HIV感染者中耶氏肺孢子菌肺炎治疗方案的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析

Comparative efficacy and safety of treatment regimens for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in people living with HIV: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Hatzl Stefan, Posch Florian, Scholz Laura, Geiger Christina, Kriegl Lisa, Kreuzer Philipp, Eller Philipp, Giacobbe Daniele Roberto, Bassetti Matteo, Hoenigl Martin, Krause Robert

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.

Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 May;31(5):713-723. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.12.024. Epub 2024 Dec 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a serious opportunistic infection in people living with HIV (PWH) who have low CD4 counts. Despite its side effects, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is currently considered the primary treatment for PCP.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy (treatment failure and mortality) and tolerability (treatment change) of PCP treatment regimens with a frequentist network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources include Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL from inception to 3 February 2024.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Study eligibility criteria include comparative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least two PCP treatment regimens.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants include PWH.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions include treatment regimens for PCP compared head-to-head.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Assessment of risk of bias includes Cochrane Risk-of-bias tool for RCTs (Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2).

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Title, abstract, and full-text screening, along with data extraction, were conducted by two independent reviewers. Data on PCP treatment failure, all-cause mortality, and discontinuation because of toxicity were pooled and ranked.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs conducted between 1983 and 1996 included 1788 participants across 27 treatment arms. No regimen showed statistically significant superiority over TMP-SMX in direct comparison. In the network meta-analysis, clindamycin/primaquine was ranked the best (surface under the cumulative ranking curve, 0.8), followed by intravenous pentamidine (0.8) and TMP-SMX (0.8) regarding treatment failure. Regarding all-cause mortality, TMP-SMX was superior to atovaquone in direct comparison, but no treatment was superior in the full network analysis. Dapsone-TMP (0.7) and intravenous pentamidine (0.8) were ranked the highest for mortality reduction. For safety and tolerability, comparator drugs consistently outperformed TMP-SMX, with significant reductions in toxicity observed for dapsone-TMP, inhaled pentamidine, and atovaquone. Inhaled pentamidine (0.9) was the best tolerated, followed by trimetrexate (0.8) and atovaquone (0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that TMP-SMX should be reassessed as the standalone first-line therapy for PCP in PWH, given the better tolerability and comparable efficacy of other treatments. In places with access to alternative drugs for PCP treatment, our analysis suggests that alternative regimens may offer comparable effectiveness, providing flexibility to use alternative treatments when comorbidities necessitate it.

摘要

背景

耶氏肺孢子菌肺炎(PCP)是CD4细胞计数低的艾滋病病毒感染者(PWH)中一种严重的机会性感染。尽管有副作用,但甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)目前被认为是PCP的主要治疗方法。

目的

本研究的目的是通过频率学派网状荟萃分析比较PCP治疗方案的疗效(治疗失败和死亡率)和耐受性(治疗方案改变)。

数据来源

数据来源包括从创刊到2024年2月3日的Embase、Medline和CENTRAL。

研究纳入标准

研究纳入标准包括至少两种PCP治疗方案的比较随机对照试验(RCT)。

参与者

参与者包括艾滋病病毒感染者。

干预措施

干预措施包括PCP治疗方案的直接头对头比较。

偏倚风险评估

偏倚风险评估包括用于RCT的Cochrane偏倚风险工具(Cochrane偏倚风险2)。

数据合成方法

由两名独立的评审员进行标题、摘要和全文筛选以及数据提取。汇总并排列关于PCP治疗失败、全因死亡率和因毒性而停药的数据。

结果

1983年至1996年进行的14项RCT包括27个治疗组中的1788名参与者。在直接比较中,没有一种方案显示出在统计学上优于TMP-SMX。在网状荟萃分析中,就治疗失败而言,克林霉素/伯氨喹被评为最佳(累积排序曲线下面积,0.8),其次是静脉注射喷他脒(0.8)和TMP-SMX(0.8)。就全因死亡率而言,在直接比较中TMP-SMX优于阿托伐醌,但在整个网状分析中没有一种治疗方法更具优势。氨苯砜-TMP(0.7)和静脉注射喷他脒(0.8)在降低死亡率方面排名最高。对于安全性和耐受性,对照药物始终优于TMP-SMX,氨苯砜-TMP、吸入性喷他脒和阿托伐醌的毒性显著降低。吸入性喷他脒(0.9)耐受性最佳,其次是三甲曲沙(0.8)和阿托伐醌(0.8)。

结论

我们得出结论,鉴于其他治疗方法具有更好的耐受性和相当的疗效,应重新评估TMP-SMX作为艾滋病病毒感染者PCP的单一一线治疗方法。在有PCP替代药物可用的地方,我们的分析表明替代方案可能具有相当的有效性,当合并症需要时可灵活使用替代治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索