Li Huilin, Li Danfeng, Liu Liping, Yang Tian, Li Yuqian, Tan Jiali
Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 27;29(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06066-7.
To compare the variations in the upper airway of children with skeletal Class II mandibular retrognathism treated with van Beek Headgear-Activator (vBHGA) and Twin-Block (TB) appliances.
40 children were involved in this retrospective study and divided into two intervention groups: the vBHGA group and the TB group, each comprising 20 individuals with an average age of 11.13 years. Employing Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Geometric Morphometric analysis, a comprehensive assessment of the upper airway's volume, minimum cross-sectional area (m-CSA), and 3D shape characteristics was conducted pre-and post-treatment.
The total volume, oropharynx volume, oropharynx m-CSA, and hypopharynx m-CSA significantly increased in both the vBHGA and TB groups (p < 0.05). The sole discrepancy between the two groups was observed in comparing the nasopharynx m-CSA (p < 0.05). A morphological difference was observed in the vBHGA group before and after treatment (p < 0.05), characterized by a wider and shorter airway, positioning of the posterior nasal spine closer to the anterior inferior area, and a more posterior nasopharyngeal wall. However, there were no significant shape differences between the two groups or before and after treatment within the TB group.
It appears that both vBHGA and TB interventions contribute positively to alleviating upper airway constriction. Nonetheless, the vBHGA group exhibits more alterations in the configuration of the nasopharynx.
Both orthodontic appliances have a positive impact on the upper airway but still have differences, emphasizing the need for individualized consideration when selecting orthodontic interventions.
This study was also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR2400086867.
比较使用范·贝克头帽-肌激动器(vBHGA)和双阻板矫治器(TB)治疗的骨性II类下颌后缩儿童上气道的变化。
40名儿童参与了这项回顾性研究,分为两个干预组:vBHGA组和TB组,每组各20人,平均年龄11.13岁。采用锥形束计算机断层扫描和几何形态计量分析,在治疗前后对上气道的容积、最小横截面积(m-CSA)和三维形状特征进行了全面评估。
vBHGA组和TB组的总体积、口咽容积、口咽m-CSA和下咽m-CSA均显著增加(p < 0.05)。两组之间唯一的差异在于比较鼻咽m-CSA时(p < 0.05)。vBHGA组治疗前后观察到形态学差异(p < 0.05),其特征为气道更宽、更短,后鼻棘更靠近前下区域,鼻咽壁更靠后。然而,TB组两组之间以及治疗前后均无显著的形状差异。
似乎vBHGA和TB干预均对缓解上气道狭窄有积极作用。尽管如此,vBHGA组在鼻咽形态方面表现出更多变化。
两种正畸矫治器对上气道均有积极影响,但仍存在差异,强调在选择正畸干预措施时需要个体化考虑。
本研究也在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ChiCTR2400086867。