• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 COVID-19 大流行期间在马拉维部署的 3 种数字监测工具的开发、实施、维护及影响的评估:一项改良德尔菲专家共识研究方案

Evaluation of the Development, Implementation, Maintenance, and Impact of 3 Digital Surveillance Tools Deployed in Malawi During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study.

作者信息

Denny Alanna, Ndemera Isaach, Chirwa Kingston, Wu Joseph Tsung Shu, Chirambo Griphin Baxter, Yosefe Simeon, Chilima Ben, Kagoli Matthew, Lee Hsin-Yi, Yu Kwong Leung Joseph, O'Donoghue John

机构信息

Research Department, Luke International, Mzuzu, Malawi.

School of Public Health, Department of Medicine & Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 31;13:e58389. doi: 10.2196/58389.

DOI:10.2196/58389
PMID:39740220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11733520/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of strengthening national monitoring systems to safeguard a globally connected society, especially those in low- and middle-income countries. Africa's rapid adoption of digital technological interventions created a new frontier of digital advancement during crises or pandemics. The use of digital tools for disease surveillance can assist with rapid outbreak identification and response, handling duties such as diagnosis, testing, contact tracing, and risk communication. Malawi was one of the first countries in the region to launch a government-led coordinated effort to harmonize and streamline the necessary COVID-19 digital health implementation through an integrated system architecture.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to seek expert consensus using the Delphi methodology to examine Malawi's COVID-19 digital surveillance response strategy and to assess the digital tools using the World Health Organization mHealth (mobile health) Assessment and Planning for Scale (MAPS) toolkit.

METHODS

This protocol follows the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies. Participants must have first-hand experience on the design, implementation or maintenance with COVID-19 digital surveillance systems. There will be no restrictions on the level of expertise or years of experience. The panel will consist of approximately 40 participants. We will use a modified Delphi process whereby rounds 1 and 2 will be hosted online by Qualtrics and round 3 will encompass a face-to-face workshop held in Malawi. Consensus will be defined as ≥70% of participants strongly disagree, disagree, or somewhat disagree, or strongly agree, agree, or somewhat agree. During round 3, the face-to-face workshop, participants will be asked to complete, the MAPS toolkit assessment on the digital tool on which they are experts. The MAPS toolkit will enable the panel members to assess the digital tools from a sustainable perspective from six distinct, yet complementary axes: (1) groundwork, (2) partnerships, (3) financial health, (4) technology and architecture, (5) operations, and (6) monitoring and evaluation.

RESULTS

The ability of a country to collate, diagnose, monitor, and analyze data forms the cornerstone of an efficient surveillance system, allowing countries to plan and implement appropriate control actions. Malawi was one of the first countries in the African region to launch a government-led coordinated effort to harmonize and streamline the necessary COVID-19 digital health implementation through an integrated system architecture.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate findings from this Delphi study will provide insights into how and why Malawi was successful in deploying digital surveillance systems. In addition, findings should produce recommendations and guidance for the rapid development, implementation, maintenance, and impact of digital surveillance tools during a health crisis.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/58389.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情凸显了加强国家监测系统以保障全球互联社会安全的重要性,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。非洲迅速采用数字技术干预措施,在危机或疫情期间开创了数字发展的新前沿。利用数字工具进行疾病监测有助于快速识别疫情并做出应对,承担诊断、检测、接触者追踪和风险沟通等职责。马拉维是该地区最早发起政府主导的协调努力的国家之一,通过综合系统架构来统一和简化必要的新冠数字健康实施工作。

目的

本研究旨在运用德尔菲法寻求专家共识,以审视马拉维的新冠数字监测应对策略,并使用世界卫生组织移动健康评估与规模规划(MAPS)工具包评估数字工具。

方法

本方案遵循《德尔菲研究实施与报告指南》。参与者必须在新冠数字监测系统的设计、实施或维护方面有第一手经验。对专业水平或工作年限没有限制。专家小组将由约40名参与者组成。我们将采用改良的德尔菲流程,其中第1轮和第2轮将由Qualtrics在线主持,第3轮将包括在马拉维举行的面对面研讨会。共识将定义为≥70%的参与者强烈反对、反对、有点反对,或强烈同意、同意、有点同意。在第3轮面对面研讨会上,将要求参与者完成对其作为专家的数字工具的MAPS工具包评估。MAPS工具包将使专家小组成员能够从六个不同但互补的维度,从可持续性角度评估数字工具:(1)基础工作,(2)伙伴关系,(3)财务状况,(4)技术与架构,(5)运营,以及(6)监测与评估。

结果

一个国家整理、诊断、监测和分析数据的能力构成了高效监测系统的基石,使各国能够规划和实施适当的控制行动。马拉维是非洲地区最早发起政府主导的协调努力的国家之一,通过综合系统架构来统一和简化必要的新冠数字健康实施工作。

