Suppr超能文献

评估ChatGPT作为获取乳房缩小手术信息的教育资源的可靠性。

Assessing ChatGPT's Reliability as an Educational Resource for Information on Breast Reduction Surgery.

作者信息

Brito Emanuella M, Bernal Isabel C, Mascaro-Pankova Andres A, Fletcher James W, Weiss Eric S, Low Christopher J, Cheung Michael C, Newman Martin I

机构信息

Surgery, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

General Surgery, Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Florida Westside Hospital, Plantation, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 28;16(11):e74698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74698. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With advances in AI and machine learning, platforms like OpenAI's ChatGPT are emerging as educational resources. While these platforms offer easy access and user-friendliness due to their personalized conversational responses, concerns about the accuracy and reliability of their information persist. As one of the most common surgical procedures performed by plastic surgeons worldwide, breast reduction surgery (BRS) offers relief for the physical and emotional burdens of large breasts. However, like any surgical procedure, it can raise a multitude of questions and anxiety.

METHODS

To evaluate the quality of medical information provided by ChatGPT in response to common patient inquiries about breast reduction surgery, we developed a 15-question questionnaire with typical patient questions about BRS. These questions were presented to ChatGPT, and the answers were compiled and presented to five board-certified plastic surgeons. Each specialist categorized the response as (1) Appropriate, the response accurately reflects current medical knowledge and best practices for BRS; (2) No, not thorough, the response lacks sufficient detail to be a helpful educational resource; (3) No, inaccurate, the response contains misleading or incorrect information.

RESULTS

A total of 75 survey responses were obtained, with five experts each analyzing 15 answers from ChatGPT. Of these, 69 (92%) responses were determined to be accurate. However, six (8%) responses were concerning to our experts: four (5.3%) lacked detail, and two (2.7%) were found to be inaccurate. Chi-square analysis revealed no statistical significance in the distribution of responses categorized as "accurate" versus "not thorough/inaccurate," and "not thorough" versus "inaccurate" (p=0.778 and p=0.306, respectively).

CONCLUSION

While ChatGPT can provide patients with basic background knowledge on BRS and empower patients to ask more informed questions during consultations, it should not replace the consultation and expert guidance of a board-certified plastic surgeon.

摘要

引言

随着人工智能和机器学习的发展,像OpenAI的ChatGPT这样的平台正成为教育资源。虽然这些平台因其个性化的对话回复而提供了便捷的访问和用户友好性,但对其信息的准确性和可靠性的担忧依然存在。作为全球整形外科医生最常进行的外科手术之一,乳房缩小术(BRS)为大乳房带来的身体和情感负担提供了缓解。然而,与任何外科手术一样,它会引发众多问题和焦虑。

方法

为了评估ChatGPT针对患者关于乳房缩小术的常见询问所提供的医学信息质量,我们制定了一份包含15个问题的问卷,这些问题都是关于BRS的典型患者问题。将这些问题呈现给ChatGPT,并整理其答案,然后提交给五位获得委员会认证的整形外科医生。每位专家将回复分类为:(1)合适,回复准确反映了当前关于BRS的医学知识和最佳实践;(2)否,不全面,回复缺乏足够细节,无法成为有用的教育资源;(3)否,不准确,回复包含误导性或错误信息。

结果

总共获得了75份调查回复,五位专家每人分析了ChatGPT的15个答案。其中,69份(92%)回复被确定为准确。然而,有6份(8%)回复引起了专家们的关注:4份(5.3%)缺乏细节,2份(2.7%)被发现不准确。卡方分析显示,在分类为“准确”与“不全面/不准确”以及“不全面”与“不准确”的回复分布中,没有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.778和p = 0.306)。

结论

虽然ChatGPT可以为患者提供关于BRS的基本背景知识,并使患者在咨询期间能够提出更有见识的问题,但它不应取代获得委员会认证的整形外科医生的咨询和专业指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcd7/11682847/eadc9746079f/cureus-0016-00000074698-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验