• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吲哚菁绿-透明质酸混合物(LuminoMark™)用于靶向乳腺癌患者可疑腋窝淋巴结的可行性。

Feasibility of an indocyanine green-hyaluronic acid mixture (LuminoMark™) for targeting suspicious axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer.

作者信息

Lee Jeeyeon, Kang Byeongju, Jung Jin Hyang, Kim Hye Jung, Kim Won Hwa, Yang Jung Dug, Lee Joon Seok, Chae Yee Soo, Lee Soo Jung, Lee In Hee, Park Ji-Young, Park Nora Jee-Young, Park Ho Yong

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1588. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13175-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13175-9
PMID:39736609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11687093/
Abstract

PURPOSE

During breast cancer surgery, the use of dyes such as indigo carmine, methylene blue, or indocyanine green (ICG) for targeting axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) under ultrasound guidance can result in rapid diffusion, complicated tissue differentiation, and disruption of staining. LuminoMark™, a novel ICG-hyaluronic acid mixture, can provide real-time visualization and minimize dye spread, thereby ensuring a clear surgical field. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of LuminoMark™ for targeting ALNs in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 13 patients with breast cancer (mean age 56.5 years; 92.3% female) and suspicious ALNs underwent targeted axillary surgery (TAS) with activated charcoal and LuminoMark™ injected into the LNs in the surgical field. The clinicopathological variables of the patients and diagnostic performance were assessed. The LNs injected with LuminoMark™ were examined for consistency with sentinel LNs (SLNs) and non-SLNs, as well as with charcoal-tattooed LNs.

RESULTS

The identification of SLNs took approximately 15.6 min from the start of skin incision, and it required 25.6 and 17.7 min, for charcoal-tattooed and LuminoMark-illuminated LNs, respectively. The identification rate was 92.3% with charcoal and 100% with LuminoMark™. The concordance rate between LuminoMark™ illumination and SLNs was higher than that between charcoal tattooing and SLNs. The concordance rate between the two methods was 76.9% (n = 10). Three months after surgery, the charcoal tattoo remained visible on the skin; however, LuminoMark™ was not visible.

CONCLUSION

Although both methods demonstrated high detection rates, the rate was higher using LuminoMark™. As LuminoMark™ was administered directly into LNs, this improved the accuracy of identifying LNs.

摘要

目的

在乳腺癌手术中,使用靛胭脂、亚甲蓝或吲哚菁绿(ICG)等染料在超声引导下靶向腋窝淋巴结(ALN)会导致染料快速扩散、组织分化复杂以及染色破坏。新型ICG-透明质酸混合物LuminoMark™可提供实时可视化并最大程度减少染料扩散,从而确保手术视野清晰。我们研究的目的是评估LuminoMark™在乳腺癌患者中靶向ALN的疗效。

方法

共有13例乳腺癌患者(平均年龄56.5岁;92.3%为女性)及可疑ALN接受了靶向腋窝手术(TAS),术中将活性炭和LuminoMark™注入手术野中的淋巴结。评估患者的临床病理变量和诊断性能。检查注入LuminoMark™的淋巴结与前哨淋巴结(SLN)、非SLN以及炭标记淋巴结的一致性。

结果

从皮肤切口开始,识别SLN大约需要15.6分钟,炭标记和LuminoMark™照亮的淋巴结分别需要25.6分钟和17.7分钟。活性炭识别率为92.3%,LuminoMark™为100%。LuminoMark™照亮与SLN之间的一致性率高于炭标记与SLN之间的一致性率。两种方法之间的一致性率为76.9%(n = 10)。术后三个月,皮肤上仍可见炭标记;然而,LuminoMark™不可见。

