García-Rudolph A, Devilleneuve E A, Wright M A, Sanchez-Pinsach D, Opisso E
Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain; Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain; Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Healthc Qual Res. 2025 Mar-Apr;40(2):79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.11.001. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
Despite the importance of length of stay (LOS) following spinal cord injury, it remains underexplored in the literature. This study aims to bridge this gap by investigating the association between rehabilitation LOS and functional gains among patients with traumatic (TSCI) or non-traumatic (NTSCI) spinal cord injuries.
We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study assessing functional gains using the motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) from rehabilitation admission to discharge. Outcomes were analyzed across four neurological categories based on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS): C1-C4 AIS A-C; C5-8 AIS A-C; T1-S5 AIS A-C; and AIS D. Linear regression models estimated changes across rehabilitation LOS quarters (Q1-Q4), adjusting for covariates.
We included 1036 patients admitted for rehabilitation between 2007 and 2023 (46.3% TSCI, 53.7% NTSCI). TSCI: age 42.7, 80.2% male, 41.8% AIS A, LOS 90.5. NTSCI: age 55.7, 54.2% male, 14.2% AIS A, LOS 69.6. For TSCI, mFIM and SCIM III gains increased significantly from Q1 to Q2 (T1-S5-ABC, n=214) and Q2 to Q3 (AIS D, n=129). For NTSCI, gains increased from Q2 to Q3 (T1-S5-ABC, n=195) and from Q1 to Q2 as well as from Q2 to Q3 (AIS D, n=304). Adjusted models showed decreasing gains for Q2 and Q3 vs. Q1 (TSCI) but increasing gains for Q2-Q4 vs. Q1 (NTSCI) for both measures. No significant gains were observed from Q3 to Q4.
We identified specific neurological categories and LOS quarters yielding to significant functional gains.
尽管脊髓损伤后的住院时间(LOS)很重要,但在文献中仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在通过调查创伤性(TSCI)或非创伤性(NTSCI)脊髓损伤患者康复住院时间与功能改善之间的关联来填补这一空白。
我们进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究,使用运动功能独立性测量(mFIM)和脊髓独立性测量(SCIM III)评估从康复入院到出院的功能改善情况。根据美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS),在四个神经学类别中分析结果:C1 - C4 AIS A - C;C5 - 8 AIS A - C;T1 - S5 AIS A - C;以及AIS D。线性回归模型估计康复住院时间各季度(Q1 - Q4)的变化,并对协变量进行调整。
我们纳入了2007年至2023年间入院康复的1036例患者(46.3%为TSCI,53.7%为NTSCI)。TSCI:年龄42.7岁,男性占比80.2%,41.8%为AIS A,住院时间90.5天。NTSCI:年龄55.7岁,男性占比54.2%,14.2%为AIS A,住院时间69.6天。对于TSCI,mFIM和SCIM III的改善从第一季度到第二季度(T1 - S5 - ABC,n = 214)以及从第二季度到第三季度(AIS D,n = 129)显著增加。对于NTSCI,改善从第二季度到第三季度(T1 - S5 - ABC,n = 195)以及从第一季度到第二季度和从第二季度到第三季度(AIS D,n = 304)增加。调整后的模型显示,对于这两种测量方法,与第一季度相比,第二季度和第三季度的改善在TSCI中有所下降,但在NTSCI中从第二季度到第四季度与第一季度相比有所增加。从第三季度到第四季度未观察到显著改善。
我们确定了产生显著功能改善的特定神经学类别和住院时间季度。