• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏好和声望作为不同形式的地位:对20年研究的元分析综述。

Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research.

作者信息

van den Berg Yvonne H M, Lansu Tessa A M, Cillessen Antonius H N

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, 6525 HR, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Adolesc. 2020 Oct;84:78-95. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010
PMID:32891019
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A systematic meta-analysis was conducted of the association between preference and popularity across childhood and adolescence. The role of development, sex, and region of the world were examined.

METHOD

The analysis was conducted on 135 samples including 136,014 participants. The samples were divided by age (upper grades primary school, k = 41; lower grades secondary school, k = 72; upper grades secondary school, k = 22) and region (North America, k = 54; Europe, k = 66; China, k = 10).

RESULTS

Across all samples, a moderate positive association between preference and popularity was found (r = 0.45). The association was significantly weaker in the upper grades of secondary school (r = 0.37) than in the lower grades of secondary school (r = 0.47) or the upper grades of primary school (r = 0.47). The association was weaker for girls (r = 0.26) than for boys (r = 0.38) in the upper grades of secondary school. The association was weaker in European samples (r = 0.41) than in those from North America (r = 0.50) and China (r = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirmed that preference and popularity are related but distinct dimensions of adolescent peer status. The association differed significantly by age, sex, and region of the world. Further research should examine additional factors that explain the variability in the association between preference and popularity.

摘要

引言

对儿童期和青少年期偏好与受欢迎程度之间的关联进行了系统的荟萃分析。研究了发育、性别和世界区域的作用。

方法

对135个样本进行分析,包括136,014名参与者。样本按年龄(小学高年级,k = 41;初中低年级,k = 72;初中高年级,k = 22)和区域(北美,k = 54;欧洲,k = 66;中国,k = 10)进行划分。

结果

在所有样本中,发现偏好与受欢迎程度之间存在中等程度的正相关(r = 0.45)。这种关联在初中高年级(r = 0.37)明显弱于初中低年级(r = 0.47)或小学高年级(r = 0.47)。在初中高年级,女孩(r = 0.26)的这种关联比男孩(r = 0.38)弱。欧洲样本中的这种关联(r = 0.41)比北美(r = 0.50)和中国(r = 0.57)的样本弱。

结论

结果证实,偏好和受欢迎程度是青少年同伴地位相关但不同的维度。这种关联在年龄、性别和世界区域上存在显著差异。进一步的研究应考察解释偏好与受欢迎程度之间关联变异性的其他因素。

相似文献

1
Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research.偏好和声望作为不同形式的地位:对20年研究的元分析综述。
J Adolesc. 2020 Oct;84:78-95. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
A healthy peer status: Peer preference, not popularity, predicts lower systemic inflammation in adolescence.健康的同伴地位:同伴偏好而非受欢迎程度预测青少年的系统性炎症较低。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Nov;109:104402. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104402. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
School engagement trajectories in adolescence: The role of peer likeability and popularity.青少年时期的学校参与轨迹:同伴可爱度和受欢迎程度的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Oct;64:61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
An Examination of Reciprocal Associations Between Social Preference, Popularity, and Friendship during Early Adolescence.青少年早期社会偏好、受欢迎程度和友谊之间的互惠关系研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1830-1841. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0846-1. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
Social goals, aggression, peer preference, and popularity: longitudinal links during middle school.社会目标、攻击性、同伴偏好与受欢迎程度:中学阶段的纵向联系
Dev Psychol. 2014 Aug;50(8):2134-43. doi: 10.1037/a0037137. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
6
Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Social Status: The Moderating Role of Gender.青少年攻击行为、亲社会行为和社会地位的友谊动态:性别调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Nov;46(11):2305-2320. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
7
It's Lonely at the Top: Adolescent Students' Peer-perceived Popularity and Self-perceived Social Contentment.高处不胜寒:青少年学生的同伴感知受欢迎程度和自我感知的社交满意度。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Feb;48(2):341-358. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0970-y. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: selection and influence dynamics.流行文化与青少年友谊网络:选择与影响动态。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jul;49(7):1242-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030098. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics.儿童和青少年时期在学校和网络环境中同伴侵害的防御行为:个体和同伴关系特征的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Sep;145(9):891-928. doi: 10.1037/bul0000205. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Best Friend's Popularity: Associations with Psychological Well-Being and School Adjustment in China During Early Adolescence.挚友的受欢迎程度:与中国青少年早期心理健康和学校适应的关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Mar;52(3):670-683. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01719-w. Epub 2022 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Defender Subgroups and Their Classroom Distribution Patterns in Chinese Adolescents: A Social-Ecological Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis.识别中国青少年中的防御者亚组及其课堂分布模式:一项社会生态多层次潜在剖面分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02255-z.
2
Being Popular and Being Liked: Goals, Behaviors, and Norm Salience.受欢迎与被喜欢:目标、行为与规范显著性
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May;54(5):1238-1249. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02129-w. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
3
Children's friendship stability in the United States, China, and Indonesia: Associations with individual attributes and dyadic similarity.
美国、中国和印度尼西亚儿童友谊的稳定性:与个体特质及二元相似性的关联。
Child Dev. 2025 Mar-Apr;96(2):591-605. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14189. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
4
How peer status and ability track shape behavioral disengagement over the transition from primary to secondary school.同伴地位和能力如何影响从小学到中学过渡期间的行为脱离。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1403-1419. doi: 10.1111/jora.13006. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
5
Do Adolescents Adopt the Prosocial Behaviors of the Classmates They Like? A Social Network Analysis on Prosocial Contagion.青少年会效仿他们喜欢的同学的亲社会行为吗?一项关于亲社会行为传播的社会网络分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan;54(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02037-z. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
Heterogeneity of adolescent bullying perpetrators: Subtypes based on victimization and peer status.青少年欺凌者的异质性:基于受害和同伴地位的亚类型。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Sep;34(3):1018-1034. doi: 10.1111/jora.12986. Epub 2024 May 29.
7
Identifying who adolescents prefer as source of information within their social network.确定青少年在其社交网络中更喜欢谁作为信息来源。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 20;13(1):20277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46994-0.
8
Why adolescents conform to high-status peers: Associations among conformity, identity alignment, and self-esteem.青少年为何迎合高地位同伴:从众、身份认同一致性与自尊的关系。
Child Dev. 2024 May-Jun;95(3):879-894. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14038. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
9
Clique Hierarchy Moderates the Association between Social Preference and Defending Behaviors in Early Adolescence: The Role of Gender Differences.社会偏好与青少年早期防御行为的关系受群体层次结构的调节:性别差异的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Nov;52(11):2285-2299. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01825-3. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
10
Moderating effect of classroom sociable norm on the relations between unsociability and internalizing problems in Chinese adolescents.课堂社交规范对中国青少年不合群与内化问题之间关系的调节作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 8;14:1168342. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1168342. eCollection 2023.