结论

虽然两种方法均显示出高检出率,但使用LuminoMark™时检出率更高。由于LuminoMark™是直接注入淋巴结的,这提高了识别淋巴结的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/f8027a45e9e5/12885_2024_13175_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/1c67e06666de/12885_2024_13175_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/209e940338fa/12885_2024_13175_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/094888bba9fd/12885_2024_13175_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/f8027a45e9e5/12885_2024_13175_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/1c67e06666de/12885_2024_13175_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/209e940338fa/12885_2024_13175_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/094888bba9fd/12885_2024_13175_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b6/11687093/f8027a45e9e5/12885_2024_13175_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of an indocyanine green-hyaluronic acid mixture (LuminoMark™) for targeting suspicious axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer.吲哚菁绿-透明质酸混合物(LuminoMark™)用于靶向乳腺癌患者可疑腋窝淋巴结的可行性。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1588. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13175-9.
2
Comparison of the indocyanine green dye method versus the combined method of indigo carmine blue dye with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast conservative therapy for stage ≤IIA breast cancer.吲哚菁绿染料法与靛胭脂蓝染料联合吲哚菁绿荧光成像法在≤IIA期乳腺癌保乳治疗中前哨淋巴结活检的比较
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Sep 18;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0646-5.
3
Axillary lymph node recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy performed using a combination of indocyanine green fluorescence and the blue dye method in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌采用吲哚菁绿荧光与蓝色染料法联合进行前哨淋巴结活检后的腋窝淋巴结复发
Breast Cancer. 2016 Mar;23(2):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s12282-014-0573-8. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by indocyanine green, blue dye, and their combination in breast cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.对比吲哚菁绿、蓝染料及二者联合引导下的前哨淋巴结活检在乳腺癌患者中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov 2;15(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1264-7.
5
Ultrasound-Guided Restaging and Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Guidance of Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: Experience with Activated Charcoal.超声引导新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结的再分期和定位在乳腺癌患者腋窝手术中的指导作用:活性炭的经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb;25(2):494-500. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6250-3. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Does ultrasound evaluation of the axilla increase the rate of axillary lymph node dissection in early stage clinically node negative breast cancer patients?超声评估腋窝是否会增加早期临床淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫的比例?
BMC Surg. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01530-1.
7
Feasibility of Charcoal Tattooing of Cytology-Proven Metastatic Axillary Lymph Node at Diagnosis and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients.在新辅助化疗后的乳腺癌患者中,细胞学证实的转移性腋窝淋巴结和前哨淋巴结活检时进行炭墨纹身的可行性。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;50(3):801-812. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.210. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
8
Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Non-palpable and Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes with Subsequent Removal after Tattooing: False-Negative Results and Concordance with Sentinel Lymph Nodes.超声引导下对不可触及的可疑腋窝淋巴结进行细针穿刺抽吸并在纹身标记后切除:假阴性结果及与前哨淋巴结的一致性
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Nov;43(11):2576-2581. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
9
Intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients using ultrasonography-guided direct indocyanine green dye-marking by real-time virtual sonography constructed with three-dimensional computed tomography-lymphography.术中应用三维计算机断层淋巴管成像实时虚拟超声造影引导下超声直接吲哚菁绿染料标记检测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结
Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):933-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Ultrasound guided tattooing of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients prior to neoadjuvant therapy, and identification of tattooed nodes at the time of surgery.在新辅助治疗前对乳腺癌患者的腋窝淋巴结进行超声引导下纹身,并在手术时识别纹身的淋巴结。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;46(6):1041-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.501. Epub 2019 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of a clip prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer with microcalcifications may not always be required.对于伴有微钙化的乳腺癌,在新辅助化疗前不一定总是需要使用夹子。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Feb;209(3):585-593. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07517-1. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
Paramagnetic Localization-A Viable Option for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions.顺磁定位——不可触及乳腺病变的可行选择
JAMA Surg. 2024 Mar 1;159(3):247. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6521.
3
Magnetic Seed vs Guidewire Breast Cancer Localization With Magnetic Lymph Node Detection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
磁性种子与导丝乳腺癌定位联合磁性淋巴结检测:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Mar 1;159(3):239-246. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6520.
4
Efficacy of Targeted Axillary Dissection With Radar Reflector Localization Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗前使用雷达反射器定位进行靶向腋窝清扫的疗效
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.061. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
Characteristics of Breast Charcoal Granuloma: A Delayed Complication Following Tattoo Localization.乳腺炭粒肉芽肿的特征:纹身定位后的迟发性并发症
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 29;13(17):2800. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172800.
6
Understanding breast cancer complexity to improve patient outcomes: The St Gallen International Consensus Conference for the Primary Therapy of Individuals with Early Breast Cancer 2023.了解乳腺癌的复杂性以改善患者结局:2023 年圣加仑国际乳腺癌早期个体化治疗共识会议。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov;34(11):970-986. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.017. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
7
The efficacy and safety of an indocyanine green-hyaluronic acid mixture (LuminoMark™) for localization in patients with non-palpable breast lesions: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel phase 3 clinical trial.吲哚菁绿-透明质酸混合物(LuminoMark™)用于不可触及乳腺病变患者定位的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、平行3期临床试验。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 24;13:1039670. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1039670. eCollection 2023.
8
Localization Techniques for Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: Current Status, Knowledge Gaps, and Rationale for the MELODY Study (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET, NCT 05559411).不可触及乳腺病变的定位技术:现状、知识空白及MELODY研究(EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET,NCT 05559411)的理论依据
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 12;15(4):1173. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041173.
9
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022.2022 年癌症治疗和生存统计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Sep;72(5):409-436. doi: 10.3322/caac.21731. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
10
Magnetic Seeds: An Alternative to Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions.磁性种子:一种用于不可触及乳腺病变的导丝定位替代方法。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;22(5):e700-e707. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 17.