Merrell Lauren A, Kadiyala Manasa L, Gibbons Kester, Ganta Abhishek, Konda Sanjit R, Egol Kenneth A
Division of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY 10003 USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, New York, NY USA.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Nov 27;59(1):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01285-2. eCollection 2025 Jan.
There is scarce data in literature on the demographics, treatment, and outcomes of subtrochanteric femur fracture patients. This study evaluated the effect of age on injury details, perioperative and hospital parameters, and outcomes following subtrochanteric fracture fixation.
An IRB-approved review of a consecutive series of subtrochanteric femoral fractures was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were examined to confirm patients were operatively treated for an AO/OTA Type 32A, B or C subtrochanteric femur fracture, as well as for demographics, injury information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into younger (Y) (< 65 years old) and older (O) (≥ 65 years old) cohorts. Comparative analyses were conducted between cohorts.
Of 205 patients, 161 (78.5%) comprised the O cohort and 44 (21.5%) the Y cohort. The O cohort represented a sicker (higher CCI and ASA), less ambulatory population. Patients in the Y cohort sustained more high-energy injuries ( < 0.001). The most common fracture pattern was type 32A in both cohorts ( = 0.003). Older patients were treated more frequently with a 1-screw nail design ( = 0.005). The Y cohort had a shorter time to surgery ( = 0.002) and were more likely to be discharged home ( < 0.001). There were no differences in post-op complications, readmission or mortality rates, nonunion, fixation failure, or radiographic time to healing between cohorts.
Younger patients present with different subtrochanteric fracture patterns and discharge profiles than older patients and are treated with different implants. However, despite these differences, younger and older patients have similar radiographic and clinical outcomes.
III.
关于转子下股骨骨折患者的人口统计学、治疗方法及治疗结果,文献中的数据很少。本研究评估了年龄对转子下骨折固定术后损伤细节、围手术期及住院参数以及治疗结果的影响。
对一系列连续的转子下股骨骨折进行了一项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的回顾性研究。检查患者病历和X光片,以确认患者接受了AO/OTA 32A、B或C型转子下股骨骨折的手术治疗,并收集人口统计学信息、损伤信息、围手术期细节、影像学参数、医院质量指标及治疗结果。患者被分为较年轻组(Y组)(<65岁)和较年长组(O组)(≥65岁)。对两组进行了比较分析。
205例患者中,161例(78.5%)为O组,44例(21.5%)为Y组。O组患者病情更严重(CCI和ASA评分更高),活动能力更差。Y组患者遭受的高能损伤更多(P<0.001)。两组中最常见的骨折类型均为32A型(P=0.003)。老年患者更常采用单螺钉髓内钉设计进行治疗(P=0.005)。Y组患者手术时间更短(P=0.002),且更有可能出院回家(P<0.001)。两组在术后并发症、再入院率或死亡率、骨不连、内固定失败或影像学愈合时间方面无差异。
与老年患者相比,年轻患者的转子下骨折类型和出院情况不同,且使用不同的植入物进行治疗。然而,尽管存在这些差异,年轻患者和老年患者的影像学和临床结果相似。
III级。