Terry J Christopher D
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jan;28(1):e70047. doi: 10.1111/ele.70047.
Interactions between species pose considerable challenges for forecasting the response of ecological communities to global changes. Coexistence theory could address this challenge by defining the conditions species can or cannot persist alongside competitors. However, although coexistence theory is increasingly deployed for projections, these frameworks have rarely been subjected to critical multigenerational validation tests. Here, using a highly replicated mesocosm experiment, I directly test if the modern coexistence theory approach can predict time-to-extirpation in the face of rising temperatures within the context of competition from a heat-tolerant species. Competition hastened expiration and the modelled point of coexistence breakdown overlapped with mean observations under both steady temperature increases and with additional environmental stochasticity. That said, although the theory identified the interactive effect between the stressors, predictive precision was low even in this simplified system. Nonetheless, these results support the careful use of coexistence modelling for forecasts and understanding drivers of change.
物种间的相互作用给预测生态群落对全球变化的响应带来了巨大挑战。共存理论可以通过定义物种在竞争者共存时能够或无法持续存在的条件来应对这一挑战。然而,尽管共存理论越来越多地用于预测,但这些框架很少经过关键的多代验证测试。在这里,我使用高度重复的中宇宙实验,直接测试现代共存理论方法是否能够在耐热物种竞争的背景下,面对温度升高预测灭绝时间。竞争加速了灭绝,并且在稳定温度升高和额外环境随机性的情况下,共存崩溃的模拟点与平均观测值重叠。也就是说,尽管该理论确定了压力源之间的交互作用,但即使在这个简化系统中,预测精度也很低。尽管如此,这些结果支持谨慎使用共存模型进行预测并理解变化驱动因素。