• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫持续状态患者难治性癫痫持续状态发生的相关因素。

Factors in the development of refractory status epilepticus in status epilepticus patients.

作者信息

Şahin Oruç, Güneş Muzaffer

机构信息

Aksaray University Faculty of Medicine Department of Neurology, Aksaray, Turkiye.

Aksaray University Faculty of Medicine Department of Neurology, Aksaray, Turkiye.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2025 Feb;163:110232. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110232. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110232
PMID:39740256
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Status epilepticus (SE) is a severe neurological condition associated with a poor prognosis. Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is a treatment-resistant form of SE with an even worse prognosis. The exact mechanisms underlying the development of RSE are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors contributing to the development of RSE in SE patients and to identify predictors of RSE occurrence.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with SE and RSE between 2014 and 2024. Demographic information, comorbid conditions, and blood sample data of the patients were recorded for statistical analysis. The statistical analyses used included the Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, ROC curve analysis, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 82 SE patients were included in the study. Of these, 44 were non-RSE patients (control group), and 38 were RSE patients. Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of median age (p = 0.001), blood glucose level (p = 0.023), pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) (p = 0.002), Monocyte/Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) (p = 0.009), Neutrophil/Albumin Ratio (NAR) (p = 0.003), Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII) (p = 0.013), Eosinophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (ELR) (p = 0.016), Eosinophil/Neutrophil Ratio (ENR) (p = 0.006), and Eosinophil/Monocyte Ratio (EMR) (p = 0.002). The multivariate logistic regression model identified the presence of arterial hypertension as the only factor significantly associated with the development of RSE (p < 0.001). In the ROC curve analysis, PIV (AUC = 0.696) and NAR (AUC = 0.689) were found to be predictive factors for RSE.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings obtained in the current study suggest that systemic inflammation and arterial hypertension may be associated with the progression of SE to RSE. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and integrate them into routine clinical practice.

摘要

目的

癫痫持续状态(SE)是一种严重的神经系统疾病,预后较差。难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)是SE的一种治疗抵抗形式,预后更差。RSE发生的确切机制尚未完全明确。本研究旨在探讨SE患者发生RSE的相关因素,并确定RSE发生的预测指标。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了2014年至2024年间诊断为SE和RSE的患者。记录患者的人口统计学信息、合并症情况及血液样本数据用于统计分析。所采用的统计分析方法包括曼-惠特尼U检验、卡方检验、费舍尔精确检验、ROC曲线分析和逻辑回归。

结果

本研究共纳入82例SE患者。其中,44例为非RSE患者(对照组),38例为RSE患者。两组在年龄中位数(p = 0.001)、血糖水平(p = 0.023)、全免疫炎症值(PIV)(p = 0.002)、单核细胞/淋巴细胞比值(MLR)(p = 0.009)、中性粒细胞/白蛋白比值(NAR)(p = 0.003)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)(p = 0.013)、嗜酸性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(ELR)(p = 0.016)、嗜酸性粒细胞/中性粒细胞比值(ENR)(p = 0.006)和嗜酸性粒细胞/单核细胞比值(EMR)(p = 0.002)方面存在显著差异。多因素逻辑回归模型确定动脉高血压的存在是与RSE发生显著相关的唯一因素(p < 0.001)。在ROC曲线分析中,发现PIV(AUC = 0.696)和NAR(AUC = 0.689)是RSE的预测因素。

结论

本研究结果表明,全身炎症和动脉高血压可能与SE进展为RSE有关。需要进一步研究以证实这些发现并将其纳入常规临床实践。

相似文献

1
Factors in the development of refractory status epilepticus in status epilepticus patients.癫痫持续状态患者难治性癫痫持续状态发生的相关因素。
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 Feb;163:110232. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110232. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Uric acid is a useful marker to differentiate between responsive and refractory status epilepticus.尿酸是区分反应性和难治性癫痫持续状态的有用标志物。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;184:105454. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105454. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
Factors affecting mortality of refractory status epilepticus.影响难治性癫痫持续状态患者死亡率的因素。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Feb;141(2):123-131. doi: 10.1111/ane.13173. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Progression to refractory status epilepticus: A machine learning analysis by means of classification and regression tree analysis.
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Dec;161:110005. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110005. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
5
Predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus: A prospective study.癫痫持续状态的预后及难治性预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
A one-year prospective study of refractory status epilepticus in Modena, Italy.意大利摩德纳难治性癫痫持续状态的一年前瞻性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.05.022.
7
Spectrum and Predictors of Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Developing Country.发展中国家难治性癫痫持续状态的特征和预测因素。
Can J Neurol Sci. 2017 Sep;44(5):538-546. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2017.28. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Predictors and prognosis of refractory status epilepticus treated in a neurological intensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中难治性癫痫持续状态的预测因素及预后
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;76(4):534-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.041947.
9
Prognosis and predictors of outcome of refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus in adults treated in neurointensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中接受治疗的成年难治性全面性惊厥性癫痫持续状态的预后及结局预测因素
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;126:7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.038. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
10
Causes and outcomes of new onset status epilepticus and predictors of refractoriness to therapy.新发癫痫持续状态的病因、结局及治疗难治性的预测因素。
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Apr;26:89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.06.032. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of pan-immune-inflammation value in the prognosis of adults with status epilepticus: a retrospective study.泛免疫炎症值对成人癫痫持续状态预后的预测价值:一项回顾性研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jul 16;17:1601816. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1601816. eCollection 2025.