Suppr超能文献

硝苯地平在心力衰竭中的变力性、血管及神经内分泌作用:与硝普钠的比较

Inotropic, vascular and neuroendocrine effects of nifedipine in heart failure: comparison with nitroprusside.

作者信息

Fifer M A, Colucci W S, Lorell B H, Jaski B E, Barry W H

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Mar;5(3):731-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80402-2.

Abstract

To evaluate the short-term hemodynamic and neuroendocrine effects of nifedipine in heart failure, it was compared with nitroprusside, a balanced vasodilator without known inotropic effect, in equihypotensive doses during right and left heart catheterization in nine patients with heart failure. Mean arterial pressure decreased from 89 +/- 12 to 76 +/- 14 mm Hg with nitroprusside, and from 90 +/- 12 to 75 +/- 13 mm Hg with sublingual nifedipine. Right atrial, pulmonary artery, pulmonary capillary wedge and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures decreased significantly with nitroprusside, but not with nifedipine. Cardiac index and stroke volume index increased to a similar extent with both drugs; in contrast, stroke work index increased significantly with nitroprusside, but not with nifedipine. Peak rate of left ventricular pressure development (dP/dt) (measured with a micromanometer-tipped catheter in seven patients) was unchanged with nitroprusside, but decreased significantly with nifedipine (747 +/- 292 to 639 +/- 238 mm Hg/s; p less than 0.002). There was no change in heart rate with either medication. Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations were not altered significantly by either drug. Plasma renin activity was not changed by nitroprusside infusion, but was increased after the administration of nifedipine. Thus, in contrast to the balanced vasodilator action of nitroprusside, the effect of nifedipine is predominantly on the arterial circulation. In these patients with heart failure, reflex sympathetic stimulation did not occur in response to a decrease in systemic arterial pressure by either vasodilator. A negative inotropic effect occurred after the administration of nifedipine, but not nitroprusside.

摘要

为评估硝苯地平在心力衰竭患者中的短期血流动力学及神经内分泌效应,研究人员将其与硝普钠(一种无已知变力作用的平衡血管扩张剂)进行了比较。研究选取了9例心力衰竭患者,在左右心导管插入术期间给予等降压剂量的两种药物。使用硝普钠时,平均动脉压从89±12毫米汞柱降至76±14毫米汞柱;使用舌下含服硝苯地平时,平均动脉压从90±12毫米汞柱降至75±13毫米汞柱。使用硝普钠后,右心房压、肺动脉压、肺毛细血管楔压和左心室舒张末期压力均显著下降,而使用硝苯地平后这些压力未下降。两种药物均可使心脏指数和每搏量指数有相似程度的增加;相比之下,硝普钠可使每搏功指数显著增加,而硝苯地平则无此作用。左心室压力上升最大速率(dP/dt)(7例患者使用微测压导管测量)在使用硝普钠后未改变,但使用硝苯地平后显著下降(从747±292降至639±238毫米汞柱/秒;p<0.002)。两种药物均未使心率发生改变。两种药物均未显著改变血浆去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素浓度。输注硝普钠后血浆肾素活性未改变,但使用硝苯地平后血浆肾素活性增加。因此,与硝普钠的平衡血管扩张作用不同,硝苯地平的作用主要在动脉循环。在这些心力衰竭患者中,两种血管扩张剂导致体循环动脉压下降时均未引发反射性交感神经刺激。使用硝苯地平后出现了负性变力作用,而使用硝普钠后未出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验