Yang Jia, Wu Xuan, Zhang Qianqian, Lin Chenchen, Yu Yi, Zhang Xinyan, Liu Hongmei, An Yunxia
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Weiwu Road No. 7, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82806-9.
To evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and galactomannan (GM) testing in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and to compare mNGS with other diagnostic approaches (serum/bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-GM and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) including sputum smears and culture, BALF fungal culture, and bronchial brushing). In all, 237 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 120 patients with IPA and 117 with non-IPA pulmonary infections treated at Henan Provincial People's Hospital between June 2021 and February 2024. The diagnostic performance of mNGS was compared to conventional diagnostic methods including serum GM, BALF-GM, sputum smear microscopy, sputum culture, bronchial brushings, and BALF culture. The proportion of patients with underlying diseases was significantly higher in the IPA group than in the non-IPA group (P < 0.05). Compared to conventional diagnostic methods for IPA, mNGS showed higher diagnostic efficacy, with a sensitivity of 92.5% and a specificity of 94.02%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for BALF-GM for diagnosing IPA was 0.8, with an optimal cutoff value of 0.546, sensitivity of 66.7%, and specificity of 82.1%. The combination of mNGS and BALF-GM testing further improved diagnostic performance (sensitivity of 96.67% and specificity of 78.63%). mNGS testing has excellent diagnostic efficacy for IPA, which is further enhanced by combining it with BALF-GM testing. This approach has considerable potential for the early diagnosis and targeted treatment of IPA.
评估宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)和半乳甘露聚糖(GM)检测在侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)中的诊断价值,并将mNGS与其他诊断方法(血清/支气管肺泡灌洗(BALF)-GM以及包括痰涂片和培养、BALF真菌培养和支气管刷检在内的传统微生物学检测(CMT))进行比较。本回顾性研究共纳入237例患者,其中包括2021年6月至2024年2月在河南省人民医院接受治疗的120例IPA患者和117例非IPA肺部感染患者。将mNGS的诊断性能与传统诊断方法进行比较,包括血清GM、BALF-GM、痰涂片显微镜检查、痰培养、支气管刷检和BALF培养。IPA组中合并基础疾病的患者比例显著高于非IPA组(P < 0.05)。与IPA的传统诊断方法相比,mNGS显示出更高的诊断效能,敏感性为92.5%,特异性为94.02%。BALF-GM诊断IPA的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.8,最佳临界值为0.546,敏感性为66.7%,特异性为82.1%。mNGS与BALF-GM检测相结合进一步提高了诊断性能(敏感性为96.67%,特异性为78.63%)。mNGS检测对IPA具有优异的诊断效能,与BALF-GM检测相结合可进一步增强诊断效能。这种方法在IPA的早期诊断和靶向治疗方面具有相当大的潜力。