Suppr超能文献

复杂下肢创伤局部皮瓣覆盖与截肢术后患者报告结局的比较

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Local Flap Coverage versus Amputation for Complex Lower Extremity Trauma.

作者信息

Bhagat Neel, Drake Connor, Dawson Steven, Loewenstein Scott N, Knox Kevin R, Adkinson Joshua M, Hassanein Aladdin H, Bamba Ravinder

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.

出版信息

Indian J Plast Surg. 2024 Oct 24;57(Suppl 1):S36-S42. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791741. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

There is a paucity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in lower extremity salvage. Limb salvage can often be achieved with the use of local muscle flaps or fasciocutaneous flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare PROs of patients who underwent lower extremity salvage using local fasciocutaneous flaps or muscle flaps to lower extremity amputation.  The outcomes of 61 patients that underwent lower extremity local flap reconstruction (  = 33) or amputation (  = 28) between 2014 and 2020 were recorded. Chart reviews were performed to collect perioperative data. Patients were contacted via telephone for participation in the survey portion of our study. PROs were recorded utilizing both the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).  Surveys were completed by 61 patients (response rate 59.2%). The mean time of survey after flap reconstruction or amputation was 2.7 ± 1.4 years. Recent trauma (within 90 days) was the most common indication for local flap coverage (  = 23). LEFS score and SF-36 physical functioning scores were significantly lower in patients who underwent muscle flaps compared with fasciocutaneous flaps (  = 0.021 and  = 0.022). Muscle flap patients had similar LEFS and SF-36 scores to amputation patients, while fasciocutaneous flap patients had significantly higher LEFS (  = 0.01), SF-36 physical functioning (  = 0.031), physical role functioning (  = 0.031), and emotional role functioning (  = 0.047) scores than amputation patients.  Patients who underwent local fasciocutaneous flaps for limb salvage reported higher PRO scores than those undergoing amputation, while patients undergoing muscle flaps reported outcomes similar to those undergoing amputation. PROs for muscle flap patients were significantly lower than those of fasciocutaneous flap patients. These data suggest that while fasciocutaneous and muscle flaps are both useful limb salvage procedures, fasciocutaneous flaps may confer advantages that result in improved patient-perceived outcomes. Further study is needed to better characterize outcomes in limb salvage.

摘要

在下肢保肢治疗中,患者报告结局(PROs)数据匮乏。使用局部肌皮瓣或筋膜皮瓣通常可实现肢体保全。本研究的目的是比较接受局部筋膜皮瓣或肌皮瓣进行下肢保肢治疗的患者与接受下肢截肢患者的PROs。

记录了2014年至2020年间61例行下肢局部皮瓣重建(n = 33)或截肢(n = 28)患者的结局。通过查阅病历收集围手术期数据。通过电话联系患者参与本研究的调查部分。使用下肢功能量表(LEFS)和36项简短健康调查(SF - 36)记录PROs。

61名患者完成了调查(回复率59.2%)。皮瓣重建或截肢后调查的平均时间为2.7±1.4年。近期创伤(90天内)是局部皮瓣覆盖最常见的适应证(n = 23)。与筋膜皮瓣患者相比,接受肌皮瓣的患者LEFS评分和SF - 36身体功能评分显著更低(P = 0.021和P = 0.022)。肌皮瓣患者的LEFS和SF - 36评分与截肢患者相似,而筋膜皮瓣患者的LEFS(P = 0.01)、SF - 36身体功能(P = 0.031)、身体角色功能(P = 0.031)和情感角色功能(P = 0.047)评分显著高于截肢患者。

接受局部筋膜皮瓣进行肢体保全的患者报告的PROs评分高于截肢患者,而接受肌皮瓣的患者报告的结局与截肢患者相似。肌皮瓣患者的PROs显著低于筋膜皮瓣患者。这些数据表明,虽然筋膜皮瓣和肌皮瓣都是有用的肢体保全手术,但筋膜皮瓣可能具有优势,从而改善患者感知的结局。需要进一步研究以更好地描述肢体保全的结局。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Local Flap Coverage versus Amputation for Complex Lower Extremity Trauma.
Indian J Plast Surg. 2024 Oct 24;57(Suppl 1):S36-S42. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791741. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Institutional Experience and Orthoplastic Collaboration Associated with Improved Flap-based Limb Salvage Outcomes.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Nov 1;479(11):2388-2396. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001925.
4
Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps in Lower Extremity Traumatic Reconstruction: A Multicenter Outcomes Analysis.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):191-199. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003927.
5
A decade of conflict: flap coverage options and outcomes in traumatic war-related extremity reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Mar;135(3):895-902. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001025.
6
A Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Recovery after Traumatic Lower Extremity Salvage.
J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.08.030. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
9
Limb salvage after vascular reconstruction followed by tissue transfer during the Global War on Terror.
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):734-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.039. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
Outcome comparison between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Feb;77:111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.11.036. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The Essential Local Muscle Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Jan;37(1):89-96. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709480. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
4
Amputations versus Salvage: Reconciling the Differences.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Jan;37(1):32-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696733. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
Patient-reported Outcome Instruments in Lower Extremity Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 3;7(5):e2218. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002218. eCollection 2019 May.
6
Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes following Free Flap Lower Extremity Reconstruction for Traumatic Injuries.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar;141(3):773-783. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004124.
7
Normative data for the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS).
Acta Orthop. 2017 Aug;88(4):422-426. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1309886. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
8
The mangled extremity score and amputation: Time for a revision.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Mar;82(3):518-523. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001339.
9
Evidence-Based Medicine: Management of Acute Lower Extremity Trauma.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):287e-301e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002860.
10
Measurement Properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale: A Systematic Review.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):200-16. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6165. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验