结论

我们预计这项德尔菲研究的结果将深入了解马拉维如何以及为何成功部署数字监测系统。此外,研究结果应为健康危机期间数字监测工具的快速开发、实施、维护和影响提供建议和指导。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/58389。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e6/11733520/a5629b4d1138/resprot_v13i1e58389_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e6/11733520/ebe9c5b056c1/resprot_v13i1e58389_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e6/11733520/e8367f3ffdcf/resprot_v13i1e58389_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e6/11733520/a5629b4d1138/resprot_v13i1e58389_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e6/11733520/ebe9c5b056c1/resprot_v13i1e58389_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e6/11733520/e8367f3ffdcf/resprot_v13i1e58389_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e6/11733520/a5629b4d1138/resprot_v13i1e58389_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Development, Implementation, Maintenance, and Impact of 3 Digital Surveillance Tools Deployed in Malawi During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study.对 COVID-19 大流行期间在马拉维部署的 3 种数字监测工具的开发、实施、维护及影响的评估:一项改良德尔菲专家共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 31;13:e58389. doi: 10.2196/58389.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Defining and Risk-Stratifying Immunosuppression (the DESTINIES Study): Protocol for an Electronic Delphi Study.定义和风险分层免疫抑制(DESTINIES 研究):电子德尔菲研究议定书。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 6;13:e56271. doi: 10.2196/56271.
4
Prioritizing post-COVID-19 health research in sub-Saharan Africa: A modified Delphi study for future pandemic.确定撒哈拉以南非洲地区 COVID-19 后健康研究的优先事项:一项针对未来大流行的改良德尔菲研究。
Sci Afr. 2024 Mar;23. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02103. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
6
Expert consensus on implementing patient-reported outcomes in telehealth: findings from an international Delphi study.远程医疗中实施患者报告结局的专家共识:一项国际德尔菲研究的结果
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Apr 9;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00872-7.
7
Lessons Learned From Implementing Digital Health Tools to Address COVID-19 in LMICs.从实施数字健康工具以应对中低收入国家的 COVID-19 中吸取的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;10:859941. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859941. eCollection 2022.
8
Digital Public Health Solutions in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Contact Tracing Solutions Deployed in Japan and Germany.数字公共卫生解决方案应对 COVID-19 大流行:日本和德国部署的接触者追踪解决方案的比较分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 14;25:e44966. doi: 10.2196/44966.
9
Developing a Consensus for Adolescent and Young Adult mHealth HIV Prevention Interventions in the United States: A Delphi Method Study.在美国制定青少年和青年移动健康HIV预防干预措施的共识:一项德尔菲法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 12;6(7):e25982. doi: 10.2196/25982.
10
Digital Contact Tracing Implementation Among Leaders and Health Care Workers in a Pediatric Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Interview Study.新冠疫情期间儿科医院领导和医护人员中数字接触者追踪的实施:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 5;10:e64270. doi: 10.2196/64270.

引用本文的文献

1
Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Mobile Rehabilitation: State of the Science Conference Report-Future Directions for mRehab for People with Disabilities.移动康复康复工程研究中心:科学现状会议报告——残疾人移动康复的未来方向
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;22(4):532. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040532.

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving consensus on psychosocial and physical rehabilitation management for people living with kidney disease.就肾病患者的心理社会和身体康复管理达成共识。
Clin Kidney J. 2023 May 19;16(11):2185-2193. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad116. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Therapeutic Exercise Parameters, Considerations and Recommendations for the Treatment of Non-Specific Low Back Pain: International DELPHI Study.非特异性下腰痛治疗的治疗性运动参数、注意事项及建议:国际德尔菲研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 19;13(10):1510. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101510.
3
The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study.
术前白内障屈光评估诊断设备的当前负担与未来解决方案:一项改良德尔菲研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 24;17:2109-2124. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S412847. eCollection 2023.
4
The use of innovative approaches to strengthen health system resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: case studies from selected Commonwealth countries.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,采用创新方法增强卫生系统的弹性:来自选定英联邦国家的案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 27;11:1115415. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1115415. eCollection 2023.
5
Digital health systems strengthening in Africa for rapid response to COVID-19.非洲加强数字卫生系统以快速应对新冠疫情。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Nov 28;2:987828. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.987828. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessment of COVID-19 pandemic responses in African countries: thematic synthesis of WHO intra-action review reports.评估非洲国家对 COVID-19 大流行的应对措施:对世卫组织内部行动审查报告的主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 2;12(5):e056896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056896.
7
Strengthening global health security by improving disease surveillance in remote rural areas of low-income and middle-income countries.加强全球卫生安全,改善中低收入国家偏远农村地区的疾病监测。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Apr;10(4):e579-e584. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00031-6.
8
COVID-19 and beyond: Use of digital technology for pandemic response in Africa.新冠疫情及未来:非洲利用数字技术应对大流行
Sci Afr. 2021 Nov;14:e01041. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01041. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
10
Two different invitation approaches for consecutive rounds of a Delphi survey led to comparable final outcome.两种不同的德尔菲调查轮次邀请方法得到了可比的最终结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Sep 28.