Bell Beth T, Fox Laura, Salhi Louisa, Fitton Daniel
Psychology in Education Research Centre Department of Education University of York York UK.
Kooth Digital Health, London United Kingdom and School of Psychology University of Kent Canterbury UK.
JCPP Adv. 2024 Nov 27;4(4):e12288. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12288. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Adolescents' engagement with online mental health support (e.g., apps, social media) may affect their engagement with traditional support, including in schools. However, research has typically considered engagement with online- and school-based mental health support separately meaning the mesosystemic interaction between the two is overlooked. Using co-produced exploratory qualitative methods, the present study explored adolescents' and adult stakeholders' perceptions of how and why adolescents engage with school-based and online mental health support, the interaction between these two modalities, and the associated risks and opportunities.
A youth advisory board ( = 4; Age = 18-25) co-created data collection methods, ethics procedures, and data analysis. For the main phase of data collection, 27 adolescents (Age = 15.42, = 1.58, = 12-18, = 73.1%, White = 84.6%) with mental health difficulties who had engaged with online support while at school were recruited from across England. Participants chose to participate in an interview ( = 10) or focus group ( = 17, 5 groups). In addition, interviews were conducted with 12 adult stakeholders who worked in fields related youth mental health.
Data was analysed using template analysis resulting in four themes; (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) .
Different types of support met adolescents' needs in different ways, and each offered relative strengths and weaknesses. Findings highlight how adolescents value autonomy and choice when engaging with support, using multiple different sources of support in complementary and self-directed ways to meet their needs. Several challenges were identified across settings, which could be overcome through increased collaboration. This improved collaboration has potential to improve the quality of support available to adolescents.
青少年参与在线心理健康支持(如应用程序、社交媒体)可能会影响他们参与传统支持的情况,包括在学校中的支持。然而,研究通常分别考虑参与在线和基于学校的心理健康支持,这意味着两者之间的中观系统互动被忽视了。本研究采用共同产生的探索性定性方法,探讨了青少年和成年利益相关者对青少年如何以及为何参与基于学校和在线的心理健康支持、这两种方式之间的相互作用以及相关风险和机遇的看法。
一个青年咨询委员会(n = 4;年龄 = 18 - 25岁)共同创建了数据收集方法、伦理程序和数据分析。在数据收集的主要阶段,从英格兰各地招募了27名有心理健康困难且在学校时参与过在线支持的青少年(年龄 = 15.42,标准差 = 1.58,范围 = 12 - 18岁,73.1%为女生,84.6%为白人)。参与者选择参加访谈(n = 10)或焦点小组(n = 17,共5组)。此外,还对12名从事与青少年心理健康相关领域工作的成年利益相关者进行了访谈。
使用模板分析对数据进行分析,得出四个主题;(a) ,(b) ,(c) ,(d) 。
不同类型的支持以不同方式满足了青少年的需求,每种支持都有相对的优点和缺点。研究结果突出了青少年在寻求支持时如何重视自主性和选择权,以互补和自主导向的方式使用多种不同的支持来源来满足他们的需求。在不同环境中发现了几个挑战,这些挑战可以通过加强合作来克服。这种改进的合作有可能提高为青少年提供的支持质量。