van der Veen Daan R, Gerkema Menno P
Chronobiology Section, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Physiol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1504879. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1504879. eCollection 2024.
Rapid, ultradian biological rhythms are only partly comparable to circadian (24-h) rhythms. Often, the ensuing expectations from this comparison are that 1) ultradian rhythms should be driven by discrete oscillators, 2) they are biochemically buffered, and 3) they must be functionally linked to extrinsic events and cycles. These three expectations are not always met, but perhaps there is an adaptive benefit to ultradian rhythms not meeting these expectations, which sets them functionally apart from circadian rhythms. In view of the extensive descriptions of the manifold types of ultradian rhythms across all biological levels (e.g., see papers in this research topic), it seems important to ask whether we should actively create a new set of definitions and expectations. To make a start, we here lay out some important questions we need to ask about ultradian rhythms. We then illustrate how these questions highlight one key area of exploration: the linked expression of ultradian rhythms in metabolism and behaviour and the role this plays in addressing a negative energy balance.
快速的超日生物节律仅在部分程度上可与昼夜(24小时)节律相比较。通常,基于这种比较产生的预期是:1)超日节律应由离散的振荡器驱动;2)它们具有生化缓冲作用;3)它们必须在功能上与外部事件和周期相联系。这三点预期并非总能实现,但或许超日节律不符合这些预期具有适应性益处,这使得它们在功能上有别于昼夜节律。鉴于在所有生物层面上对多种类型超日节律的广泛描述(例如,见本研究专题中的论文),探讨我们是否应积极构建一套新的定义和预期显得很重要。首先,我们在此列出一些关于超日节律需要提出的重要问题。然后我们将说明这些问题如何突出了一个关键的探索领域:超日节律在新陈代谢和行为中的关联表达以及这在应对负能量平衡中所起的作用。