Lin Chia-Chia, Ho Tsing-Fen, Lin Chang-Hung, Tsai Nu-Man, Kuo Yu-Hung, Chien Ju-Huei
Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu-Chi Medical Foundation, No. 88 Fong-Shing Road, Taichung City 42743, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 666 Buzih Road, Taichung City 40601, Taiwan.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Jan 9;37(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae119.
In Taiwan, as the population ages, palliative care services (PCS) have expanded significantly to include comprehensive benefit plans for critically ill individuals, supported by reimbursements from the National Health Insurance program. However, incorporating palliative care into the medical management of these patients presents several challenges. We aim to evaluate the effects of palliative care interventions on medical resources in end-of-life scenarios, to promote earlier palliative care access and provide high-quality healthcare services for patients.
A total of 2202 patients were included in this study. Primary diagnosis and referral for PCS were assessed using ICD-10 and HNI code. All study subjects were divided into three groups: patients who did not receive PCS (no-PCS), patients who received PCS before their final hospital admission (PCS-before), and patients who received PCS after their final admission (PCS-after). We evaluated (i) the effects of PCS on eight medical resource utilization outcomes within the 30 days preceding death and (ii) the effects of early intervention on two major diseases.
Initiating PCS before a patient's last hospital admission was associated with less aggressive medical interventions in the 30 days before death, including reduced length of intensive care unit (ICU) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.25], and rates of endotracheal intubation (OR = 0.12), respiratory ventilator support (OR = 0.20), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR = 0.18), and blood transfusion (OR = 0.65). Among patients with cancer and lung diseases, those who received PCS prior to their final hospitalization of over 14 days experienced reduced hospitalization duration (OR = 0.52 and 0.24, respectively). Patients with lung disease also had significantly lower odds of ICU stays (OR = 0.44) and respiratory ventilation (OR = 0.33).
The timing of palliative care intervention critically impacts on duration of hospitalization and ICU stay and the need for intubation procedures or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The findings can help the government and medical providers in developing comprehensive palliative care policies and programs to improve care quality and patient rights.
在台湾,随着人口老龄化,姑息治疗服务(PCS)已大幅扩展,纳入了针对重症患者的综合福利计划,并得到了国民健康保险计划报销的支持。然而,将姑息治疗纳入这些患者的医疗管理面临诸多挑战。我们旨在评估姑息治疗干预措施在临终情况下对医疗资源的影响,以促进更早获得姑息治疗,并为患者提供高质量的医疗服务。
本研究共纳入2202例患者。使用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)和医院护理指标(HNI)代码评估PCS的初步诊断和转诊情况。所有研究对象分为三组:未接受PCS的患者(无PCS组)、在最后一次住院前接受PCS的患者(住院前PCS组)和在最后一次住院后接受PCS的患者(住院后PCS组)。我们评估了(i)PCS对死亡前30天内八项医疗资源利用结果的影响,以及(ii)早期干预对两种主要疾病的影响。
在患者最后一次住院前开始实施PCS与死亡前30天内减少积极的医疗干预相关,包括缩短重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间[比值比(OR) = 0.25],以及降低气管插管率(OR = 0.12)、呼吸呼吸机支持率(OR = 0.20)、心肺复苏率(OR = 0.18)和输血率(OR = 0.65)。在癌症和肺部疾病患者中,那些在最后一次住院超过14天前接受PCS的患者住院时间缩短(分别为OR = 0.52和0.24)。肺部疾病患者入住ICU和接受呼吸通气的几率也显著降低(OR分别为0.44和0.33)。
姑息治疗干预的时机对住院时间和ICU住院时间以及插管程序或心肺复苏的需求有至关重要的影响。这些发现有助于政府和医疗服务提供者制定全面的姑息治疗政策和计划,以提高护理质量和患者权益。