Weinstein I B, Lee L S, Fisher P B, Mufson A, Yamasaki H
J Supramol Struct. 1979;12(2):195-208. doi: 10.1002/jss.400120206.
The carcinogenic process is usually multifactor in its causation and multistep in its evolution. It is likely that entirely different molecular mechanisms underlie the many steps in this process. In contrast to initiating carcinogens, the action of the tumor-promoting phorbol esters does not appear to involve covalent binding to cellular DNA and they are not mutagenic. Recent studies in cell culture have revealed two interesting biologic effects of the phorbol esters and related macrocyclic plant diterpenes. The first is that at nanomolar concentrations they induce several changes that resemble those seen in cells transformed by chemical carcinogens or tumor viruses. These include altered morphology and increased saturation density, altered cell surface fucose-glycopeptides, decrease in the LETS protein, increased transport of deoxyglucose, and increased levels of plasminogen activator and ornithine decarboxylase. In transformed cells exposed to phorbol esters the expression of these features is further accentuated. Phorbol esters do not induce normal cells to grow in agar but they do enhance the growth in agar of certain transformed cells. The second effect of the phorbol esters is inhibition of terminal differentiation. This effect extends to a variety of programs of differentiation and is reversible when the agent is removed. With certain cell culture systems induction of differentiation, rather than inhibition, is observed. Both the transformation mimetic and the differentiation effects are exerted by plant diterpenes that have tumor-promoting activity but not by congeners that lack such activity. The primary target of phorbol esters appears to be the cell membrane. Early membrane-related effects include enhanced uptake of 2-deoxyglucose and other nutrients, altered cell adhesion, induction of arachidonic acid release and prostaglandin synthesis, inhibition of the binding of epidermal growth factor to cell surface receptors, altered lipid metabolism, and modifications in the activities of other cell surface receptors. A model of "two stage" carcinogenesis encompassing the known molecular and cellular effects of initiating carcinogens and tumor promoters is presented. According to this model, initiating carcinogens induce stable alterations in the cellular genome but these are not manifested until tumor promoters modulate programs of gene expression and induce the clonal outgrowth of the initiated cell.
致癌过程通常在病因上是多因素的,在演变过程中是多步骤的。在这个过程的许多步骤中,可能存在完全不同的分子机制。与引发致癌物不同,促肿瘤佛波酯的作用似乎不涉及与细胞DNA的共价结合,并且它们没有致突变性。最近在细胞培养中的研究揭示了佛波酯和相关大环植物二萜的两种有趣的生物学效应。第一种是在纳摩尔浓度下,它们会诱导几种变化,类似于在化学致癌物或肿瘤病毒转化的细胞中看到的变化。这些变化包括形态改变和饱和密度增加、细胞表面岩藻糖糖肽改变、LETS蛋白减少、脱氧葡萄糖转运增加、纤溶酶原激活剂和鸟氨酸脱羧酶水平升高。在暴露于佛波酯的转化细胞中,这些特征的表达会进一步增强。佛波酯不会诱导正常细胞在琼脂中生长,但它们会增强某些转化细胞在琼脂中的生长。佛波酯的第二种效应是抑制终末分化。这种效应扩展到多种分化程序,并且当去除该试剂时是可逆的。在某些细胞培养系统中,观察到的是诱导分化而不是抑制分化。具有促肿瘤活性的植物二萜会产生模拟转化和分化的效应,而缺乏这种活性的同类物则不会。佛波酯的主要靶标似乎是细胞膜。早期与膜相关的效应包括增强2-脱氧葡萄糖和其他营养物质的摄取、改变细胞粘附、诱导花生四烯酸释放和前列腺素合成、抑制表皮生长因子与细胞表面受体的结合、改变脂质代谢以及其他细胞表面受体活性的改变。本文提出了一个“两阶段”致癌模型,该模型涵盖了引发致癌物和肿瘤促进剂已知的分子和细胞效应。根据这个模型,引发致癌物会诱导细胞基因组发生稳定变化,但这些变化直到肿瘤促进剂调节基因表达程序并诱导起始细胞的克隆扩增才会显现出来。