Suppr超能文献

在紫杉烷超敏反应预防中省略H2拮抗剂与法莫替丁的疗效比较:一项随机、前瞻性、开放标签、对照试验

Efficacy of Omitting H2 Antagonists versus Famotidine in Taxane Hypersensitivity Reactions Prophylaxis: A Randomized, Prospective, Open-Label, Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Chantharakhit Chaichana, Ruchakorn Tanarat, Theeratrakul Pathra, Pengnoraphat Buraphat

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Buddhasothorn Hospital, Chachoengsao, Thailand.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Dec 1;25(12):4333-4338. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4333.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of premedication protocols in preventing immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to taxane chemotherapy by comparing protocols that omit H2 antagonists with those that include famotidine.

METHODS

This was an open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Randomization was 1:1 to two groups. The experimental arm omitted H2 antagonists from the premedication protocol, while the control arm included famotidine. The efficacy of the premedication protocol for preventing HSRs in the experimental group was compared with that of the control group using a multilevel regression analysis with a random intercept and random effect model.

RESULTS

Between September 2022 and December 2023, 150 patients enrolled. The group without H2 antagonists had 331 cycles, averaging 3.15 per patient. The famotidine group had 327 cycles, averaging 3.39 per patient. The total number of cycles was not significantly different (p = 0.951). There were six HSRs (1.81%) in the group without H2 antagonists and five (1.53%) in the famotidine group. The HSRs risk difference between groups was 0.28% (95% CI -0.02 to 0.02, p = 1.000). A multilevel regression analysis with a random intercept and effect model compared the efficacy of premedication protocols for preventing HSRs between the experimental and control groups. The risk ratio for HSRs in the group without H2 antagonists was 1.00, which was not statistically significant compared to the famotidine group (95% CI 0.98 to 1.04, p = 0.528).

CONCLUSION

The clinical trial demonstrated that omitting the H2 antagonists premedication protocol for taxane chemotherapy is as effective in preventing HSRs as using famotidine. These findings suggest that this protocol can be implemented in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过比较省略H2拮抗剂的方案与包含法莫替丁的方案,评估预处理方案在预防紫杉烷化疗引起的速发型过敏反应(HSR)中的疗效。

方法

这是一项开放标签、单中心、随机临床试验。随机分为两组,比例为1:1。试验组在预处理方案中省略H2拮抗剂,而对照组包含法莫替丁。使用具有随机截距和随机效应模型的多水平回归分析,比较试验组和对照组预处理方案预防HSR的疗效。

结果

2022年9月至2023年12月期间,150名患者入组。无H2拮抗剂组有331个周期,平均每位患者3.15个周期。法莫替丁组有327个周期,平均每位患者3.39个周期。周期总数无显著差异(p = 0.951)。无H2拮抗剂组有6例HSR(1.81%),法莫替丁组有5例(1.53%)。两组之间HSR的风险差异为0.28%(95%CI -0.02至0.02,p = 1.000)。使用具有随机截距和效应模型的多水平回归分析比较试验组和对照组预处理方案预防HSR的疗效。无H2拮抗剂组HSR的风险比为1.00,与法莫替丁组相比无统计学意义(95%CI 0.98至1.04,p = 0.528)。

结论

该临床试验表明,紫杉烷化疗省略H2拮抗剂预处理方案在预防HSR方面与使用法莫替丁同样有效。这些发现表明该方案可在临床实践中实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/233d/12008344/37e101f1825d/APJCP-25-4333-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验