Zhang Zhengyi, Fang Hua
Department of Chemistry and Material Science, College of Science, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People's Republic of China.
Department of Chemistry and Material Science, College of Science, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People's Republic of China.
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2025 Apr 5;330:125616. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2024.125616. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
For the typical ESIPT process, the proton transfer process is often completed via the intramolecular hydrogen bond (IHB) with oxygen or nitrogen as proton donor or proton acceptor. In recent years, the ESIPT process for sulfur-containing hydrogen bonds has received more and more attention, but it has been rarely reported. We systematically studied the ESIPT processes and photophysical properties of 2-(benzothiophene-2-yl)-3-hydroxy-4H-chromen-4-one (BTOH), 2-(benzothiophene-2-yl)-3-mercapto-4H-chromen-4-one (BTSH) and 2-(benzothiophen-2-yl)-3-hydroxy-4H-chromene-4-thione (BTS) at the HISSbPBE/6-31+G(d,p) and TD-HISSbPBE/6-31+G(d,p) computational level. The IHBs were investigated by analyzing structural parameters, infrared (IR) spectra and electron densities. All the results showed that the IHBs become stronger in the excited state. Among these three molecules, the ESIPT energy barrier of BTSH is the lowest, while that of BTS is the highest. By calculating the natural population analysis (NPA) charge, we found that SH group as a proton donor is easier to provide protons than OH group, and the S group as a proton acceptor is more difficult to obtain protons than O group. The simulated electronic spectra showed that the absorption and fluorescence wavelengths of BTSH and BTS have more or less red-shift compared with BTOH.
对于典型的激发态质子转移(ESIPT)过程,质子转移过程通常通过以氧或氮作为质子供体或质子受体的分子内氢键(IHB)来完成。近年来,含硫氢键的ESIPT过程受到了越来越多的关注,但鲜有报道。我们在HISSbPBE/6-31+G(d,p)和TD-HISSbPBE/6-31+G(d,p)计算水平上系统地研究了2-(苯并噻吩-2-基)-3-羟基-4H-色烯-4-酮(BTOH)、2-(苯并噻吩-2-基)-3-巯基-4H-色烯-4-酮(BTSH)和2-(苯并噻吩-2-基)-3-羟基-4H-色烯-4-硫酮(BTS)的ESIPT过程和光物理性质。通过分析结构参数、红外(IR)光谱和电子密度对分子内氢键进行了研究。所有结果表明,分子内氢键在激发态下变得更强。在这三个分子中,BTSH的ESIPT能垒最低,而BTS的能垒最高。通过计算自然布居分析(NPA)电荷,我们发现作为质子供体的SH基团比OH基团更容易提供质子,而作为质子受体的S基团比O基团更难获得质子。模拟电子光谱表明,与BTOH相比,BTSH和BTS的吸收和荧光波长或多或少发生了红移。