Suppr超能文献

比较阴道旁联合修补术与耻骨宫颈筋膜折叠术和标准阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁脱垂女性压力性尿失禁的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Comparing combined paravaginal repair with pubocervical fascia plication versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Cai Yujie, Su Ke, Bian Aiping

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Dong Road, ErQi District, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;311(1):163-173. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07864-w. Epub 2024 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is prevalent among women, often occurring alongside anterior vaginal wall prolapse. This study compares the efficacy and safety of an improved vaginal wall repair technique with pubocervical fascia fixation versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for treating SUI in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

METHODS

A single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted between September 2021 and June 2024. Women aged 40-70 years with symptomatic SUI and stage 2-3 anterior vaginal wall prolapse were randomised to either the improved repair group or the standard repair group. The primary outcome was patient-reported success at 12 months post-surgery, defined as 'very much improved' or 'much improved' on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Secondary outcomes included objective cure rates, quality of life scores, urodynamic parameters, anatomical outcomes, perioperative outcomes and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 102 women were randomised (51 in each group). At 12 months, the patient-reported success rate was significantly higher in the improved repair group (94.1% vs 78.4%, p = 0.019). The objective cure rate was also higher in the improved repair group (90.2% vs 74.5%, p = 0.038). Quality of life scores and urodynamic parameters showed greater improvements in the improved repair group. Anatomical success was achieved in 92.2% of the improved repair group compared with 80.4% in the standard repair group (p = 0.048). The improved repair technique was associated with longer operative time but lower estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stay and quicker return to normal activities. The overall complication rate was lower in the improved repair group (11.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved vaginal wall repair with pubocervical fascia fixation demonstrates superior outcomes compared with standard anterior colporrhaphy, with higher patient-reported success rates, improved quality of life and fewer complications.

摘要

背景

压力性尿失禁(SUI)在女性中很常见,常与阴道前壁脱垂同时发生。本研究比较了改良阴道壁修复技术(耻骨宫颈筋膜固定术)与标准阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁脱垂女性压力性尿失禁的疗效和安全性。

方法

于2021年9月至2024年6月进行了一项单中心、平行组、随机对照试验。将年龄在40-70岁、有症状的压力性尿失禁且阴道前壁脱垂2-3期的女性随机分为改良修复组或标准修复组。主要结局是患者报告的术后12个月成功率,定义为患者整体改善印象量表上的“非常改善”或“明显改善”。次要结局包括客观治愈率、生活质量评分、尿动力学参数、解剖学结局、围手术期结局和不良事件。

结果

共有102名女性被随机分组(每组51名)。在12个月时,改良修复组患者报告的成功率显著更高(94.1%对78.4%,p = 0.019)。改良修复组的客观治愈率也更高(90.2%对74.5%,p = 0.038)。生活质量评分和尿动力学参数在改良修复组改善更大。改良修复组的解剖学成功率为92.2%,而标准修复组为80.4%(p = 0.048)。改良修复技术与手术时间较长但估计失血量较低、住院时间较短以及恢复正常活动较快相关。改良修复组的总体并发症发生率较低(11.8%对23.5%,p = 0.043)。

结论

与标准阴道前壁修补术相比,采用耻骨宫颈筋膜固定术的改良阴道壁修复术具有更好的结局,患者报告的成功率更高,生活质量改善,并发症更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验