Suppr超能文献

亚利桑那州响尾蛇咬伤后使用抗蛇毒血清并不能直接减轻疼痛。

Antivenom Administration After Rattlesnake Envenoming in Arizona Does Not Directly Diminish Pain.

作者信息

Nielsen Vance G, Stratton Darien L, Hoelscher Tyler M, Nakamura Hannah L, Cornelison Matthew M, Rushton William F, Smelski Geoffrey T

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2024 Dec 2;16(12):521. doi: 10.3390/toxins16120521.

Abstract

The onset, progression, and severity of pain following rattlesnake envenomation are highly variable between patients. Pain can be severe and persistent, seemingly refractory to opioid analgesics. The ability of antivenom to directly relieve pain has not been well studied. We reviewed poison center charts of rattlesnake envenomations between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2022. Demographic data as well as details of antivenom usage and pain severity were collected. Patients were coded in one of three categories: without pain (Pain 0), well controlled pain (Pain 1), and opioid refractory pain (Pain 2). A total of 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 140 receiving Anavip antivenom and 149 receiving Crofab. Patient characteristics were different between both cohorts. There were no significant differences in the number of Anavip vials used between the Pain 1 and Pain 2 groups. However, patients in the Crofab Pain 2 group received more antivenom compared to Pain 1. Importantly, Pain 3 patients were treated with the highest amount of antivenom in both the Crofab and Anavip cohorts. Despite the higher doses of antivenom used, these patients also experienced the greatest pain. These data suggest that antivenom alone may have minimal analgesic benefits.

摘要

响尾蛇咬伤后疼痛的发作、进展和严重程度在患者之间差异很大。疼痛可能严重且持续,似乎对阿片类镇痛药无效。抗蛇毒血清直接缓解疼痛的能力尚未得到充分研究。我们回顾了2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间响尾蛇咬伤的中毒控制中心图表。收集了人口统计学数据以及抗蛇毒血清使用细节和疼痛严重程度。患者被分为三类之一:无痛(疼痛0级)、疼痛得到良好控制(疼痛1级)和阿片类药物难治性疼痛(疼痛2级)。共有289名患者符合纳入标准,其中140人接受了Anavip抗蛇毒血清治疗,149人接受了Crofab治疗。两个队列的患者特征不同。疼痛1级和疼痛2级组之间使用的Anavip瓶数没有显著差异。然而,与疼痛1级组相比,Crofab疼痛2级组的患者接受了更多的抗蛇毒血清。重要的是,在Crofab和Anavip队列中,疼痛3级患者接受的抗蛇毒血清量最高。尽管使用了更高剂量的抗蛇毒血清,但这些患者也经历了最严重的疼痛。这些数据表明,单独使用抗蛇毒血清可能只有最小的镇痛效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49e7/11728520/2097a163113d/toxins-16-00521-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验