Gao Yuling, Zhao Yanrui, Liu Yang, Lei Shan, Wang Hanzhou, Lizhu Yuerong, Lu Tianchao, Cheng Zhexian, Wang Dong, Zhao Binzhi, Li Ziyi, Zhou Junlin
Orthopedics Department, Affiliated Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Bejing, China.
Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongtinan Road 8#, Beijing, 100020, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 30;25(1):1085. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08215-1.
The objective of this study was to investigate intra-articular distal radius fractures, aiming to provide a comprehensive analysis of fracture patterns and discuss the corresponding treatment strategies for each pattern.
294 cases of intra-articular distal radius fractures lines were collected and clustered thorough K-means and hierarchical clustering algorithm. The demographic data of patients and the clinical treatment outcomes were recorded. For functional evaluation, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, range of motion (ROM) of the wrist joint and the percentage of the grip strength relative to the healthy wrist at 12 months follow-up were evaluated and recorded; For radiographic parameters of volar tilt (VT), radial inclination (RI), and ulnar variance (UV) were obtained; The occurrence of complications was carefully assessed and documented.
Totally 294 patients were included and divided into the volar side affected group and the dorsal side affected groups. And each group was further categorized into three types: type I, with two parts fractures with either one volar/dorsal side intact; type II, with three parts fractures with volar/dorsal side simply affected; and type III, with four parts fractures with volar/dorsal side communited affected. The volar plate fixation was performed as the standard treatment, while the combined plate fixation was used for comminuted dorsal bone defects of the metaphysis and impaction. There were no differences in the postoperative radiograph parameters, functional outcomes and incidences of complications for each type of volar side group and dorsal side group except that the 3.2 type DRFs showed less range of flexion (75.56±7.48)° and extension (61.65±9.9)° than other dorsal types.
A new intra-articular distal radius fractures classification was proposed based on the affection condition of volar or dorsal side. The volar plate fixation is an effective treatment for the intra-articular distal radius fractures, while combined plate fixation can be considered as an alternative treatment for dorsal side comminuted fractures.
III a.
本研究旨在调查桡骨远端关节内骨折,旨在对骨折类型进行全面分析,并讨论每种类型的相应治疗策略。
收集294例桡骨远端关节内骨折线病例,并通过K均值和层次聚类算法进行聚类。记录患者的人口统计学数据和临床治疗结果。对于功能评估,在12个月随访时评估并记录手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾(DASH)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、腕关节活动范围(ROM)以及握力相对于健侧手腕的百分比;获取掌倾角(VT)、桡骨倾斜度(RI)和尺骨变异(UV)的影像学参数;仔细评估并记录并发症的发生情况。
共纳入294例患者,分为掌侧受累组和背侧受累组。每组进一步分为三种类型:I型,两部分骨折,掌侧或背侧一侧完整;II型,三部分骨折,掌侧或背侧简单受累;III型,四部分骨折,掌侧和背侧均粉碎性受累。以掌侧钢板固定作为标准治疗方法,而对于干骺端粉碎性背侧骨缺损和嵌插则采用联合钢板固定。除3.2型桡骨远端骨折的屈曲范围(75.56±7.48)°和伸展范围(61.65±9.9)°小于其他背侧类型外,掌侧组和背侧组各类型的术后影像学参数、功能结果和并发症发生率无差异。
基于掌侧或背侧的受累情况提出了一种新的桡骨远端关节内骨折分类方法。掌侧钢板固定是治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的有效方法,而联合钢板固定可作为背侧粉碎性骨折的替代治疗方法。
III a。