van Kampen Jeroen J A, van Nood Els, Mahmud Rizwan, Krullaars Zoë, Voskamp Tess, Voskamp Mike, Nijssen Tess, Voermans Jolanda J C, Charpentier Charlotte, Le Hingrat Quentin, van de Vijver David A M C, Gruters Rob A, Mesplède Thibault
Viroscience Department, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 29;12(1):ofae705. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae705. eCollection 2025 Jan.
The treatment management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-2 infection presents greater challenges compared to HIV-1 infection, primarily because of inherent resistance against non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors, particularly dolutegravir, have improved treatment outcomes for people with HIV-2. Lenacapavir, a novel and potent antiretroviral capsid inhibitor, offers additional therapeutic options. However, limited knowledge exists regarding HIV-2 resistance against dolutegravir and lenacapavir.
We report the case of a treatment-experienced individual who did not achieve virological suppression with regimens containing dolutegravir and lenacapavir. Clinical monitoring, genotypic and phenotypic resistance assays, and structural modeling were performed.
Lenacapavir was added to a failing regimen of boosted darunavir, twice daily dolutegravir, and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Initially, this addition led to a decline in the viral load and increase in CD4+ T-cell count, despite the identification of a previously unreported combination of integrase resistance mutations. However, virological suppression was not achieved and viral load, although reduced, resumed increasing. This rebound was associated with the development of an N73D capsid substitution in HIV-2, which conferred resistance against lenacapavir. Based on cell-based assays predicting hypersusceptibility to bictegravir, the regimen was adjusted to oral lenacapavir plus bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide, resulting in a resumption in viral load decline.
Although lenacapavir demonstrated therapeutic potential, our case underscores the critical need to combine it with other fully active antiretroviral agents to prevent the rapid emergence of resistance and achieve long-term virological control in treatment-experienced individuals with HIV-2.
与HIV-1感染相比,人类免疫缺陷病毒2型(HIV-2)感染的治疗管理面临更大挑战,主要原因是其对非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂存在固有耐药性。整合酶链转移抑制剂,尤其是度鲁特韦,改善了HIV-2感染者的治疗效果。新型强效抗逆转录病毒衣壳抑制剂来那卡帕韦提供了更多治疗选择。然而,关于HIV-2对度鲁特韦和来那卡帕韦的耐药情况,目前了解有限。
我们报告了一例有治疗史的个体,其使用含度鲁特韦和来那卡帕韦的方案未实现病毒学抑制。进行了临床监测、基因型和表型耐药性检测以及结构建模。
在达芦那韦增强方案、每日两次度鲁特韦方案以及两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂方案治疗失败后,加用来那卡帕韦。最初,尽管发现了一种先前未报告的整合酶耐药突变组合,但加用来那卡帕韦后病毒载量下降,CD4 + T细胞计数增加。然而,未实现病毒学抑制,病毒载量虽有下降但随后又开始上升。这种反弹与HIV-2中N73D衣壳替代突变的出现有关,该突变赋予了对来那卡帕韦的耐药性。基于细胞试验预测对比克替拉韦高度敏感,将治疗方案调整为口服来那卡帕韦联合比克替拉韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦艾拉酚胺,病毒载量再次下降。
虽然来那卡帕韦显示出治疗潜力,但我们的病例强调了将其与其他完全有效的抗逆转录病毒药物联合使用的迫切需求,以防止耐药性迅速出现,并在有治疗史的HIV-2感染者中实现长期病毒学控制。