Gregory David J, Han Feifei, Li Peng, Gritsenko Marina A, Kyle Jennifer, Riley Frank E, Chavez Deborah, Yotova Vania, Sindeaux Renata H M, Hawash Mohamed B F, Xu Fengyun, Hung Li-Yuan, Hayden Douglas L, Tompkins Ronald G, Lanford Robert E, Kobzik Lester, Hellman Judith, Jacobs Jon M, Barreiro Luis B, Xiao Wenzhong, Warren H Shaw
Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mol Med. 2024 Dec 28;30(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s10020-024-01052-x.
Vertebrates differ over 100,000-fold in responses to pro-inflammatory agonists such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), complicating use of animal models to study human sepsis or inflammatory disorders. We compared transcriptomes of resting and LPS-exposed blood from six LPS-sensitive species (rabbit, pig, sheep, cow, chimpanzee, human) and four LPS-resilient species (mice, rats, baboon, rhesus), as well as plasma proteomes and lipidomes. Unexpectedly, at baseline, sensitive species already had enhanced expression of LPS-responsive genes relative to resilient species. After LPS stimulation, maximally different genes in resilient species included genes that detoxify LPS, diminish bacterial growth, discriminate sepsis from SIRS, and play roles in autophagy and apoptosis. The findings reveal the molecular landscape of species differences in inflammation. This may inform better selection of species for pre-clinical models and could lead to new therapeutic strategies that mimic mechanisms in inflammation-resilient species to limit inflammation without causing immunosuppression.
脊椎动物对促炎激动剂(如细菌脂多糖,LPS)的反应差异超过10万倍,这使得利用动物模型研究人类败血症或炎症性疾病变得复杂。我们比较了六种LPS敏感物种(兔子、猪、绵羊、牛、黑猩猩、人类)和四种LPS耐受物种(小鼠、大鼠、狒狒、恒河猴)在静息状态和暴露于LPS后的血液转录组,以及血浆蛋白质组和脂质组。出乎意料的是,在基线时,敏感物种相对于耐受物种已经具有增强的LPS反应基因表达。在LPS刺激后,耐受物种中差异最大的基因包括使LPS解毒、减少细菌生长、区分败血症和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)以及在自噬和凋亡中起作用的基因。这些发现揭示了炎症中物种差异的分子格局。这可能有助于为临床前模型更好地选择物种,并可能导致新的治疗策略,这些策略模仿炎症耐受物种中的机制来限制炎症而不引起免疫抑制。