Strøm Julie Jepsen, Andersen Camilla Aakjær, Jensen Martin Bach, Thomsen Janus Laust, Laursen Christian B, Skaarup Søren Helbo, Schultz Hans Henrik Lawaetz, Hansen Malene Plejdrup
Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Jun;43(2):359-369. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2447083. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
To evaluate general practitioners' (GPs') ability to perform focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) following a training program and assess FLUS feasibility in general practice. Also, to describe FLUS findings and evaluate GPs' ability to interpret these in adults with acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) when pneumonia is suspected and assess GPs' perception of FLUS impact.
Nine GPs, using point-of-care ultrasound, completed a FLUS training program. Adults (≥ 18 years) with acute cough (< 28 days) and at least one other symptom of acute LRTI, where the GP suspected pneumonia, were subsequently included. All patients received FLUS. The GPs reported FLUS findings, feasibility, and perception of FLUS impact. Recorded FLUS videos from all patients were reviewed by two specialists (Specialist Reference). The specialists assessed FLUS image quality. Agreements between the GPs and the Specialist Reference on FLUS findings were used to evaluate GPs' ability to interpret FLUS.
Of 91 patients included, FLUS image quality was acceptable or higher in 84 patients (92.4%). FLUS proved feasible with only two scans not completed. The GPs reported FLUS pathological findings in 51.7% of patients in 78% agreement with the Specialist Reference and Cohen's kappa 0.56. Focal B-lines represented the most frequent pathological findings. The GPs perceived that FLUS impacted change in tentative diagnosis and/or plans for treatment and/or visitation in 29 (32.0%) of patients.
After the training, the GPs performed FLUS well. Interpretation of FLUS pathology presence was of moderate agreement. The GPs perceived that FLUS had impact on patient management.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04711031.
评估全科医生(GPs)在参加培训项目后进行聚焦肺超声(FLUS)的能力,并评估FLUS在全科医疗中的可行性。此外,描述FLUS的检查结果,并评估全科医生在怀疑患有肺炎的急性下呼吸道感染(LRTI)成人患者中解读这些结果的能力,以及评估全科医生对FLUS影响的看法。
9名全科医生使用床旁超声完成了FLUS培训项目。随后纳入了年龄≥18岁、有急性咳嗽(<28天)且至少有一项其他急性LRTI症状、全科医生怀疑患有肺炎的成人患者。所有患者均接受了FLUS检查。全科医生报告了FLUS检查结果、可行性以及对FLUS影响的看法。两名专家(专家参考组)对所有患者记录的FLUS视频进行了回顾。专家们评估了FLUS图像质量。全科医生与专家参考组在FLUS检查结果上的一致性用于评估全科医生解读FLUS的能力。
在纳入的91名患者中,84名患者(92.4%)的FLUS图像质量可接受或更高。仅2例扫描未完成,证明FLUS是可行的。全科医生报告了51.7%患者的FLUS病理结果,与专家参考组的一致性为78%,Cohen's kappa为0.56。局灶性B线是最常见的病理结果。全科医生认为FLUS对29例(32.0%)患者的初步诊断和/或治疗计划和/或就诊安排产生了影响。
培训后,全科医生FLUS操作良好。对FLUS病理表现的解读一致性中等。全科医生认为FLUS对患者管理有影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04711031。