Baratto C, Dewachter C, Forton K, Muraru D, Gagliardi M F, Tomaselli M, Gavazzoni M, Perego G B, Senni M, Bondue A, Badano L P, Parati G, Vachiéry J L, Caravita S
Department of Cardiology, Ospedale San Luca IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano, Italy; Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Dalmine BG, Italy.
Department of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Académique Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Jun;44(6):916-926. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.12.022. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
Right ventricular (RV) reserve has been linked to exercise capacity and prognosis in cardiopulmonary diseases. However, evidence in this setting is limited, due to the complex shape and load dependency of the RV. We sought to study RV adaptation to exercise by simultaneous three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) and right heart catheterization (RHC).
Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) underwent simultaneous supine rest/exercise RHC-3DE. They were subdivided based on RV ejection fraction (EF) changes: (1) exhausted RV reserve, RVEF-; (2) preserved RV reserve, RVEF+.
Sixty percent of patients were RVEF-. Distribution of HFpEF/PVD, as well as RV volumes and RVEF at rest were similar in the 2 groups. Hemodynamic metrics of RV afterload, as well as their exercise-induced changes, were similar in the 2 groups. During exercise, RV end-diastolic volume increased more in RVEF- than in RVEF+ (29±29 vs 7±25 ml, p<0.05). RV end-systolic volume increased by 21[12;31] ml in RVEF- and decreased by 8[-15;1] ml in RVEF+ (p<0.001). RV-pulmonary artery coupling was lower in RVEF- at peak exercise (p<0.05). Peak RVEF was associated with left ventricular preload (R=0.14, p=0.011). Cardiac output increased less in RVEF- than in RVEF+ (+2.3±2.0 vs +4.0±2.4 liter/min, p<0.05). Peak RVEF was associated with oxygen consumption (p<0.01).
Exhausted RV reserve, as evaluated by 3DE, was frequent in HFpEF and PVD, was relatively independent from classical afterload parameters, was associated with RV-pulmonary artery decoupling, RV dilation, enhanced ventricular interdependence, and cardiac limitation to exercise. Intrinsic RV dysfunction may contribute to exhausted RV reserve.
右心室(RV)储备与心肺疾病的运动能力和预后相关。然而,由于右心室复杂的形状和负荷依赖性,这方面的证据有限。我们试图通过同步三维超声心动图(3DE)和右心导管检查(RHC)来研究右心室对运动的适应性。
射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)或肺血管疾病(PVD)患者接受同步仰卧位休息/运动时的RHC-3DE检查。根据右心室射血分数(EF)变化将他们分组:(1)右心室储备耗竭,RVEF-;(2)右心室储备保留,RVEF+。
60%的患者为RVEF-。两组中HFpEF/PVD的分布以及静息时右心室容积和RVEF相似。两组右心室后负荷的血流动力学指标及其运动诱导的变化相似。运动期间,RVEF-组的右心室舒张末期容积增加比RVEF+组更多(29±29 vs 7±25 ml,p<0.05)。RVEF-组右心室收缩末期容积增加21[12;31] ml,而RVEF+组减少8[-15;1] ml(p<0.001)。运动峰值时RVEF-组的右心室-肺动脉耦合较低(p<0.05)。峰值RVEF与左心室前负荷相关(R=0.14,p=0.011)。RVEF-组的心输出量增加比RVEF+组少(+2.3±2.0 vs +4.0±2.4升/分钟,p<0.05)。峰值RVEF与耗氧量相关(p<0.01)。
通过3DE评估,右心室储备耗竭在HFpEF和PVD中很常见,相对独立于经典的后负荷参数,与右心室-肺动脉解耦、右心室扩张、增强的心室相互依赖以及运动时的心脏限制有关。右心室内在功能障碍可能导致右心室储备耗竭。