Suppr超能文献

通过传统随机对照试验和单病例试验对患者进行氯硝西泮的重新利用:罕见病开发的一种实验策略。

Clonazepam repurposing in patients through conventional RCT and N-of-1 trials: an experimental strategy for orphan disease development.

作者信息

van der Sluijs Pleuntje J, Safai Pour Koshar, Berends Cécile L, Kruizinga Matthijs D, Müller Annelieke R, van Eeghen Agnies M, Rodríguez-Girondo Mar, Juachon Maria J, Steenbeek Duco, Cohen Adam F, Zuiker Rob G J A, Santen Gijs W E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 2025 Feb 26;62(3):210-218. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2024-109951.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials for rare disorders have unique challenges due to low prevalence, patient phenotype variability and high expectations. These challenges are highlighted by our study on clonazepam in patients, a common cause of intellectual disability. Previous studies on Arid1b-haploinsufficient mice showed positive effects of clonazepam on various cognitive aspects.

METHODS

This study used a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study (RCT), followed by an N-of-1 design. In the crossover study, patients received clonazepam (max 0.5 mg, two times per day) or a placebo for 22 days with a 3-week washout period. Assessments included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics on neurocognitive tasks, behaviour and cognitive function. During phase I of the N-of-1 trial the optimal dosage and individual treatment goals were determined. Phase II evaluated the treatment effect. This phase was composed of three periods: an open-label period with placebo (4 weeks), followed by a double-blinded period (6 weeks), followed by an open-label period in which the patient received clonazepam (4 weeks).

RESULTS

In the clonazepam group (=16, 15 completing both periods), seven (44%) reported improvement on Clinician Global Impression of Improvement versus two (13%) on placebo. 13 (87%) showed 'no change' after placebo (two (13%) on clonazepam), while seven (44%) on clonazepam reported deterioration, often linked to side effects (=6), suggesting potential benefit from lower dosing. Three N-of-1 trials with RCT responders saw two patients improve on clonazepam during double-blinding, but clinical evaluation deemed the improvements insufficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach shows the feasibility and strength of combining conventional RCT and N-of-1 studies for therapeutic studies in populations with intellectual disabilities, distinguishing real treatment effects from expectation bias. Our findings suggest that clonazepam has no additional therapeutic value in patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EUCTR2019-003558-98, ISRCTN11225608.

摘要

背景

由于罕见病患病率低、患者表型变异以及期望较高,罕见病的临床试验面临独特挑战。我们对氯硝西泮治疗智力残疾患者(智力残疾的常见病因)的研究突出了这些挑战。先前对Arid1b单倍体不足小鼠的研究表明氯硝西泮对各种认知方面有积极影响。

方法

本研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、双向交叉研究(RCT),随后采用单病例设计。在交叉研究中,患者接受氯硝西泮(最大0.5毫克,每日两次)或安慰剂治疗22天,有3周的洗脱期。评估包括安全性、耐受性、药代动力学、神经认知任务的药效学、行为和认知功能。在单病例试验的第一阶段确定最佳剂量和个体治疗目标。第二阶段评估治疗效果。该阶段由三个时期组成:安慰剂开放标签期(4周),随后是双盲期(6周),接着是患者接受氯硝西泮的开放标签期(4周)。

结果

在氯硝西泮组(n = 16,15人完成两个时期),7人(44%)报告临床医师总体改善印象有改善,而安慰剂组为2人(13%)。13人(87%)在接受安慰剂后显示“无变化”(氯硝西泮组为2人(13%)),而氯硝西泮组7人(44%)报告病情恶化,通常与副作用有关(n = 6),提示较低剂量可能有益。对RCT应答者进行的三项单病例试验中,有两名患者在双盲期间接受氯硝西泮治疗有所改善,但临床评估认为改善不足。

结论

我们的方法显示了将传统RCT和单病例研究相结合用于智力残疾人群治疗研究的可行性和优势,能够区分真实治疗效果和期望偏差。我们的研究结果表明氯硝西泮对智力残疾患者没有额外的治疗价值。

试验注册号

EUCTR2019 - 003558 - 98,ISRCTN11225608。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab3/11877031/8f9c81caa14e/jmg-62-3-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验