• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19大流行期间希腊公立医院的运营效率:基于数据包络分析和层次分析法模型的比较分析

Operational Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Greece During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA and AHP Models.

作者信息

Mitakos Athanasios, Mpogiatzidis Panagiotis

机构信息

Department of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, 50200 Ptolemaida, Greece;

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Dec 10;12(4):388-402. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12040030. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.3390/jmahp12040030
PMID:39735246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11676274/
Abstract

This study evaluates the efficiency of public hospitals in Greece during the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020, using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Faced with unprecedented pressure from increased demand for medical services, these hospitals had to adapt quickly while playing a crucial role in supporting local economies, similar to the effect of tourism on rural economies. This study reveals that, despite average efficiency scores of 83% for result-oriented models (BCC) and 65% for constant return models (CCR), inefficiencies of scale emerged under the pressures of the pandemic. The AHP, by incorporating qualitative criteria and decision-makers' preferences, offers a valuable perspective but shows little correlation with DEA's quantitative results. This research emphasizes the importance of utilizing integrated methods to formulate a more comprehensive assessment, adapted to the complex challenges of the healthcare sector during crisis periods.

摘要

本研究运用数据包络分析(DEA)和层次分析法(AHP),评估了2020年新冠疫情期间希腊公立医院的效率。面对医疗服务需求增加带来的前所未有的压力,这些医院必须迅速做出调整,同时在支持当地经济方面发挥关键作用,这类似于旅游业对农村经济的影响。该研究表明,尽管以结果为导向的模型(BCC)平均效率得分83%,规模报酬不变模型(CCR)平均效率得分65%,但在疫情压力下仍出现了规模无效率。层次分析法通过纳入定性标准和决策者偏好,提供了一个有价值的视角,但与数据包络分析的定量结果相关性不大。本研究强调了运用综合方法制定更全面评估的重要性,以适应危机时期医疗行业的复杂挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d61/11676274/81b9ebbb9e9e/jmahp-12-00030-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d61/11676274/81b9ebbb9e9e/jmahp-12-00030-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d61/11676274/81b9ebbb9e9e/jmahp-12-00030-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Operational Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Greece During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA and AHP Models.COVID-19大流行期间希腊公立医院的运营效率:基于数据包络分析和层次分析法模型的比较分析
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Dec 10;12(4):388-402. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12040030. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Sensitivity of operational and environmental benchmarks of retail stores to decision-makers' preferences through Data Envelopment Analysis.通过数据包络分析,研究零售店运营和环境基准对决策者偏好的敏感性。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137330. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137330. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
3
Efficiency of Primary Health Services in the Greek Public Sector: Evidence from Bootstrapped DEA/FDH Estimators.希腊公共部门初级卫生服务的效率:来自自举DEA/FDH估计量的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 8;12(22):2230. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12222230.
4
Hospitals' efficiency in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗医院的效率:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:126. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_393_18. eCollection 2019.
5
Evaluating the Operational Efficiency and Quality of Tertiary Hospitals in Taiwan: The Application of the EBITDA Indicator to the DEA Method and TOBIT Regression.评估台湾地区三级医院的运营效率与质量:息税折旧摊销前利润指标在数据包络分析方法及 Tobit 回归中的应用
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 29;10(1):58. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010058.
6
Adapting Efficiency Analysis in Health Systems: A Scoping Review of Data Envelopment Analysis Applications During the COVID-19 Pandemic.卫生系统中的适应性效率分析:对新冠疫情期间数据包络分析应用的范围审查
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Oct 22;12(4):306-316. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12040024. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Emergency Departments and Management of Emergency Conditions: A Narrative Review.数据包络分析在急诊科及急诊情况管理中的应用:一项叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;11(18):2541. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182541.
8
Employing post-DEA cross-evaluation and cluster analysis in a sample of Greek NHS hospitals.采用 DEA 后交叉评价和聚类分析对希腊 NHS 医院样本进行分析。
J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):1001-14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9533-9. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
9
Oncology services efficiency in the age of pandemic: A jackknife and bootstrap sensitivity analysis for robustness check of DEA scores.大流行时代的肿瘤学服务效率:用于数据包络分析(DEA)分数稳健性检验的刀切法和自助法敏感性分析
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Mar;27:100262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2020.100262. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
10
A window-DEA based efficiency evaluation of the public hospital sector in Greece during the 5-year economic crisis.基于窗口数据包络分析的希腊公立医院部门在5年经济危机期间的效率评估。
PLoS One. 2017 May 23;12(5):e0177946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177946. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Approach in inputs & outputs selection of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) efficiency measurement in hospitals: A systematic review.医院数据包络分析(DEA)效率测量的投入和产出选择方法:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 14;19(8):e0293694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293694. eCollection 2024.
2
A Review on the 40 Years of Existence of Data Envelopment Analysis Models: Historic Development and Current Trends.数据包络分析模型40年发展综述:历史沿革与当前趋势
Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2022;29(7):5397-5426. doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09770-3. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
3
COVID-19 and resilience of healthcare systems in ten countries.
COVID-19 与十个国家的医疗体系韧性
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1314-1324. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01750-1. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
4
The overall impact of COVID-19 on healthcare during the pandemic: A multidisciplinary point of view.新冠疫情期间COVID-19对医疗保健的总体影响:多学科视角
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 1;4(4):e386. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.386. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Essential public healthcare services utilization and excess non-COVID-19 mortality in Greece.希腊基本公共医疗服务利用与超额非 COVID-19 死亡率
Public Health. 2021 Sep;198:85-88. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.06.025. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
6
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
7
A new tool for measurement of process-based performance of multispecialty tertiary care hospitals.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2004;17(6):302-12. doi: 10.1108/09526860410557552.
8
A priority assignment model for standards and conditions in a long term care survey.
Socioecon Plann Sci. 1981;15(6):277-89. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(81)90030-6.