Thavamani Aravind, Malay Sindhoosha, Khatana Jasmine, Velayuthan Sujithra, Sankararaman Senthilkumar
Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2101 Adelbert Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2101 Adelbert Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Medicines (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;11(8):21. doi: 10.3390/medicines11080021.
: Cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a recurrent debilitating illness characterized by intense episodes of nausea and emesis with widely varied pharmacological management across the country. Aprepitant is now increasingly used in patients with CVS. The impact of aprepitant as an abortive therapy in the readmission of pediatric patients with CVS is currently unknown. : We analyzed all pediatric patients with a primary diagnosis of CVS using the ICD-10 code in the Pediatric Health Information System database of the Children's Hospital Association. We evaluated the demographic data, comorbid conditions, and management details during the inpatient stay. CVS patients who received aprepitant during their inpatient hospitalization were compared with patients without aprepitant use. Seven-day readmission rate for CVS was used as the outcome variable to assess the effectiveness of the aprepitant in aborting an episode. Propensity score matching was used to match the two cohorts. : We analyzed 1775 patients of which 96 received aprepitant during the inpatient hospitalization. The aprepitant group had a more severe hospitalization course as evidenced by an increased duration of hospital stay (5 vs. 3 days) and total hospitalization costs ($11,790 vs. $6380). There were no significant differences in the 7-day (17% vs. 16%, = 0.91) readmission rate and results were not altered by propensity score matching. : Aprepitant use as an abortive therapy did not affect the 7-day CVS-related readmission rate. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the role of aprepitant as an abortive agent in the management of CVS in the pediatric population.
周期性呕吐综合征(CVS)是一种复发性使人衰弱的疾病,其特征为剧烈的恶心和呕吐发作,在全国范围内药物治疗差异很大。阿瑞匹坦目前越来越多地用于CVS患者。阿瑞匹坦作为一种中止治疗药物对儿科CVS患者再入院的影响目前尚不清楚。
我们使用儿童医院协会儿科健康信息系统数据库中的ICD-10编码分析了所有初步诊断为CVS的儿科患者。我们评估了住院期间的人口统计学数据、合并症和治疗细节。将住院期间接受阿瑞匹坦治疗的CVS患者与未使用阿瑞匹坦的患者进行比较。将CVS的7天再入院率作为评估阿瑞匹坦中止发作有效性的结果变量。使用倾向评分匹配法对两组进行匹配。
我们分析了1775例患者,其中96例在住院期间接受了阿瑞匹坦治疗。阿瑞匹坦组的住院病程更严重,住院时间延长(5天对3天)和总住院费用增加(11,790美元对6380美元)证明了这一点。7天再入院率没有显著差异(17%对16%,P = 0.91),倾向评分匹配后结果也没有改变。
使用阿瑞匹坦作为中止治疗药物不会影响7天CVS相关再入院率。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来探索阿瑞匹坦作为中止药物在儿科人群CVS治疗中的作用。