Ponsioen Theodorus, Hashimoto Yohei, Invernizzi Alessandro, Gabrielle Pierre-Henry, Lavid Francisco Javier, Mehta Hemal, Silva Rufino, Jaross Nandor, Squirrell David, O'Toole Louise, Kusenda Pavol, Barthelmes Daniel, Gillies Mark, Hunt Adrian
Department of Ophthalmology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
The Save Sight Institute, Sydney Medical School, the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 May-Jun;53(4):409-420. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14490. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
We aimed to describe a 2-year outcome of eyes managed by practitioners benchmarked using a funnel plot by their frequency of treatment using vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for naive retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
A multicentre, international, observational study of 29 doctors in 12 countries managing 1110 eyes with RVO commencing VEGF inhibitors between 1 January 2012-2022 tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry.
We identified 3 outlying 'intensive' practitioners (managing 350/1110 eyes [32%]), 22 'typical' practitioners (604/1110, [54%]) and 4 outlying 'relaxed' practitioners (156/1110, [14%]) with respective 24-month outcomes in Branch and Central RVO including the primary outcome, mean adjusted change in visual acuity (VA) in BRVO: +16.2, +13.6, +9.3 letters (p < 0.01) and CRVO: +14.2, +12.7, +4.8 letters (p < 0.01); adjusted change in macular thickness in BRVO -179, -150, -159 μm (p < 0.01) and CRVO -324, -283, -232 μm (p < 0.01); time-in-range with VA > 68 letters in BRVO 90, 78, 68 weeks (p < 0.01) and CRVO 69, 60, 54 weeks (p = 0.04); median injections 18, 13 and 10; median final injection intervals, BRVO 6, 9, 10 weeks and CRVO 6, 9 and 12 weeks; with no significant difference in adverse outcomes.
At 24 months, the intensive practitioners were treating RVO using VEGF inhibitors with twice the frequency of the relaxed practitioners; however, their patients had gained twice (BRVO) to three times (CRVO) more letters of VA.
我们旨在描述由从业者管理的眼睛在2年时的预后情况,这些从业者根据使用血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂治疗初发性视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)的频率,通过漏斗图进行基准评估。
一项多中心、国际性的观察性研究,涉及12个国家的29名医生,他们管理了1110只患有RVO的眼睛,于2012年1月1日至2022年期间开始使用VEGF抑制剂,并在“抗击视网膜失明!”登记处进行跟踪。
我们确定了3名处于外围的“积极”从业者(管理350/1110只眼睛[32%])、22名“典型”从业者(604/1110只,[54%])和4名处于外围的“宽松”从业者(156/1110只,[14%]),其在分支和中央RVO中的24个月预后情况,包括主要预后指标,即分支视网膜静脉阻塞(BRVO)中平均调整后的视力(VA)变化:+16.2、+13.6、+9.3个字母(p<0.01),以及中央视网膜静脉阻塞(CRVO):+14.2、+12.7、+4.8个字母(p<0.01);BRVO中黄斑厚度的调整变化为-179、-150 和 -159μm(p<0.01),CRVO为-324、-283、-232μm(p<0.01);BRVO中视力>68个字母的达标时间为第90、78、68周(p<0.01),CRVO为第69、60、54周(p=0.04);注射次数中位数分别为18、13和10次;最终注射间隔中位数,BRVO为6、9、10周,CRVO为6、9和12周;不良预后方面无显著差异。
在24个月时,积极从业者使用VEGF抑制剂治疗RVO的频率是宽松从业者的两倍;然而,他们的患者获得的视力提高字母数是宽松从业者患者的两倍(BRVO)至三倍(CRVO)。