• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受欢迎与被喜欢:目标、行为与规范显著性

Being Popular and Being Liked: Goals, Behaviors, and Norm Salience.

作者信息

Jones Martin H, Špes Tanja, Hsiao Yu-Yu, Markovič Rene, Košir Katja

机构信息

University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May;54(5):1238-1249. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02129-w. Epub 2024 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-024-02129-w
PMID:39731660
Abstract

Youth's social status (popularity and likability) relates with social status goals as well as bullying and prosocial behaviors within the context of classroom norms for bullying and prosocial behaviors, but less clear is how each of these factors interrelates with each other. The current study empirically analyses the concurrent relationships among social status goals, bullying and prosocial behaviors, and classroom norms with social status. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 6,421 Slovenian early adolescents (50% females; M = 13 years; SD = 6 months). Findings indicated that popularity goals were related to bullying behaviors and bullying behaviors were related to popularity. In contrast, likability goals are related to prosocial behaviors, and prosocial behaviors are related to popularity and likability. The role of classroom norm salience was complex as bullying increased popularity in low-bullying environments, whereas prosocial behaviors enhanced likability in high prosocial classroom contexts. Students high on both bullying and prosocial behaviors (bistrategic controllers) demonstrated higher popularity and likability compared to their peers., but had similar relationships among their social status goals, bullying, prosocial behaviors, and social status as all other peers. The findings demonstrate a clear relationship among social status goals, bullying and prosocial behaviors, and social status (popularity and likability), while suggesting that classroom norms may differentiate how bullying/prosocial behaviors might align with social status.

摘要

青少年的社会地位(受欢迎程度和亲和力)与社会地位目标以及在欺凌和亲社会行为的课堂规范背景下的欺凌行为和亲社会行为相关,但这些因素之间如何相互关联尚不清楚。当前的研究实证分析了社会地位目标、欺凌行为和亲社会行为以及课堂规范与社会地位之间的并发关系。参与者是来自斯洛文尼亚的6421名青少年早期学生的全国代表性样本(50%为女性;平均年龄13岁;标准差6个月)。研究结果表明,受欢迎目标与欺凌行为相关,而欺凌行为与受欢迎程度相关。相比之下,亲和力目标与亲社会行为相关,亲社会行为与受欢迎程度和亲和力相关。课堂规范显著性的作用较为复杂,因为在低欺凌环境中欺凌行为会提高受欢迎程度,而在高亲社会行为的课堂环境中亲社会行为会增强亲和力。与同龄人相比,在欺凌行为和亲社会行为方面都表现突出的学生(双策略控制者)表现出更高的受欢迎程度和亲和力,但他们在社会地位目标、欺凌行为、亲社会行为和社会地位之间的关系与所有其他同龄人相似。研究结果表明社会地位目标、欺凌行为和亲社会行为以及社会地位(受欢迎程度和亲和力)之间存在明确的关系,同时表明课堂规范可能会区分欺凌/亲社会行为与社会地位的匹配方式。

相似文献

1
Being Popular and Being Liked: Goals, Behaviors, and Norm Salience.受欢迎与被喜欢:目标、行为与规范显著性
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May;54(5):1238-1249. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02129-w. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
2
The Role of Prosocial and Aggressive Popularity Norm Combinations in Prosocial and Aggressive Friendship Processes.亲社会和攻击性受欢迎规范组合在亲社会和攻击性友谊发展过程中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar;49(3):645-663. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01088-x. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
The Silver Lining in the Dark Cloud of Social Status Insecurity: The Mediating Role of Popularity Goals in the Association Between Social Status Insecurity and Chinese Adolescents' Bullying Bystander Behaviors.社会地位不安全感的乌云中的一线希望:受欢迎目标在社会地位不安全感与中国青少年欺凌旁观者行为之间的中介作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15851-NP15873. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023489. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Forms of Prosocial Behaviors are Differentially Linked to Social Goals and Peer Status in Adolescents.亲社会行为的形式与青少年的社会目标和同伴地位存在不同程度的关联。
J Genet Psychol. 2018 Nov-Dec;179(6):329-342. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1518894. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Who Sets the Aggressive Popularity Norm in Classrooms? It's the Number and Strength of Aggressive, Prosocial, and Bi-Strategic Adolescents.谁在课堂上设定了激进的受欢迎规范?是具有攻击性、亲社会和双策略的青少年的数量和实力。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00571-0.
6
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
7
Adolescents' social status goals: relationships to social status insecurity, aggression, and prosocial behavior.青少年的社会地位目标:与社会地位不安全感、攻击性和亲社会行为的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jan;43(1):146-60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9939-z. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
8
Joint Developmental Trajectories of Likability and Popularity: Associations with Social Behavior among Chinese Adolescents.受欢迎程度与亲和力的联合发展轨迹:与中国青少年社会行为的关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Apr;52(4):866-879. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01736-3. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
9
Who Are Popular, Liked, and Admired? Longitudinal Associations between Three Social Status and Academic-Social Behavior.谁更受欢迎、更受喜爱和更受钦佩?三种社会地位与学习-社会行为之间的纵向关联。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Sep;49(9):1783-1792. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01222-0. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
A Test of the Bistrategic Control Hypothesis of Adolescent Popularity.青少年流行的双策略控制假说检验。
Child Dev. 2020 May;91(3):e635-e648. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13269. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research.偏好和声望作为不同形式的地位:对20年研究的元分析综述。
J Adolesc. 2020 Oct;84:78-95. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Bidirectional Associations between Popularity, Popularity Goal, and Aggression, Alcohol Use and Prosocial Behaviors in Adolescence: A 3-Year Prospective Longitudinal Study.青少年受欢迎程度、受欢迎目标与攻击行为、酒精使用及亲社会行为之间的双向关联:一项为期3年的前瞻性纵向研究
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Feb;50(2):298-313. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01308-9. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
The Adolescent Peer Relations Instrument- Bully/Target: Measurement Invariance Across Gender, Age, and Clinical Status.
青少年同伴关系量表-欺凌/受欺凌对象:跨性别、年龄和临床状态的测量不变性
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):1484-1513. doi: 10.1177/0886260520922350. Epub 2020 May 31.
4
Why Interventions to Influence Adolescent Behavior Often Fail but Could Succeed.为何干预青少年行为的措施常常失败,但又可能成功。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;13(1):101-122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617722620. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
Popularity differentially predicts reactive and proactive aggression in early adolescence.受欢迎程度对青少年早期的反应性攻击和主动性攻击有不同的预测作用。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):29-40. doi: 10.1002/ab.21603. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Social goals, aggression, peer preference, and popularity: longitudinal links during middle school.社会目标、攻击性、同伴偏好与受欢迎程度:中学阶段的纵向联系
Dev Psychol. 2014 Aug;50(8):2134-43. doi: 10.1037/a0037137. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
7
The role of popularity goal in early adolescents' behaviors and popularity status.受欢迎目标在青少年早期行为和受欢迎状态中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Feb;50(2):489-97. doi: 10.1037/a0032999. Epub 2013 May 20.
8
Adolescents' social status goals: relationships to social status insecurity, aggression, and prosocial behavior.青少年的社会地位目标:与社会地位不安全感、攻击性和亲社会行为的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jan;43(1):146-60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9939-z. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
9
Beyond the class norm: bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection.超越班级规范:受欢迎青少年的欺凌行为及其与同伴接纳和排斥的关系。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Nov;36(8):1289-99. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9251-7.
10
Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction.潜在交互作用的结构方程模型:替代估计策略与指标构建的评估
Psychol Methods. 2004 Sep;9(3):275-300. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275.