• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言障碍儿童语言发展的相关因素。

Correlates of language development in language-disordered children.

作者信息

Schery T K

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 Feb;50(1):73-83. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5001.73.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.5001.73
PMID:3974216
Abstract

This study organized a large data archive gathered over 8 years on 718 children with language disorders. Descriptive data categorized by demographic/background, physical/development, social/personality, and language/academic characteristics were analyzed to provide a broad description of this group of children. Sets of descriptor variables in five domains were identified from program records and were used to predict language performance at program entry and relative language improvement over 2-3 years. Age was the strongest predictor for all analyses. In general, the primary research factors in the study (53 variables representing IQ, language history, socioeconomic status, physical/neurological, and social-emotional background) failed to account very well for either language performance at program entry or for relative language gain. In prediction of pretest language performance, IQ and physical factors played the strongest role. The two factors contributing significantly to prediction of relative gain were IQ (although surprisingly weakly) and social-emotional status. Characteristics of those children who progressed most while in the program were identified.

摘要

本研究整理了一个历时8年收集的大型数据档案,涉及718名语言障碍儿童。对按人口统计学/背景、身体/发育、社会/个性以及语言/学业特征分类的描述性数据进行了分析,以全面描述这群儿童。从项目记录中识别出五个领域的描述符变量集,并用于预测项目开始时的语言表现以及2至3年内的相对语言进步。年龄是所有分析中最强的预测因素。总体而言,该研究中的主要研究因素(代表智商、语言史、社会经济地位、身体/神经学以及社会情感背景的53个变量)在解释项目开始时的语言表现或相对语言进步方面都不太理想。在预测测试前的语言表现时,智商和身体因素发挥了最强的作用。对相对进步预测有显著贡献的两个因素是智商(尽管令人惊讶地微弱)和社会情感状况。确定了在项目期间进步最大的那些儿童的特征。

相似文献

1
Correlates of language development in language-disordered children.语言障碍儿童语言发展的相关因素。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 Feb;50(1):73-83. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5001.73.
2
An investigation of the comprehension and production of requests in normal and language-disordered children.对正常儿童和语言障碍儿童请求理解与表达的调查。
J Commun Disord. 1982 Mar;15(2):75-93. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(82)90023-5.
3
Interpreting the Leiter IQ: performance profiles of young normal and language-disordered children.
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Jun;25(2):291-6.
4
Validity and reliability of mothers' reports of language development in 1-year-old children in a large-scale survey in Bangladesh.孟加拉国一项大规模调查中母亲对1岁儿童语言发育报告的有效性和可靠性。
Food Nutr Bull. 2010 Jun;31(2 Suppl):S198-206. doi: 10.1177/15648265100312S212.
5
Neurological status of language-impaired and normal children.
Ann Neurol. 1981 Aug;10(2):159-63. doi: 10.1002/ana.410100206.
6
Word, syllable, and sound awareness in language-disordered children.语言障碍儿童的单词、音节和语音意识
J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 May;50(2):207-12. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5002.207.
7
Preschoolers with language disorders: 10 years later.患有语言障碍的学龄前儿童:十年后。
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Jun;27(2):232-44. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2702.244.
8
Language matches: illuminating or confounding? Research note.语言匹配:具有启发性还是令人困惑?研究笔记。
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Aug;36(4):772-6.
9
Underlying neurological dysfunction in children with language, speech or learning difficulties and a verbal IQ--performance IQ discrepancy.患有语言、言语或学习困难且言语智商与操作智商存在差异的儿童潜在的神经功能障碍。
B-ENT. 2012;8(2):71-6.
10
Language growth in children with heterogeneous language disorders: a population study.儿童语言障碍的语言发展:一项人群研究。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1092-1105. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12793.

引用本文的文献

1
Otitis media, hearing loss, and child development: a NICHD conference summary.中耳炎、听力损失与儿童发育:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所会议总结
Public Health Rep. 1986 May-Jun;101(3):289-93.