Peters Nathan, Williamson Frances, Eley Victoria
Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Sep 30;27(4):242-250. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12408. eCollection 2024 Nov.
INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: There are varying international recommendations regarding the minimum level of disinfection required for ultrasound transducers used in percutaneous procedures. While some guidelines recommend high-level disinfection (HLD), others question the additional benefit this delivers over low-level disinfection (LLD).
This narrative review identifies current guidelines and evaluates the evidence used to support disinfection recommendations for ultrasound transducers used in percutaneous procedures. Thirteen guidelines were identified using a search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google from 1st January 2013 to 31st January 2024.
No guidelines were supported by high-quality evidence, instead, guidelines relied upon: expert opinion through the application of national standards and infection control principles; consideration of recommendations from other published guidelines; and the incidence of infection from retrospective studies. Guidelines were uniformly supportive of using ultrasound transducer covers and sterile ultrasound gel during ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures. However, the minimum recommended disinfection level was varied with seven guidelines recommending HLD, four LLD and two not specifying a level. Spaulding's classification was commonly used to support disinfection recommendations, however, the resultant wide variation in classification and subsequent recommendations suggest that its utility in accurately determining the minimum level of disinfection in this specific context is low.
Without high-level evidence, using a risk-based assessment will likely remain fundamental to future guideline recommendations in determining the minimum disinfection level for an ultrasound transducer used in percutaneous procedures. This risk assessment must include the highest level of evidence available in addition to acknowledging the contribution of all steps taken to prevent infection during ultrasound-guided percutaneous procedures.
引言/目的:对于经皮操作中使用的超声换能器所需的最低消毒水平,国际上有不同的建议。虽然一些指南推荐高水平消毒(HLD),但也有其他指南质疑其相较于低水平消毒(LLD)所带来的额外益处。
本叙述性综述确定了当前的指南,并评估了用于支持经皮操作中超声换能器消毒建议的证据。通过从2013年1月1日至2024年1月31日在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和谷歌上进行检索,确定了13项指南。
没有指南得到高质量证据的支持,相反,指南依赖于:通过应用国家标准和感染控制原则得出的专家意见;对其他已发表指南建议的考虑;以及回顾性研究中的感染发生率。指南一致支持在超声引导的经皮操作中使用超声换能器套和无菌超声凝胶。然而,推荐的最低消毒水平各不相同,7项指南推荐高水平消毒,4项推荐低水平消毒,2项未指定消毒水平。斯波尔丁分类法通常用于支持消毒建议,然而,分类结果的广泛差异以及随后的建议表明,其在准确确定这一特定情况下的最低消毒水平方面的效用较低。
在缺乏高水平证据的情况下,基于风险的评估可能仍将是未来指南建议中确定经皮操作中使用的超声换能器最低消毒水平的基础。这种风险评估除了要承认在超声引导的经皮操作过程中为预防感染所采取的所有措施的贡献外,还必须包括现有最高水平的证据。