Suppr超能文献

三种不同评分系统对预测直径大于20毫米肾结石逆行性肾内手术成功率的比较

Comparison of three different scoring systems in predicting success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in kidney stones larger than 20 millimeters.

作者信息

Alma Ergun, Özbilen Mert Hamza, Altunkol Adem, Anıl Hakan, Ercil Hakan

机构信息

Department of Urology, Health Sciences University, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Medicalpark Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Dec 27;43(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05415-1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate stone free rate (SFR) predictivity of three different scoring systems in patients with kidney stones larger than 20 millimeters undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery(RİRS).

METHODS

Digital records of a total of 166 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Epidemiological characteristics (age, gender, medical history) of the patients, stone and affected kidney characteristics (size, volume, location, density, opaque, presence of urinary system anomaly, presence of stones in different calyx, number of stones, lower pole stone, renal infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), renal infundibulopelvic length (RIL), hydronephrosis), and operative characteristics (preoperative ureteral stent, operation duration, postoperative residual fragments, hospitalization time and complications were recorded. Each patient was scored separately according to the Resorlu-Unsal Scoring System (RUSS), the modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) and R.I.R.S scoring systems based on the stone characteristics seen on CT.

RESULTS

All three methods had statistically acceptable sensitivity and specificity values. Sensitivity for R.I.R.S nomogram is 62.3%, specificity is 77.1% (cut-off: 7.5 points, area under the curve (AUC):0.735, p < 0.001), sensitivity for RUSS nomogram is 60.7%, specificity is 77.9% (cut off: 2.5, AUC = 0.749, p < 0.001), sensitivity for the Modified S-ReSC nomogram was determined as 65.6% and specificity as 71.2% (cut off: 2.5, AUC = 0.743, p < 0.001). The residual stone ratio was found to be higher in the presence of lower pole stone. While the cut-off value for IPA was 44.5°, this value was calculated as 24.5 mm for RIL.

CONCLUSION

Three scoring systems demonstrate accceptable sensitivity and specificity in predicting stone free rate(SFR) with stones ≥ 20 mm. Multivariate analysis highlighted the superiority of the R.I.R.S. scoring system for SFR predictivity. In the presence of lower pole stones, IPA and RIL are important factors in predicting surgical success.

摘要

目的

评估三种不同评分系统对接受逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)的肾结石直径大于20毫米患者的无石率(SFR)预测能力。

方法

回顾性分析了总共166例患者的数字记录。记录患者的流行病学特征(年龄、性别、病史)、结石和患肾特征(大小、体积、位置、密度、不透光性、泌尿系统异常情况、不同肾盏结石情况、结石数量、下极结石、肾漏斗肾盂角(IPA)、肾漏斗肾盂长度(RIL)、肾积水)以及手术特征(术前输尿管支架、手术时长、术后残留碎片、住院时间和并发症)。根据CT所见的结石特征,分别按照雷索卢-厄恩萨尔评分系统(RUSS)、改良的首尔国立大学肾结石复杂性评分系统(S-ReSC)和RIRS评分系统对每位患者进行评分。

结果

所有三种方法在统计学上均具有可接受的敏感性和特异性值。RIRS列线图的敏感性为62.3%,特异性为77.1%(截断值:7.5分,曲线下面积(AUC):0.735,p < 0.001);RUSS列线图的敏感性为60.7%,特异性为77.9%(截断值:2.5,AUC = 0.749,p < 0.001);改良S-ReSC列线图的敏感性确定为65.6%,特异性为71.2%(截断值:2.5,AUC = 0.743,p < 0.001)。发现存在下极结石时残留结石率更高。IPA的截断值为44.5°,RIL的该值经计算为24.5毫米。

结论

三种评分系统在预测直径≥20毫米结石的无石率(SFR)方面表现出可接受的敏感性和特异性。多变量分析突出了RIRS评分系统在SFR预测能力方面的优越性。存在下极结石时,IPA和RIL是预测手术成功的重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验