• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中孕产间隔期保健服务提供的障碍:临床医生、工作人员及患者的观点

Barriers to Interconception Care Delivery in Primary Care: Clinician, Staff, and Patient Perspectives.

作者信息

Somerville Caitlin, Shireman Hannah, Geppert Amanda, McHugh Ashley, White VanGompel Emily, Holl Jane L, Stulberg Debra B

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Dec 13;5(1):1032-1039. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0110. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0110
PMID:39735382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11671313/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Many reproductive age women, cared for routinely by primary care providers (PCPs), would benefit from interconception care, yet a minority of primary care visits include interconception care. This study assessed barriers to providing interconception care from the perspective of primary care clinicians, staff, and patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicians ( = 11), staff ( = 14), and patients eligible for interconception care ( = 6) from three primary care clinics in Chicago, Illinois participated in focus groups or interviews. Sessions with clinicians and staff elicited descriptions of their clinic's current care delivery processes; sessions with patients focused on their experiences accessing care following pregnancy. Data were used to produce a process map and to identify barriers and facilitators to providing interconception care. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using Dedoose. Findings on barriers are presented here.

RESULTS

Processes for clinics to identify patients eligible for interconception care are lacking. PCPs do not routinely receive information about their patients' prior pregnancies, and relevant information can be hard to access. While patients describe many care needs between pregnancies, they are unsure of where to turn for help: their PCP, obstetrical clinician, or other sources. Contributing organizational limitations involve clinic structure, appointment availability, resources, and insurance coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple barriers in current primary care systems and processes contribute to poor interconception care delivery. These findings, given the known benefits of interconception care, can inform human-centered design to overcome barriers.

摘要

目的

许多由初级保健提供者(PCP)常规护理的育龄妇女将从孕后护理中受益,但只有少数初级保健就诊包含孕后护理。本研究从初级保健临床医生、工作人员和患者的角度评估了提供孕后护理的障碍。

材料与方法

来自伊利诺伊州芝加哥市三家初级保健诊所的临床医生(n = 11)、工作人员(n = 14)以及符合孕后护理条件的患者(n = 6)参加了焦点小组或访谈。与临床医生和工作人员的会议引出了他们诊所当前护理提供流程的描述;与患者的会议则聚焦于他们怀孕后获得护理的经历。数据用于生成流程图,并识别提供孕后护理的障碍和促进因素。会议进行了录音、转录,并使用Dedoose进行主题分析。此处呈现关于障碍的研究结果。

结果

诊所缺乏识别符合孕后护理条件患者的流程。初级保健提供者通常不会收到关于其患者既往妊娠的信息,且相关信息可能难以获取。虽然患者描述了孕期之间的许多护理需求,但他们不确定向何处寻求帮助:他们的初级保健提供者、产科临床医生或其他来源。相关的组织限制包括诊所结构、预约可用性、资源和保险覆盖范围。

结论

当前初级保健系统和流程中的多重障碍导致孕后护理提供不佳。鉴于孕后护理的已知益处,这些发现可为以人为主的设计提供参考,以克服障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2138/11671313/80eae85a6d40/whr.2024.0110_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2138/11671313/80eae85a6d40/whr.2024.0110_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2138/11671313/80eae85a6d40/whr.2024.0110_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers to Interconception Care Delivery in Primary Care: Clinician, Staff, and Patient Perspectives.基层医疗中孕产间隔期保健服务提供的障碍:临床医生、工作人员及患者的观点
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Dec 13;5(1):1032-1039. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0110. eCollection 2024.
2
Reproductive Interconception Care Among Women Recently Pregnant and Homeless: A Qualitative Analysis.近期怀孕且无家可归的女性的生殖避孕咨询:一项定性分析。
Health Educ Behav. 2024 Apr;51(2):302-310. doi: 10.1177/10901981231204583. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Facilitators and Barriers for Successful Implementation of Interconception Care in Preventive Child Health Care Services in the Netherlands.荷兰预防性儿童保健服务中成功实施受孕间隔期保健的促进因素和障碍
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(Suppl 1):117-124. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2046-5.
4
Australian women's experiences and perceptions of interconception care: a qualitative descriptive study.澳大利亚女性对孕间期保健的经历与看法:一项质性描述性研究
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 30. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202408.
5
Healthcare Clinician and Staff Perspectives on Facilitators and Barriers to Ideal Sexual Health Care to High-Risk Depressed Young Women: A Qualitative Study of Diverse Clinic Systems.医疗保健临床医生和工作人员对为高风险抑郁年轻女性提供理想性健康护理的促进因素和障碍的看法:对不同诊所系统的定性研究
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug;33(4):363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
6
Cluster Randomized Trial of a Pre/Interconception Health Intervention for Mothers in Pediatric Visits.儿科就诊中针对母亲的预/孕前健康干预的整群随机试验。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Jul;20(5):660-669. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Preconception and interconception health status of women who recently gave birth to a live-born infant--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 26 reporting areas, 2004.近期生育活产婴儿的妇女孕前及孕后健康状况——美国妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),26个报告地区,2004年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Dec 14;56(10):1-35.
8
Engaging Payors and Primary Care Physicians Together in Improving Diabetes Prevention.使支付方和初级保健医生共同参与改善糖尿病预防。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07788-8. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
Primary Care Providers' Use of Genetic Services in the Southeast United States: Barriers, Facilitators, and Strategies.美国东南部初级保健提供者对遗传服务的使用:障碍、促进因素和策略。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221134752. doi: 10.1177/21501319221134752.
10
Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review.孕前、孕中和生殖健康筛查工具:系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):458-488. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14123. Epub 2023 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Geography and Rurality on Preconception Health Status in the United States.地理和农村因素对美国孕前健康状况的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Nov 9;20:E101. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230104.
2
How does high socioeconomic status affect maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes? A population-based study among American women.高社会经济地位如何影响孕产妇和新生儿的妊娠结局?一项基于人群的美国女性研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Oct 12;20:100248. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100248. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Developing a multimodal maternal infant perinatal outpatient delivery system: the MOMI PODS program.
开发多模式母婴围产期门诊分娩系统:MOMI PODS项目。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Sep 21;4:1232662. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1232662. eCollection 2023.
4
Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review.孕前、孕中和生殖健康筛查工具:系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):458-488. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14123. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
5
Interconception Care for Mothers at Well Child Visits After Implementation of the IMPLICIT Model.产后访视中实施 IMPLICIT 模式对母婴的衔接护理
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Aug;25(8):1193-1199. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03137-z. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
6
Optimizing interconception care: Rationale for the IMPLICIT model.优化避孕期保健:IMPLICIT 模型的原理。
Semin Perinatol. 2020 Jun;44(4):151247. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151247. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
7
"If You Don't Ask, I'm Not Going to Tell You": Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Inform Pregnancy Intention Screening Processes for Black and Latina Women in Primary Care.“如果你不问,我就不会告诉你”:利用社区参与式研究为初级保健中的黑人和拉丁裔妇女提供怀孕意向筛查过程。
Womens Health Issues. 2020 Jan-Feb;30(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal age in the United States.美国的母婴年龄与妊娠间隔时间短和不良妊娠结局。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;31:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Barriers and facilitators to the provision of preconception care by healthcare providers: A systematic review.医疗服务提供者提供孕前保健的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:113-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Short Interpregnancy Intervals in 2014: Differences by Maternal Demographic Characteristics.2014年的短生育间隔:按孕产妇人口统计学特征划分的差异
NCHS Data Brief. 2016 Apr(240):1-8.