Suppr超能文献

在急诊科使用高敏肌钙蛋白评估改良HEART评分用于低风险胸痛患者

Assessing modified HEART scores with high-sensitivity troponin for low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

作者信息

Holmes Katherine A, Ralston Samuel A, Phillips Daniel, Jose Jeffy, Milis Liana, Cheeti Radhika, Muirheid Timothy, Wang Hao

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA.

Department of Information Technology, JPS Health Network, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):923-929. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03845-8. Epub 2024 Dec 28.

Abstract

The accuracy of using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) scores with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) to risk stratify emergency department (ED) chest pain patients remains uncertain. We aim to compare the performance accuracy of determining major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among three modified HEART (mHEART) scores with the use of hs-cTn to risk stratify ED chest pain patients. This retrospective single-center observational study included ED patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who had HEAR scores calculated and at least one hs-cTnI result. Various hs-cTnI parameters, including 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL, i.e., positive, ≥ 53 ng/l for females and ≥ 78 ng/l for males), limit of quantitation (LoQ, i.e., negative: < 20 ng/l), and limit of detection (LoD, < 3 ng/l), were used to calculate a troponin score (T-score). Patients with a T-score of 0 or mHEART score of 0-3 were considered low risk. The study compared the accuracy of different mHEART scores in predicting 30-day and 180-day MACE outcomes. A total of 10,495 patients were included, with 337 (3.21%) and 647 (6.16%) experiencing 30-day and 180-day MACE. The 30-day MACE rates were 0.53%, 1.37%, and 2.00% for patients whose hs-cTnI was beyond the cutoffs of LoD, LoQ, and URL, respectively. However, when low risk was defined as an mHEART score of 0-3, the 30-day MACE rates ranged from 0.33 to 0.62% across different mHEART scores. The mHEART score for risk stratification of low-risk chest pain patients shows acceptable accuracy in predicting MACE outcomes.

摘要

使用HEART(病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白)评分结合高敏心肌肌钙蛋白(hs-cTn)对急诊科(ED)胸痛患者进行风险分层的准确性仍不确定。我们旨在比较三种改良HEART(mHEART)评分结合hs-cTn在对ED胸痛患者进行风险分层时确定主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的性能准确性。这项回顾性单中心观察性研究纳入了疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的ED患者,这些患者计算了HEAR评分且至少有一项hs-cTnI结果。使用了各种hs-cTnI参数,包括第99百分位上限参考值(URL,即阳性,女性≥53 ng/l,男性≥78 ng/l)、定量限(LoQ,即阴性:<20 ng/l)和检测限(LoD,<3 ng/l)来计算肌钙蛋白评分(T评分)。T评分为0或mHEART评分为0 - 3的患者被视为低风险。该研究比较了不同mHEART评分在预测30天和180天MACE结局方面的准确性。总共纳入了10495名患者,其中337名(3.21%)和647名(6.16%)经历了30天和180天的MACE。hs-cTnI分别超过LoD、LoQ和URL临界值的患者30天MACE发生率分别为0.53%、1.37%和2.00%。然而,当将低风险定义为mHEART评分为0 - 3时,不同mHEART评分的30天MACE发生率在0.33%至0.62%之间。用于低风险胸痛患者风险分层的mHEART评分在预测MACE结局方面显示出可接受的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验