Hosseini-Siyanaki Mohammadreza, Sagdic Hakki Serdar, Raviprasad Abheek G, Munjerin Sefat E, Prodigios Joice C, Anthony Evelyn Y, Hochhegger Bruno, Forghani Reza
Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.).
Radiomics and Augmented Intelligence Laboratory (RAIL), Department of Radiology and the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (M.H-S., H.S.S., A.G.R., S.E.M., J.C.P., E.Y.A., B.H., R.F.).
Acad Radiol. 2025 May;32(5):2953-2965. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.049. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
To evaluate and compare image quality of different energy levels of virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) using standard versus strong deep learning spectral reconstruction (DLSR) on dual-energy CT pulmonary angiogram (DECT-PA).
A retrospective study was performed on 70 patients who underwent DECT-PA (15 PE present; 55 PE absent) scans. VMIs were reconstructed at different energy levels ranging from 35 to 200 keV using standard and strong levels with deep learning spectral reconstruction. Quantitative assessment was performed using region of interest (ROI) analysis of eleven different anatomical areas, measuring absolute attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In addition, CNR of clot compared to normally opacified lumen was calculated in cases that were positive for PE. For qualitative analysis, four different keV levels (40-60-80-100) were evaluated.
The image noise was significantly lower, and the cardiovascular SNR (24.9 ± 5.85 vs. 21.98 ± 5.49) and CNR (23.72 ± 8.00 vs. 20.31 ± 6.44) were significantly higher, on strong Deep Learning Spectral reconstruction (DLSR) than standard DLSR (p < 0.0001). PE-specific CNR (8.58 ± 4.47 vs. 6.25 ± 3.19) was significantly higher on strong DLSR than standard (p < 0.0001). The subjective image quality scores were diagnostically acceptable at four different keV levels (40-60-80-100 keV) evaluated using both standard and strong DLSR, with no qualitative differences observed at those energies.
Strong DLSR improves image quality with an increase of the SNR and CNR in DECT-PA compared to standard DLSR.
在双能CT肺血管造影(DECT-PA)中,使用标准与强化深度学习光谱重建(DLSR)评估并比较不同能量水平的虚拟单色图像(VMI)的图像质量。
对70例行DECT-PA扫描的患者(其中15例存在肺栓塞;55例无肺栓塞)进行回顾性研究。使用标准和强化深度学习光谱重建,在35至200 keV的不同能量水平重建VMI。通过对11个不同解剖区域进行感兴趣区(ROI)分析,测量绝对衰减、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR),进行定量评估。此外,在肺栓塞阳性的病例中,计算血栓与正常显影管腔的CNR。对于定性分析,评估了四个不同的keV水平(40-60-80-100)。
与标准DLSR相比,强化深度学习光谱重建(DLSR)的图像噪声显著更低,心血管SNR(24.9±5.85对21.98±5.49)和CNR(23.72±8.00对20.31±6.44)显著更高(p<0.0001)。强化DLSR的肺栓塞特异性CNR(8.58±4.47对6.25±3.19)显著高于标准DLSR(p<0.0001)。使用标准和强化DLSR评估的四个不同keV水平(40-60-80-100 keV)的主观图像质量评分在诊断上均可接受,在这些能量水平上未观察到定性差异。
与标准DLSR相比,强化DLSR可提高DECT-PA的图像质量,增加SNR和CNR。