• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海洋保护区对海带食草作用的潜在适得其反效应。

Potential backfiring effects of Marine Protected Areas on kelp herbivory.

作者信息

Reis B, Arenas F, Sánchez-Gallego Á, Marques A F S, Sousa-Pinto I, Franco J N

机构信息

CIIMAR/CIMAR-LA ‑Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450‑208, Matosinhos, Portugal.

Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 1021 1055, Porto, 4169-007, Portugal.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82557-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-82557-7
PMID:39732882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11682423/
Abstract

The management and creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) is currently under great focus, with international organisations aiming to protect 30% of our oceans by 2030. The success of MPAs depends on a nuanced understanding of local ecological dynamics and threats, which can significantly influence ecosystem balance. Herbivory can be a stressor for foundation species, namely kelp forests, contributing to their decline in several regions of the globe. However, the dynamics inherent to herbivory and MPA's implementation are still poorly understood. Here, the impact of protection status, depth, kelp species, and grazer type on herbivory (occurrence, rate, and grazer frequency) was assessed through a comprehensive experimental approach involving tethering experiments and faunal characterisation of macro-herbivores. The research was conducted in habitats off the central coast of Portugal: Peniche (PEN) and the MPA Berlengas Archipelago (MPA-BER). Our findings revealed that herbivory occurrence and rate are higher within the MPA, especially at greater depths. Instead of urchins, fish are the significant contributors to kelp consumption, showing a preference for the kelp S. polyschides. Results provide the first experimental evidence in the Atlantic region identifying fish as the dominant herbivores driving increased kelp biomass loss, a relationship potentially magnified by MPA implementation. Hence, protection status may not benefit all ecosystem components, enhancing the need for robust MPA management to balance trophic interactions and support biodiversity and ecosystem resilience.

摘要

海洋保护区(MPA)的管理与创建目前备受关注,国际组织的目标是到2030年保护30%的海洋。海洋保护区的成功取决于对当地生态动态和威胁的细致理解,这些因素会显著影响生态系统平衡。食草作用可能会给基础物种(即海带森林)带来压力,导致其在全球多个地区数量减少。然而,食草作用和海洋保护区实施所固有的动态变化仍未得到充分理解。在此,通过一项综合实验方法评估了保护状态、深度、海带种类和食草动物类型对食草作用(发生率、速率和食草动物频率)的影响,该方法包括系留实验和大型食草动物的动物区系特征分析。研究在葡萄牙中部海岸的栖息地进行:佩尼切(PEN)和海洋保护区贝伦加斯群岛(MPA - BER)。我们的研究结果表明,在海洋保护区内,尤其是在更深的深度,食草作用的发生率和速率更高。鱼类而非海胆是海带消耗的主要贡献者,它们表现出对多叶海带的偏好。研究结果提供了大西洋地区首个实验证据,确定鱼类是导致海带生物量损失增加的主要食草动物,这种关系可能因海洋保护区的实施而被放大。因此,保护状态可能并非对所有生态系统组成部分都有益,这凸显了加强海洋保护区管理以平衡营养相互作用、支持生物多样性和生态系统恢复力的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/568c27b9de74/41598_2024_82557_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/13dc37d94794/41598_2024_82557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/b54a727400fe/41598_2024_82557_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/661ba508b76c/41598_2024_82557_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/4979aa9e06fe/41598_2024_82557_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/4236321eaba9/41598_2024_82557_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/6596f379c3e3/41598_2024_82557_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/0b89b729e09b/41598_2024_82557_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/568c27b9de74/41598_2024_82557_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/13dc37d94794/41598_2024_82557_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/b54a727400fe/41598_2024_82557_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/661ba508b76c/41598_2024_82557_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/4979aa9e06fe/41598_2024_82557_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/4236321eaba9/41598_2024_82557_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/6596f379c3e3/41598_2024_82557_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/0b89b729e09b/41598_2024_82557_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92c/11682423/568c27b9de74/41598_2024_82557_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Potential backfiring effects of Marine Protected Areas on kelp herbivory.海洋保护区对海带食草作用的潜在适得其反效应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82557-7.
2
A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems.海洋保护区网络并不能为沿海生态系统在海洋热浪中提供群落结构的恢复力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Oct;29(19):5634-5651. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16862. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Marine Protected Areas That Preserve Trophic Cascades Promote Resilience of Kelp Forests to Marine Heatwaves.保护营养级联的海洋保护区可增强海带森林对海洋热浪的恢复力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Dec;30(12):e17620. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17620.
4
Forecasting ocean acidification impacts on kelp forest ecosystems.预测海洋酸化对大型藻类森林生态系统的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0236218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236218. eCollection 2021.
5
Marine protected areas can be useful but are not a silver bullet for kelp conservation.海洋保护区可能有用,但并非保护巨藻的灵丹妙药。
J Phycol. 2024 Apr;60(2):203-213. doi: 10.1111/jpy.13446. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
6
Exploitation and recovery of a sea urchin predator has implications for the resilience of southern California kelp forests.海胆捕食者的开发与恢复对南加州海带森林的恢复力具有影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 22;282(1799):20141817. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1817.
7
Limited differences in fish and benthic communities and possible cascading effects inside and outside a protected marine area in Sagres (SW Portugal).葡萄牙西南部萨格里什一个受保护海域内外鱼类和底栖生物群落的有限差异及可能的级联效应
Mar Environ Res. 2016 Mar;114:12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
8
Indirect food web interactions: sea otters and kelp forest fishes in the Aleutian archipelago.间接食物网相互作用:阿留申群岛的海獭与海带森林鱼类
Oecologia. 2006 Jan;146(4):623-31. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0230-1. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
9
Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas.在温带海洋保护区网络中,海带森林动物的恢复轨迹迅速,但在空间上存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 16;5:14102. doi: 10.1038/srep14102.
10
Using predictive models to identify kelp refuges in marine protected areas for management prioritization.利用预测模型识别海洋保护区中的海带避难所,以确定管理优先级。
Ecol Appl. 2025 Jan;35(1):e3084. doi: 10.1002/eap.3084.

