Dehghanpour Ailin, Pecoraro Martina, Messina Emanuele, Laschena Ludovica, Borrelli Antonella, Novelli Simone, Santini Daniele, Simone Giuseppe, Girometti Rossano, Panebianco Valeria
Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Dec 31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11327-w.
The primary aim was to determine the performance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy VI-RADS (nacVI-RADS) in predicting response to systemic therapy in patients with MIBC and to evaluate its inter-reader agreement.
Prospective study, including patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC). Patients underwent pre- and post-treatment MRI. Radiological response was evaluated by two experienced radiologists using nacVI-RADS scoring system. Reference standard was defined using histopathological findings. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy were calculated to assess nacVI-RADS performance for each reader. Inter-reader agreement was determined with Cohen's k statistics.
Fifty-five patients with non-metastatic MIBC, 46 males (84%) and 9 females (16%) with a median age of 69 (interquartile range (IQR) 66-72 years) were enrolled. Diagnostic performance of nacVI-RADS in detecting complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed a sensitivity of 76.5-85.3% and specificity of 76.2-81%. The area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.99) for detecting any residual tissue, for the more experienced reader. Inter-reader agreement was optimal with a K of 0.85. In the multivariable logistic regression model, the variables showing independent correlation with response prediction to neoadjuvant therapy were nacVI-RADS score (p = 0.01 for the more experienced reader) and tumor regression grade (TRG; p < 0.001).
NacVI-RADS scoring system offers a reliable and reproducible approach, employing a well-structured and easily interpretable method, to assess the response to systemic therapy in patients with MIBC.
Question There is a lack of a standardized approach to distinguish between responders and non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Findings The neoadjuvant chemotherapy VI-RADS (nacVI-RADS) score diagnostic performance for detecting complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed 85.3% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and an AUC of 0.93. Clinical relevance NacVI-RADS score represents a valid predictor of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy, impacting therapeutic decision-making and improving overall patients' management.
主要目的是确定新辅助化疗VI-RADS(nacVI-RADS)在预测肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者对全身治疗反应方面的表现,并评估其阅片者间的一致性。
前瞻性研究,纳入在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)前接受新辅助化疗的非转移性肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者。患者在治疗前和治疗后接受了MRI检查。两名经验丰富的放射科医生使用nacVI-RADS评分系统评估放射学反应。参考标准根据组织病理学结果确定。计算敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和准确性,以评估每位阅片者的nacVI-RADS表现。阅片者间的一致性通过Cohen's k统计量确定。
纳入55例非转移性MIBC患者,其中46例男性(84%),9例女性(16%),中位年龄69岁(四分位间距(IQR)66 - 72岁)。nacVI-RADS在检测对新辅助化疗的完全反应方面的诊断性能显示敏感性为76.5% - 85.3%,特异性为76.2% - 81%。对于经验更丰富的阅片者,检测任何残留组织的曲线下面积为0.93(95%CI:0.86 - 0.99)。阅片者间一致性最佳,K值为0.85。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,与新辅助治疗反应预测显示独立相关性的变量是nacVI-RADS评分(经验更丰富的阅片者p = 0.01)和肿瘤退缩分级(TRG;p < 0.001)。
NacVI-RADS评分系统提供了一种可靠且可重复的方法,采用结构良好且易于解释的方式,来评估MIBC患者对全身治疗的反应。
问题 对于肌层浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗的反应者和无反应者,缺乏标准化的区分方法。发现 新辅助化疗VI-RADS(nacVI-RADS)评分在检测对新辅助化疗的完全反应方面的诊断性能显示敏感性为85.3%,特异性为81%,AUC为0.93。临床意义 NacVI-RADS评分是新辅助全身治疗反应的有效预测指标,影响治疗决策并改善整体患者管理。