Suppr超能文献

实体恶性肿瘤患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗时大麻使用与临床结局之间的关联。

Association between cannabis use and clinical outcomes in patients with solid malignancies receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

作者信息

Hadid Tarik, Biedny Adam, Mamdani Hirva, Azmi Asfar, Kim Seongho, Jang Hyejeong, Uprety Dipesh, Al Hallak Mohammed Najeeb, Sukari Ammar

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 E Canfield Street, Detroit, MI 48201-1928, USA.

Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2024 Dec 25;12:25151355241309095. doi: 10.1177/25151355241309095. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cannabis (CAN) use has risen significantly over the last few decades. CAN has potent immunosuppressive properties, which could antagonize the effect of immunotherapy (IO). The impact of CAN use on clinical cancer outcomes remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we evaluated the clinical effect of CAN use on clinical outcomes among patients with solid malignancies receiving IO.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients with solid malignancies receiving IO between August 2014 and August 2018.

METHODS

Patients were stratified based on CAN use to CAN users and CAN non-users. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to compare the outcomes between the two groups, adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

The records of 106 patients were reviewed, 28 (26%) of whom were CAN users and 78 (74%) were CAN non-users. One patient was excluded. Most CAN users consumed dronabinol (82%). The median follow-up for OS and PFS was 29.2 months. Median OS in the CAN users was 6.7 months compared to 17.3 months in the CAN non-users (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.06-2.97;  = 0.029). The median PFS was 4.8 months in the CAN users compared to 9.7 months in the CAN non-users (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.09-2.79;  = 0.021). DCR was 11% among CAN users and 38% among CAN non-users (OR, 0.23; 95% CI; 0.06-0.68;  = 0.007). An exploratory racial disparity analysis showed that this negative impact of CAN was primarily seen in White patients.

CONCLUSION

In this single institutional experience, CAN use was associated with worse OS, PFS, and DCR among cancer patients receiving IO. Prospective trials are needed to further study this potential antagonistic interaction between CAN and IO and explore the racial disparities related to CAN exposure.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年里,大麻(CAN)的使用显著增加。大麻具有强大的免疫抑制特性,这可能会对抗免疫疗法(IO)的效果。大麻使用对临床癌症结局的影响仍不明确。

目的

在本研究中,我们评估了大麻使用对接受IO治疗的实体恶性肿瘤患者临床结局的临床影响。

设计

这是一项对2014年8月至2018年8月期间所有接受IO治疗的实体恶性肿瘤患者的回顾性队列研究。

方法

根据大麻使用情况将患者分为大麻使用者和非使用者。主要结局是总生存期(OS),次要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病控制率(DCR)。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归及Cox回归分析,以比较两组之间的结局,并对协变量进行调整。

结果

回顾了106例患者的记录,其中28例(26%)为大麻使用者,78例(74%)为非使用者。排除1例患者。大多数大麻使用者服用屈大麻酚(82%)。OS和PFS的中位随访时间为29.2个月。大麻使用者的中位OS为6.7个月,而非使用者为17.3个月(HR,1.78;95%CI,1.06 - 2.97;P = 0.029)。大麻使用者的中位PFS为4.8个月,而非使用者为9.7个月(HR,1.74;95%CI,1.09 - 2.79;P = 0.021)。大麻使用者中的DCR为11%,非使用者中为38%(OR,0.23;95%CI;0.06 - 0.68;P = 0.007)。一项探索性种族差异分析表明,大麻的这种负面影响主要见于白人患者。

结论

在这一单一机构的经验中,大麻使用与接受IO治疗的癌症患者较差 的OS、PFS和DCR相关。需要进行前瞻性试验,以进一步研究大麻与IO之间这种潜在的拮抗相互作用,并探索与大麻暴露相关的种族差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcab/11683815/7bfda41b5dbb/10.1177_25151355241309095-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验