本文引用的文献

1
Marine protected areas can be useful but are not a silver bullet for kelp conservation.海洋保护区可能有用,但并非保护巨藻的灵丹妙药。
J Phycol. 2024 Apr;60(2):203-213. doi: 10.1111/jpy.13446. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
2
Marine protected areas promote stability of reef fish communities under climate warming.海洋保护区促进了珊瑚礁鱼类社区在气候变暖下的稳定性。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 28;15(1):1822. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44976-y.
3
Evaluating the long term effectiveness of a Mediterranean marine protected area to tackle the effects of invasive and range expanding herbivorous fish on rocky reefs.
评估地中海海洋保护区在应对入侵和扩散食草鱼类对石礁影响方面的长期有效性。
Mar Environ Res. 2024 Jan;193:106293. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106293. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
4
Rapid tropicalization evidence of subtidal seaweed assemblages along a coastal transitional zone.沿海岸过渡带的亚潮带海藻组合的快速热带化证据。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 20;13(1):11720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38514-x.
5
Long-term marine protection enhances kelp forest ecosystem stability.长期的海洋保护能增强大型藻类森林生态系统的稳定性。
Ecol Appl. 2023 Oct;33(7):e2895. doi: 10.1002/eap.2895. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
6
No-take marine protected areas enhance the benefits of kelp-forest restoration for fish but not fisheries.禁捕海洋保护区提高了海带林恢复对鱼类的益处,但对渔业没有影响。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Jul;25(7):1665-1675. doi: 10.1111/ele.14023. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Microclimate predicts kelp forest extinction in the face of direct and indirect marine heatwave effects.小气候预测在直接和间接海洋热浪效应的影响下,巨藻林将灭绝。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Oct;32(7):e2673. doi: 10.1002/eap.2673. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
8
After 15 years, no evidence for trophic cascades in marine protected areas.15年后,没有证据表明海洋保护区存在营养级联效应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 24;288(1945):20203061. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3061. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
A global network of marine protected areas for food.为食物建立一个全球性的海洋保护区网络。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 10;117(45):28134-28139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000174117. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Effects of Heat Waves and Light Deprivation on Giant Kelp Juveniles (Macrocystis pyrifera, Laminariales, Phaeophyceae).热浪和光照缺失对巨藻幼体(巨藻,马尾藻目,褐藻门)的影响。
J Phycol. 2020 Aug;56(4):880-894. doi: 10.1111/jpy.13000. Epub 2020 May 29.