Benedum Corey M, Sarkar Somnath, Bozkurt Selen, Bhagat Ruma, Richie Nicole, Lavery Bea, Griffith Sandra D
Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;117(4):1051-1060. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3543. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
Clinical research has historically failed to include representative levels of historically underrepresented populations and these inequities continue to persist. Ensuring representativeness in clinical trials is crucial for patients to receive clinically appropriate treatment and have equitable access to novel therapies; enhancing the generalizability of study results; and reducing the need for post-marketing commitments focused on underrepresented groups. As demonstrated by recent legislation and guidance documents, regulatory agencies have shown an increased interest in understanding how novel therapies will impact the patient population that will receive them. Despite these efforts, a systematic approach to measure and optimize representativeness remains underdeveloped. Here, we introduce the novel Population Optimization, Representativeness Evaluation, and Fine-tuning Framework, designed to quantify and enhance representativeness. Our framework includes methods for evaluating overall and subgroup representativeness, identifying drivers of non-representativeness, and optimizing eligibility criteria to achieve representative populations. We demonstrate our framework by selecting patients who met the eligibility criteria for nine oncology clinical trials from a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database and quantifying the representativeness of each trial's eligible population. This framework addresses gaps in current literature by providing a comprehensive, data-driven approach to enhance the representativeness of clinical trials, thereby supporting regulatory and internal decision-making processes. This framework is adaptable to various disease indications and can be extended to evaluate enrolled study samples, ensuring that clinical trials are representative.
从历史上看,临床研究一直未能纳入代表性水平的历史上代表性不足的人群,这些不平等现象仍然存在。确保临床试验的代表性对于患者接受临床适当的治疗并公平获得新疗法至关重要;提高研究结果的可推广性;并减少针对代表性不足群体的上市后承诺的必要性。正如最近的立法和指导文件所表明的那样,监管机构对了解新疗法将如何影响接受这些疗法的患者群体表现出了越来越浓厚的兴趣。尽管做出了这些努力,但衡量和优化代表性的系统方法仍未得到充分发展。在此,我们介绍了新颖的人群优化、代表性评估和微调框架,旨在量化和提高代表性。我们的框架包括评估总体和亚组代表性的方法、识别非代表性的驱动因素以及优化入选标准以实现代表性人群。我们通过从全国范围内源自电子健康记录的去识别数据库中选择符合九项肿瘤学临床试验入选标准的患者,并量化每项试验合格人群的代表性,来展示我们的框架。该框架通过提供一种全面的、数据驱动的方法来提高临床试验的代表性,从而支持监管和内部决策过程,解决了当前文献中的空白。该框架适用于各种疾病适应症,并且可以扩展到评估已入组的研究样本,以确保临床试验具有代表性。