Yang Yang, Chen Jianglin, Yu Min, Xiong Cheng, Zhang Rong, Jiang Guohui
Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College; Institute of Neurological Diseases, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China.
Department of Neurology, Guang' an District People's Hospital, Guang' an, Sichuan, China.
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Feb;344:116340. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116340. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is prevalent among older patients and is frequently associated with cognitive decline and a reduced quality of life. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques show promise for treating MDD, but their comparative efficacy and safety older populations remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and cognitive effects of various NIBS techniques in treating MDD in older patients.
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science core databases from inception to March 2024. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included.
Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to rank the interventions. The SUCRA rankings for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) outcomes indicated that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (89.0 %) had the highest efficacy, followed by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (68.7 %). rTMS demonstrated significantly superior efficacy compared with bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (BL ECT) and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy (RUL ECT). Theta burst stimulation (TBS) had the highest response rate (69.6 %), followed by rTMS (61.8 %). Based on the Mini-Mental State Examination, rTMS (86.4 %) ranked the highest, with RUL ECT showing significantly better outcomes than BL ECT.
NIBS, particularly rTMS and TBS, may offer effective treatment options for older patients with MDD. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is required to validate these findings and inform clinical practice.
重度抑郁症(MDD)在老年患者中很常见,并且经常与认知能力下降和生活质量降低相关。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术显示出治疗MDD的前景,但其在老年人群中的相对疗效和安全性仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较各种NIBS技术治疗老年MDD患者的疗效和认知影响。
我们检索了从创刊到2024年3月的PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science核心数据库。纳入了17项随机对照试验(RCT)。
使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值对干预措施进行排序。汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)结果的SUCRA排名表明,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)(89.0%)疗效最高,其次是经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)(68.7%)。与双侧电休克治疗(BL ECT)和右侧单侧电休克治疗(RUL ECT)相比,rTMS显示出显著更高的疗效。theta爆发刺激(TBS)的有效率最高(69.6%),其次是rTMS(61.8%)。基于简易精神状态检查表,rTMS(86.4%)排名最高,RUL ECT的结果明显优于BL ECT。
NIBS,尤其是rTMS和TBS,可能为老年MDD患者提供有效的治疗选择。需要进行更大样本量和更长随访期的进一步研究来验证这些发现并为临床实践提供依据。