Suppr超能文献

可持续乡村发展:以中国西部为例实现乡村振兴的差异化路径

Sustainable rural development: differentiated paths to achieve rural revitalization with case of Western China.

作者信息

Geng Yuqing, Yang Xinlei, Zhang Naiguang, Li Jianyi, Yan Yan

机构信息

School of Business, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai, China.

Nursing Department, Guizhou Nursing Vocational College, Guizhou, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83339-x.

Abstract

Rural Revitalization (RR) is a key national strategy in China aimed at sustainable rural development and has gained significant attention. Given the unique characteristics of different villages, understanding differentiated paths to achieve RR is essential. This study introduces a new "5I Framework" (INDUS-INHAB-INDOC-INFRA-INCOM) to assess RR's overall development status (ODS) and differentiated paths. Then, using western China as a case, this study employs entropy weight, the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), and hierarchical clustering to categorize differentiated RR paths into "4L Category" (Lots-Learning-Labor-Living). Context-specific recommendations are provided for each category. "5I" and "4L" are derived from their initial letters for easier recall and global dissemination. Our findings reveal ODS's temporal fluctuations between Acceptable and Good Grades (0.3 and 0.6), with Chongqing's villages showing a downward trend (from 0.439 to 0.407); the findings also reveal spatial differences in ODS, as northern villages generally score higher due to distinct characteristics. Seven differentiated paths to RR are identified, highlighting varying dimensions essential for RR success: INFRA is crucial across all high ODS paths, while INHAB and INDOC are not always central. Besides, these paths are grouped into four clusters via hierarchical clustering, indicating that RR can be achieved by integrating "lots" of aspects, enhancing "learning" and cultural status among residents, requiring villagers' "labor" to support agriculture, or improving the "living" environment. The clustered categories enhance the applicability of our proposed countermeasures in similar contexts. The "5I Framework" facilitates theoretical understanding and evaluation of RR, while the "4L Category" underpinned by the "5I Framework" promotes effective implementation practices-both representing innovations of this study.

摘要

乡村振兴是中国一项旨在实现农村可持续发展的关键国家战略,已受到广泛关注。鉴于不同村庄的独特特征,了解实现乡村振兴的差异化路径至关重要。本研究引入了一个新的“5I框架”(产业—居住—教育—基础设施—收入)来评估乡村振兴的总体发展状况和差异化路径。然后,以中国西部为例,本研究运用熵权法、逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)、模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)和层次聚类法,将差异化的乡村振兴路径归类为“4L类别”(资源—学习—劳动力—生活)。针对每个类别提供了因地制宜的建议。“5I”和“4L”源自其首字母,便于记忆和全球传播。我们的研究结果揭示了总体发展状况在可接受等级和良好等级(0.3和0.6)之间的时间波动,重庆的村庄呈下降趋势(从0.439降至0.407);研究结果还揭示了总体发展状况的空间差异,北部村庄由于独特的特征,得分普遍较高。确定了七条乡村振兴的差异化路径,突出了乡村振兴成功所需的不同维度:基础设施在所有总体发展状况良好的路径中都至关重要,而居住和教育并非总是核心要素。此外,通过层次聚类将这些路径分为四类,这表明乡村振兴可以通过整合诸多方面、提升居民的“学习”和文化水平、依靠村民的“劳动力”来支持农业或改善“生活”环境来实现。聚类类别增强了我们提出的对策在类似背景下的适用性。“5I框架”有助于从理论上理解和评估乡村振兴,而以“5I框架”为支撑的“4L类别”则促进了有效的实施实践,二者均为本研究的创新之处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验