• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多种非侵入性脑刺激治疗老年患者重度抑郁症的比较疗效:一项基于随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析研究

Comparative efficacy of multiple non-invasive brain stimulation to treat major depressive disorder in older patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis study based on randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Yang Yang, Chen Jianglin, Yu Min, Xiong Cheng, Zhang Rong, Jiang Guohui

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College; Institute of Neurological Diseases, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China.

Department of Neurology, Guang' an District People's Hospital, Guang' an, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2025 Feb;344:116340. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116340. Epub 2024 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116340
PMID:39740314
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is prevalent among older patients and is frequently associated with cognitive decline and a reduced quality of life. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques show promise for treating MDD, but their comparative efficacy and safety older populations remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and cognitive effects of various NIBS techniques in treating MDD in older patients.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science core databases from inception to March 2024. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included.

RESULTS

Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to rank the interventions. The SUCRA rankings for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) outcomes indicated that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (89.0 %) had the highest efficacy, followed by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (68.7 %). rTMS demonstrated significantly superior efficacy compared with bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (BL ECT) and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy (RUL ECT). Theta burst stimulation (TBS) had the highest response rate (69.6 %), followed by rTMS (61.8 %). Based on the Mini-Mental State Examination, rTMS (86.4 %) ranked the highest, with RUL ECT showing significantly better outcomes than BL ECT.

CONCLUSION

NIBS, particularly rTMS and TBS, may offer effective treatment options for older patients with MDD. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is required to validate these findings and inform clinical practice.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症(MDD)在老年患者中很常见,并且经常与认知能力下降和生活质量降低相关。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术显示出治疗MDD的前景,但其在老年人群中的相对疗效和安全性仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较各种NIBS技术治疗老年MDD患者的疗效和认知影响。

方法

我们检索了从创刊到2024年3月的PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science核心数据库。纳入了17项随机对照试验(RCT)。

结果

使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值对干预措施进行排序。汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)结果的SUCRA排名表明,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)(89.0%)疗效最高,其次是经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)(68.7%)。与双侧电休克治疗(BL ECT)和右侧单侧电休克治疗(RUL ECT)相比,rTMS显示出显著更高的疗效。theta爆发刺激(TBS)的有效率最高(69.6%),其次是rTMS(61.8%)。基于简易精神状态检查表,rTMS(86.4%)排名最高,RUL ECT的结果明显优于BL ECT。

结论

NIBS,尤其是rTMS和TBS,可能为老年MDD患者提供有效的治疗选择。需要进行更大样本量和更长随访期的进一步研究来验证这些发现并为临床实践提供依据。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of multiple non-invasive brain stimulation to treat major depressive disorder in older patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis study based on randomized controlled trials.多种非侵入性脑刺激治疗老年患者重度抑郁症的比较疗效:一项基于随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析研究
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Feb;344:116340. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116340. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
2
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.非手术性脑刺激治疗成人重度抑郁发作急性期的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 27;364:l1079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1079.
3
Comparative efficacy of different noninvasive brain stimulation protocols on upper-extremity motor function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同非侵入性脑刺激方案对脑卒中后上肢运动功能和日常生活活动能力的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Aug;45(8):3641-3681. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07437-4. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
4
The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 criterion in patients with major depressive disorder without psychotic features: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies.重复经颅磁刺激对无精神病特征的重性抑郁障碍患者汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17 项评定标准的影响:干预研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 10;12(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01981-6.
5
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapy versus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: A systematic review and multiple-treatments meta-analysis.电休克疗法与重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症的疗效及可接受性比较:一项系统评价和多种治疗方法的荟萃分析。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.028. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
6
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症的系统评价与荟萃分析
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 3;51:181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
7
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: an evidence-based analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(7):1-98. Epub 2004 Jun 1.
8
Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非侵入性脑刺激治疗广泛性焦虑障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Oct;178:378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.07.046. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
9
Efficacy and acceptability of brain stimulation for anxiety disorders, OCD, and PTSD: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.脑刺激治疗焦虑症、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的疗效与可接受性:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
J Affect Disord. 2025 Feb 1;370:62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.071. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
10
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a meta-analysis of stimulus parameter effects.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症:刺激参数效应的荟萃分析
Neurol Res. 2013 Dec;35(10):1084-91. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000245. Epub 2013 Jul 25.