Shi Zhixian, Zhu Guangan, Zi Zekai
College of Energy Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83322-6.
Affected by weakening effect of water in the goaf, the bearing capacity of coal pillar reduced, and coal pillar rock burst is prone to occur, which is a serious threat to mine safety in production. In order to study the equivalent width and stability of coal pillar in water-rich coal seam, taking the section coal pillar of a working face as the research object, combined with laboratory test, theoretical analysis, simulation and engineering practice, the stress, elastic core area width, damage degree and energy accumulation of 36 m water-immersed coal pillar and 26 m, 28 m, 30 m, 32 m, 36 m unimmersed coal pillars are analyzed. The research results show that: (1) The reasonable width of coal pillar under flooded and unflooded conditions is 36.09 m and 29.58 m, respectively. The width has been reduced by 6.51 m under flooded condition. The peak stress value in the goaf and the side of the working face and the range of stress curve in the elastic core area are similar between 36 m water-immersed coal pillar and 30 m unimmersed coal pillar. The bearing capacity of the two is equivalent, which is consistent with theoretical analysis. (2) The coupling relationship between flooding and damage of coal pillar can be divided into three stages with the increase of iteration times. Firstly, the flooding area in the early stage of the coal pillar is the damage area caused by the excavation working face, and the flooding rate is fast. Secondly, the mechanical parameters of the coal pillar decrease after water immersion, resulting in the increase of the damage area of the coal pillar. In turn, water permeates into the coal pillar, and the rate of immersion is slower. Finally, the flooded area of the coal pillar remains unchanged from the damaged area. (3) After the 36 m coal pillar was immersed in water, the peak stress of the side coal pillar in the goaf decreased by 7.66%. And as the number of iterations increases, the distance of the coal pillar "wedge" high energy area is gradually shortened. The damage rate experienced three stages: rapid, slow, and stopped increasing. The bearing capacity of coal pillar decreases after water immersion softening (4) The widths of the elastic core areas in the upper, middle and lower parts of the 36 m water-immersed coal pillar and 30 m unimmersed coal pillar are 20, 14.5, 12 m and 18, 14, 11 m respectively, which are relatively close and greater than the critical width of the coal pillar. The actual damage degree of both is greater than the critical damage degree. The elastic strain energy densities of coal pillars are 191 and 187 kJ/m, respectively, showing wedge-shaped distribution. The carrying capacity of 36 m water-immersed coal pillar and 30 m unimmersed coal pillar is equivalent and stable. (5) Under the geological condition, the energy accumulation and distribution form of coal pillar with a width less than 30 m is "cup-shaped". The risk of rock burst is higher. When the coal pillar is greater than 30 m, coal pillar energy is distributed in two "wedges". The stability of coal pillar is enhanced, The risk of rock burst is reduced. The research can provide a reference for determining the reasonable width of section coal pillar in the water-rich rock burst coal seam in Binchang mining area.
受采空区积水弱化作用影响,煤柱承载能力降低,易发生煤柱冲击地压,严重威胁矿井安全生产。为研究富水煤层煤柱的等效宽度及稳定性,以某工作面区段煤柱为研究对象,结合室内试验、理论分析、数值模拟及工程实践,对36m浸水煤柱和26m、28m、30m、32m、36m未浸水煤柱的应力、弹性核区宽度、损伤程度及能量积聚情况进行了分析。研究结果表明:(1) 浸水与未浸水条件下煤柱合理宽度分别为36.09m和29.58m,浸水条件下宽度减小了6.51m。36m浸水煤柱与30m未浸水煤柱采空区及工作面侧方峰值应力值、弹性核区内应力曲线范围相近,二者承载能力相当,与理论分析一致。(2) 随着迭代次数增加,煤柱浸水与损伤耦合关系可分为三个阶段。首先,煤柱前期浸水区域为掘进工作面造成的损伤区,浸水速率快;其次,煤柱浸水后力学参数降低,导致煤柱损伤区增大,进而水渗入煤柱,浸水速率变缓;最后,煤柱浸水区域与损伤区域不再变化。(3) 36m煤柱浸水后,采空区侧方煤柱峰值应力降低7.66%。且随着迭代次数增加,煤柱“楔形”高能量区距离逐渐缩短。损伤速率经历快速、缓慢、停止增长三个阶段。煤柱浸水软化后承载能力降低。(4) 36m浸水煤柱与30m未浸水煤柱上、中、下部弹性核区宽度分别为20m、14.5m、12m和18m、14m、11m,较为接近且均大于煤柱临界宽度,二者实际损伤程度均大于临界损伤程度。煤柱弹性应变能密度分别为191kJ/m和187kJ/m,呈楔形分布。36m浸水煤柱与30m未浸水煤柱承载能力相当且稳定。(5) 该地质条件下,宽度小于30m煤柱能量积聚与分布形态为“杯形”,冲击地压危险性较高;煤柱大于30m时,煤柱能量呈两个“楔形”分布,煤柱稳定性增强,冲击地压危险性降低。该研究可为彬长矿区富水冲击地压煤层区段煤柱合理宽度确定提供参考。