• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在股腘血管腔内介入治疗中使用缝合介导闭合装置进行顺行股动脉穿刺

Antegrade Femoral Puncture Using a Suture-Mediated Closure Device in Infrainguinal Endovascular Interventions.

作者信息

Mastrorilli Davide, Forcella Edoardo, Miccoli Tommaso, De Massari Chiara, Garriboli Luca

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar, VR, Italy.

Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar, VR, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;112:246-252. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.040. Epub 2024 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.040
PMID:39732328
Abstract

BACKGROUND

ProGlide is a suture-mediated vascular closure device (VCD) indicated for retrograde access closure at the common femoral artery (CFA). However, its off-label use for antegrade and/or superficial femoral artery (SFA) access has become common in many practices. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ProGlide for femoral artery access closure in patients undergoing antegrade infrainguinal endovascular procedures.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed data from patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who underwent peripheral angioplasty between January 2017 and December 2023. The inclusion criteria were infrainguinal PAD disease, Rutherford classification 3 to 6, the use of an endovascular approach, and access performed through the ipsilateral antegrade femoral artery. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and technical success of the Perclose ProGlide closure device during antegrade percutaneous endovascular procedures. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative and postoperative inguinal and vascular complications.

RESULTS

A total of 301 participants were included in the study. All patients were classified according to the clinical categories of chronic limb ischemia: 111 patients (37%) had severe claudication (class 3) with walking distances of less than 20 meters, 42 patients (14%) had at least one limb with ischemic rest pain (class 4), and 148 patients (49%) had at least one limb with ischemic tissue loss (class 5 or 6). A 6 Fr introducer was used in the majority of cases (88%), with a mean hospital stay of 1.5 ± 0.5 days. Technical success was achieved in 298 patients (99%), and there were no early deaths. A total of 33 hematomas were identified, with 5 patients having major complications. One of these was treated with conservative management, while 4 patients required further interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of using the ProGlide single VCD for antegrade femoral puncture during infrainguinal endovascular interventions. The safety of its deployment can be further optimized by routinely utilizing ultrasound (US) guidance.

摘要

背景

ProGlide是一种缝线介导的血管闭合装置(VCD),适用于股总动脉(CFA)逆行穿刺部位的闭合。然而,在许多临床实践中,其在顺行和/或股浅动脉(SFA)穿刺部位的超适应证使用已变得很常见。本研究评估了ProGlide在接受顺行性腹股沟下血管腔内手术患者中用于股动脉穿刺部位闭合的有效性和安全性。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们分析了2017年1月至2023年12月期间接受外周血管成形术的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的数据。纳入标准为腹股沟下PAD疾病、卢瑟福分类3至6级、采用血管腔内入路以及通过同侧顺行股动脉进行穿刺。本研究的主要终点是评估Perclose ProGlide闭合装置在顺行性经皮血管腔内手术中的有效性和技术成功率。次要终点包括术中和术后腹股沟及血管并发症。

结果

共有301名参与者纳入本研究。所有患者均根据慢性肢体缺血的临床分类进行分组:111例患者(37%)有严重间歇性跛行(3级),步行距离小于20米;42例患者(14%)至少有一条肢体出现静息痛(4级);148例患者(49%)至少有一条肢体出现缺血性组织丢失(5级或6级)。大多数病例(88%)使用6F穿刺鞘,平均住院时间为1.5±0.5天。298例患者(99%)实现技术成功,无早期死亡病例。共发现33例血肿,5例患者出现严重并发症。其中1例采用保守治疗,4例患者需要进一步干预。

结论

这项回顾性研究证明了在腹股沟下血管腔内干预期间使用ProGlide单一VCD进行顺行股动脉穿刺的可行性和安全性。通过常规使用超声(US)引导可进一步优化其应用的安全性。

相似文献

1
Antegrade Femoral Puncture Using a Suture-Mediated Closure Device in Infrainguinal Endovascular Interventions.在股腘血管腔内介入治疗中使用缝合介导闭合装置进行顺行股动脉穿刺
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;112:246-252. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.040. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Comparison between antegrade common femoral artery access and superficial femoral artery access in infrainguinal endovascular interventions.经股浅动脉入路与经股总动脉入路在下肢腔内血管介入治疗中的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):763-770. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Access Via Large-Bore Sheaths (22-26F Diameter) in Endovascular Therapy.经大口径鞘管(22-26F 直径)行血管内治疗的疗效和安全性。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Dec;31(6):1173-1179. doi: 10.1177/15266028231161490. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.基于夹子与缝线介导的血管闭合用于股动脉穿刺止血的安全性和有效性:一项比较StarClose和ProGlide装置的前瞻性随机单中心研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):402-407. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27116. Epub 2017 May 13.
5
Superficial Femoral Artery Access for Infrainguinal Antegrade Endovascular Interventions in the Hostile Groin: A Prospective Randomized Study.股浅动脉入路在复杂腹股沟区经皮腔内血管重建中的应用:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;86:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
6
Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients.经皮顺行股总动脉入路使用 Angio-Seal 装置闭合的疗效和安全性:在 1889 例糖尿病患者严重肢体缺血介入治疗中的应用经验。
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;17(3):366-75. doi: 10.1583/09-2960.1.
7
FemoSeal Device Use for Femoral Artery Closure by Different Techniques.采用不同技术使用FemoSeal装置进行股动脉闭合
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;51:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Sheath Size Up and Down With Single Proglide - A Technique for Achieving Hemostasis With Use of Large Size Delivery System During Endovascular Graft Placement.使用单根Proglide血管缝合器上下调整鞘管尺寸——一种在血管内移植物置入过程中使用大尺寸输送系统实现止血的技术。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;78:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Arterial Closure Devices Following Antegrade Femoral Access: A Case-Control Study.经股动脉顺行入路后动脉闭合装置的安全性和有效性:一项病例对照研究。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020 Oct;54(7):612-617. doi: 10.1177/1538574420941298. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Prophylactic Retrograde Distal Common Femoral Access as a Bail-out Strategy in Patients with Increased Risk for Femoral Access Complication During Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.预防性逆行股总动脉远端入路作为经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术中股动脉入路并发症风险增加患者的补救策略。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Apr;21(4):481-485. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 15.