• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies.卫生系统中的药品成本管理:可负担性、可及性与可持续性策略综述
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Dec 10;12(4):403-414. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12040031. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
International experience in controlling pharmaceutical expenditure: influencing patients and providers and regulating industry - a systematic review.控制药品支出的国际经验:影响患者和医疗服务提供者以及规范行业——一项系统综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1):52-9. doi: 10.1177/1355819614545675. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
3
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.药品政策:参考定价、其他定价及采购政策的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 16;2014(10):CD005979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005979.pub2.
4
European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure.欧洲控制药品支出的医疗政策。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(2):89-103. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321020-00002.
5
International Experience in the Management of Pharmaceutical Expenditure: A Narrative Literature Review.药品支出管理的国际经验:叙述性文献综述
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2025 Mar 26;86(3):1-19. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0676. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
6
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
7
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.药品政策:参考定价、其他定价及采购政策的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005979.
8
Issues in drug pricing, reimbursement, and access in China with references to other Asia-Pacific region.中国药品定价、报销及可及性问题,并参考其他亚太地区情况。
Value Health. 2008 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00376.x.
9
Generic drug prices and policy in Australia: room for improvement? a comparative analysis with England.澳大利亚的仿制药价格与政策:有改进空间吗?与英国的比较分析。
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Feb;38(1):6-15. doi: 10.1071/AH12009.
10
Financing pharmaceuticals in transition economies.转型经济体中的药品融资。
Croat Med J. 1999 Jun;40(2):244-59.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term effects of the global budget program and periodic price adjustment on antibacterial agents: A nationwide decomposition analysis between 2001 and 2016.长期全球预算方案和定期价格调整对抗菌药物的影响:2001 年至 2016 年的全国分解分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2024 Jul;52(7):834-842. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
A systematic review of policies regulating or removing mark-ups in the pharmaceutical supply and distribution chain.对规范或取消药品供应和分销链中加价的政策进行系统评价。
Health Policy. 2023 Dec;138:104919. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104919. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
The impact of the national volume-based procurement policy on the use of policy-related drugs in Nanjing: an interrupted time-series analysis.国家基于量的采购政策对南京市政策相关药物使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02006-1.
4
Exploring the impact of clawback on pharmaceutical expenditure: A case study of public hospitals in Greece.探讨回扣对药品支出的影响:以希腊公立医院为例的案例研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Sep;38(5):1539-1554. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3679. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
5
Generic Price Regulation and Drug Expenditures: Evidence From Canada.通用价格监管与药品支出:来自加拿大的证据。
Value Health. 2023 Jun;26(6):833-840. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Impact of the national drug price negotiation policy on the utilization, cost, and accessibility of anticancer medicines in China: A controlled interrupted time series study.国家药品价格谈判政策对中国抗癌药物的利用、成本和可及性的影响:一项基于对照的中断时间序列研究。
J Glob Health. 2022 Dec 17;12:11016. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.11016.
7
Budget cap and pay-back model to control spending on medicines: A case study of Bulgaria.预算上限和偿还模型控制药品支出:保加利亚案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;10:1011928. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1011928. eCollection 2022.
8
Evidence on the effectiveness of policies promoting price transparency - A systematic review.关于促进价格透明度政策有效性的证据——系统评价。
Health Policy. 2023 Aug;134:104681. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
9
Exploring the effectiveness of demand-side retail pharmaceutical expenditure reforms : Cross-country evidence from weighted-average least squares estimation.探索需求方零售药品支出改革的效果:加权平均最小二乘法估计的跨国证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Mar;23(1):149-172. doi: 10.1007/s10754-022-09337-6. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
10
Budget Impact Analysis of the Introduction of a Trastuzumab Biosimilar for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in China.引入曲妥珠单抗生物类似药治疗中国 HER2 阳性乳腺癌的预算影响分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Nov;42(11):937-947. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01197-9. Epub 2022 Sep 17.

卫生系统中的药品成本管理:可负担性、可及性与可持续性策略综述

Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies.

作者信息

Ntais Christos, Talias Michael A, Fanourgiakis John, Kontodimopoulos Nikolaos

机构信息

Healthcare Management Program, School of Economics & Management, Open University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2220, Cyprus;

Department of Management Science and Technology, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 72100 Agios Nikolaos, Greece;

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Dec 10;12(4):403-414. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12040031. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.3390/jmahp12040031
PMID:39735247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11677551/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper reviews cost containment policies to control pharmaceutical expenditure either by regulating the pharmaceutical industry or targeting the demand side.

METHODS

The method used was the narrative literature review of studies which assessed the effect of pharmaceutical cost containment policies.

RESULTS

Governments worldwide have implemented a great variety of policy measures to manage pharmaceutical expenditure while ensuring fair access to essential medicines. Cost-sharing schemes, value-based pricing, reimbursement, reference pricing, payback mechanisms and the substitution of original drugs with generics and biosimilars are pivotal in these efforts, albeit with differing effectiveness across healthcare systems. Overall, it appears that any gains may be outweighed by the unfavorable effects of policies impacting patients. Although interventions have been created to improve physicians' prescribing practice, they often achieve very minor benefits and at considerable cost. Policy measures pertaining to the regulation of the supply side must be supported by thorough evaluation in order to ascertain costs and effects and guarantee that unintended consequences are minimized.

CONCLUSIONS

Policymakers frequently enact numerous laws and regulations to control pharmaceutical expenditure, even if there is limited evidence that they are cost-effective. The most crucial component of any policy's success, regardless of the one selected, is its evaluation. Further research is needed to develop context-specific guidance that balances cost containment, equity and sustainability.

摘要

背景

本文回顾了通过规范制药行业或针对需求方来控制药品支出的成本控制政策。

方法

所采用的方法是对评估药品成本控制政策效果的研究进行叙述性文献综述。

结果

世界各国政府已实施了各种各样的政策措施来管理药品支出,同时确保基本药物的公平可及性。成本分摊计划、基于价值的定价、报销、参考定价、回报机制以及用仿制药和生物类似药替代原研药在这些努力中至关重要,尽管在不同的医疗体系中效果各异。总体而言,政策对患者的不利影响似乎可能超过任何收益。尽管已采取干预措施来改善医生的处方行为,但这些措施往往收效甚微且成本高昂。与供应方监管相关的政策措施必须辅以全面评估,以确定成本和效果,并确保将意外后果降至最低。

结论

政策制定者经常制定众多法律法规来控制药品支出,即便证据有限表明这些措施具有成本效益。无论选择何种政策,其成功的最关键因素都是评估。需要进一步开展研究,以制定兼顾成本控制、公平性和可持续性的因地制宜的指导原则。