEO2-5-e70047-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/42fd5d2fc6f5/DEO2-5-e70047-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/ce024b350b3c/DEO2-5-e70047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/fe0c04772c67/DEO2-5-e70047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/6479e65be3e4/DEO2-5-e70047-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/ca714869e01a/DEO2-5-e70047-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/42fd5d2fc6f5/DEO2-5-e70047-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/ce024b350b3c/DEO2-5-e70047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f11/11670053/fe0c04772c67/DEO2-5-e70047-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Recurrence rate of cholecystitis after initial gallbladder stenting versus secondary gallbladder stenting: A propensity score matching study.初次胆囊支架置入与二次胆囊支架置入后胆囊炎的复发率:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
DEN Open. 2024 Dec 26;5(1):e70047. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70047. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Elective Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Gallbladder Stenting for Acute Cholecystitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.内镜下胆囊支架置入术治疗急性胆囊炎后择期胆囊切除术:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Apr 1;34(2):171-177. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001252.
3
Permanent endoscopic gallbladder stenting versus removal of gallbladder drainage, long-term outcomes after management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients for cholecystectomy: Multi-center retrospective cohort study.永久性内镜下胆囊支架置入术与胆囊引流管拔除术治疗高危胆囊切除手术患者急性胆囊炎的长期疗效:多中心回顾性队列研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Dec;28(12):1138-1146. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.967. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Long-Term Impact of Endoscopic Gallbladder Stenting for Calculous Cholecystitis in Poor Surgical Candidates: A Multi-center Comparative Study.内镜下胆囊支架置入术对手术风险高的结石性胆囊炎患者的长期影响:一项多中心对照研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1529-1538. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07651-0. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
5
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis (with videos).内镜胆囊支架置入术治疗伴有胆石症的高危手术患者的长期疗效(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):905-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.072. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
6
A retrospective comparative study of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage versus endoscopic gallbladder stenting on the clinical course of acute cholecystitis: A propensity score matching analysis using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan.经皮经肝胆道引流术与内镜下胆囊支架置入术治疗急性胆囊炎临床过程的回顾性比较研究:一项基于日本全国住院患者数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Mar;32(3):203-211. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12114. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
7
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage using a novel spiral plastic stent in acute calculus cholecystitis.急性胆石性胆囊炎经内镜经乳头胆囊引流术使用新型螺旋塑料支架的长期疗效。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02610-5.
8
Endoscopic nasogallbladder tube or stent placement in acute cholecystitis: a preliminary prospective randomized trial in Japan (with videos).内镜经鼻胆囊管或支架置入术治疗急性胆囊炎:日本的一项初步前瞻性随机试验(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.046.
9
Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage versus endoscopic gallbladder stenting for managing acute cholecystitis until laparoscopic cholecystectomy.经皮经肝胆囊引流与内镜下胆囊支架置入术治疗急性胆囊炎,直至腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13253. doi: 10.1111/ases.13253. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
10
Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage versus gallbladder stenting before cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and a high suspicion of choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomised preliminary study.急性胆囊炎且高度怀疑胆总管结石患者在胆囊切除术前的内镜下鼻胆管引流与胆囊支架置入术:一项前瞻性随机初步研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(4):472-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1115116. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased difficulty and complications of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.经皮经肝胆囊引流后延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的难度和并发症增加:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 13;23(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02185-2.
2
Long-Term Impact of Endoscopic Gallbladder Stenting for Calculous Cholecystitis in Poor Surgical Candidates: A Multi-center Comparative Study.内镜下胆囊支架置入术对手术风险高的结石性胆囊炎患者的长期影响:一项多中心对照研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1529-1538. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07651-0. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
3
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Better than Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients with Acute Cholecystitis After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage.
经皮经肝胆囊引流术后老年急性胆囊炎患者行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术优于保守治疗。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3170-3177. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05067-1. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
Management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients: A propensity score-matched analysis of surgical vs. medical treatment.老年患者急性胆囊炎的治疗:手术与药物治疗的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Dec;53(12):1620-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
5
Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for the management of acute calculus cholecystitis patients unfit for urgent cholecystectomy.经内镜经胆囊管胆囊引流术治疗不适合紧急胆囊切除术的急性结石性胆囊炎患者。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240219. eCollection 2020.
6
EUS guided gallbladder drainage.超声内镜引导下胆囊引流术
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul 5;5:41. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.12.20. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors affecting technical success of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.影响内镜经乳头胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎技术成功的因素。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jul;27(7):429-436. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.744. Epub 2020 May 26.
8
Endosonography-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: an international randomised multicentre controlled superiority trial (DRAC 1).超声内镜引导下胆囊引流与经皮胆囊造口术治疗高危外科患者急性胆囊炎的比较:一项国际随机多中心对照优效性试验(DRAC 1)。
Gut. 2020 Jun;69(6):1085-1091. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319996. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Current Status in the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: Is Endoscopic Drainage Feasible?- A Systematic Review.接受抗血栓治疗的急性胆囊炎患者的治疗现状:内镜引流是否可行?——一项系统评价
Clin Endosc. 2020 Mar;53(2):176-188. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.177. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Outcomes and limitations in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage.超声内镜引导下胆囊引流的结果与局限性
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov 28;8(Suppl 1):S40-S43. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_49_19. eCollection 2019 Nov.