Furubayashi Nobuki, Negishi Takahito, Mochida Manabu, Kijima Atsuhiro, Katsuki Harumichi, Nakamura Motonobu
Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
In Vivo. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):411-418. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13843.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The impact of enfortumab vedotin (EV) dose reduction and/or interruption on its efficacy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with advanced UC who received EV after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from December 2021 to June 2024. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the calculated relative dose intensity (RDI): RDI<50%, RDI ≥50 to <80%, and RDI ≥80%.
A total of 26 patients (male, n=15; median age, 72 years) were enrolled. The RDI was categorized as follows: ≥80% (n=13; 50.0%), ≥50 to <80% (n=7; 26.9%), and <50% (n=6; 23.1%). There were no marked differences in the overall response (p=0.921) or disease control rates (p=0.859) among the three groups categorized by the RDI. A log-rank test revealed no significant differences in either the progression-free survival (p=0.309) or the overall survival (p=0.704) according to RDI. There were no marked differences in the incidence of any-grade adverse events (AEs) (p=0.405) or grade ≥3 AEs (p=0.018) according to RDI. There were significant differences in the incidence of any-grade cutaneous AEs (p=0.038) and grade ≥3 cutaneous AEs (p=0.007) according to RDI. A multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG PS≥2 (p=0.009) and mixed UC (p=0.011) were independently associated with the prognosis.
Despite frequent dose reductions and interruptions required to manage treatment-emergent AEs during EV therapy, these adjustments did not significantly impair the drug's efficacy in patients with advanced UC.
背景/目的:恩扎妥昔单抗(EV)剂量降低和/或中断对晚期尿路上皮癌(UC)疗效的影响尚不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了2021年12月至2024年6月期间在铂类化疗和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗失败后接受EV治疗的晚期UC连续患者。根据计算出的相对剂量强度(RDI)将患者分为三组:RDI<50%、RDI≥50%至<80%和RDI≥80%。
共纳入26例患者(男性15例;中位年龄72岁)。RDI分类如下:≥80%(n = 13;50.0%)、≥50%至<80%(n = 7;26.9%)和<50%(n = 6;23.1%)。按RDI分类的三组之间的总体缓解率(p = 0.921)或疾病控制率(p = 0.859)无明显差异。对数秩检验显示,根据RDI,无进展生存期(p = 0.309)或总生存期(p = 0.704)均无显著差异。根据RDI,任何级别的不良事件(AE)发生率(p = 0.405)或≥Ⅲ级AE发生率(p = 0.018)无明显差异。根据RDI,任何级别的皮肤AE发生率(p = 0.038)和≥Ⅲ级皮肤AE发生率(p = 0.007)有显著差异。多因素分析显示,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)≥2(p = 0.009)和混合型UC(p = 0.011)与预后独立相关。
尽管在EV治疗期间为处理治疗中出现的AE需要频繁降低剂量和中断治疗,但这些调整并未显著损害晚期UC患者的药物疗效。